Frankie I got a distinction in A level physics (not much but someting) and my friend is an astro-physicist at Edinburgh university....... what you said.... wasn't true based on what we know possible now.
If you have evidence of it being true, just as all other facts/truth/science you are required to provide it.
Otherwise it is just an idea you are putting forward.....which is fine.....but expect to be questioned and asked for evidence.
I know it seems like many science favourable people here are anal on wanting proof and evidence on every small thing.... but that is because we know what happened when we decided to just let things go, without the evidence and just accept them or assume it could be true/might be true.... you end up a JW for 25 years.
Let's all just stick to the most honest stance we can make. What er have evidence for and nothing more. Conjecture is fine, but that is all it is...
By the way I purposefully never said SCIENCE is the only mechanism of persuasion, I specifically said..... evidence is required. Though I only trust the scientific method, for a means to analyse truth, i appreciate some do not, some do not even know about it. Still the minimum required beyond opinion is evidence. IF the opinion comes from someone unqualified in what they speak.... well you can imagine how much weight most would have in it and just how much evidence would be required.
There is no disrespect intended....I am sure you would agree......Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence....