Silent_Scream

Joined

• started 27 topics
• posted 175 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by Silent_Scream

• 
  170

  Simple answer, please! Scientifically explain the origin of life coming from nothing!

  by Silent_Scream in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  scientific method asserts nothing living can come from something non-living.

  science is observable, science is reproducible.

  a living thing coming from non-living matter has never been observed nor reproduced.. therefore, it takes faith in an unknown process to believe that that's exactly what happened in the beginning, with no evidence!.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Silent_Scream

  ok.
• 
  170

  Simple answer, please! Scientifically explain the origin of life coming from nothing!

  by Silent_Scream in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  scientific method asserts nothing living can come from something non-living.

  science is observable, science is reproducible.

  a living thing coming from non-living matter has never been observed nor reproduced.. therefore, it takes faith in an unknown process to believe that that's exactly what happened in the beginning, with no evidence!.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Silent_Scream

  I never said prove you don't know the answer. That would be stupid, NC.

  Read the OP and realize what I'm asking you to prove. or just read the title. If you can't prove life came from nothing, you reasoning is invalid.

  You dont have an answer. You probably never will. But you have FAITH, that at some point life on earth came from nothing. And yes, it is a BLIND FAITH thus far, because there is no evidence to support it that something like that can even happen. No evidence or proof at all.
• 
  170

  Simple answer, please! Scientifically explain the origin of life coming from nothing!

  by Silent_Scream in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  scientific method asserts nothing living can come from something non-living.

  science is observable, science is reproducible.

  a living thing coming from non-living matter has never been observed nor reproduced.. therefore, it takes faith in an unknown process to believe that that's exactly what happened in the beginning, with no evidence!.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Silent_Scream

  If I personally believe it was God, that's my business.

  If you believe it wasn't, your business.

  But if you idea goes against science itself, you don't have a leg to stand on.
• 
  170

  Simple answer, please! Scientifically explain the origin of life coming from nothing!

  by Silent_Scream in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  scientific method asserts nothing living can come from something non-living.

  science is observable, science is reproducible.

  a living thing coming from non-living matter has never been observed nor reproduced.. therefore, it takes faith in an unknown process to believe that that's exactly what happened in the beginning, with no evidence!.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Silent_Scream

  Your "question" has been answered multiple times on this thread, but you blithely continue to scream at other posters to answer ze qvestion. No answer. Yet you don't see the double standard. Athiest: No evidence life came from non-life. No scientific evidence that it could even occur. Believer: No scientific evidence of a God. Two opposite mentalities, yet, neither has sufficient evidence. What makes one better than the other? (And believe, I got many questions you would not be able to answer scientifically. But since you can't even address this one, then nothing else would even matter)
• 
  170

  Simple answer, please! Scientifically explain the origin of life coming from nothing!

  by Silent_Scream in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  scientific method asserts nothing living can come from something non-living.

  science is observable, science is reproducible.

  a living thing coming from non-living matter has never been observed nor reproduced.. therefore, it takes faith in an unknown process to believe that that's exactly what happened in the beginning, with no evidence!.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Silent_Scream

  Believer: where did life start?

  Atheist: I don't know.

  Believer: How can life start on it's own?

  Atheist: I don't know.

  Believer: Where is the evidence that has life has the ability to start on it's own?

  Atheist: There are some theories, but no evidence yet.

  Believer: You ask me for evidence, but you won't provide evidence.

  Atheist: I know it wasn't a God.

  Believer: Fine. But where did life come from?

  Atheist: I don't know. But it's based on some evidence we don't have yet.

  Believer: I'm not asking about God. Just the contradiction. Science is based on evidences. You don't have it. In fact, your idea goes against science. How is your way of reasoning different than any believer?

  Atheist: It wasn't magic!

  Believer: I know. That's my point. So please explain.

  Atheist: It wasn't God!

  Believer: Just give me evidence that life even may have come about on it's own.

  Atheist: It wasn't magic!

  Believer: nothing?... Im disappointed that you have no proof whatsoever for believing somehow something came from nothing. anything?

  Atheist: I know it wasn't magic! Or God!

  Believer: ok....
• 
  170

  Simple answer, please! Scientifically explain the origin of life coming from nothing!

  by Silent_Scream in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  scientific method asserts nothing living can come from something non-living.

  science is observable, science is reproducible.

  a living thing coming from non-living matter has never been observed nor reproduced.. therefore, it takes faith in an unknown process to believe that that's exactly what happened in the beginning, with no evidence!.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Silent_Scream

  Instead of Berengaria providing an answer, you'd rather comment on his quips.

  lol....
• 
  170

  Simple answer, please! Scientifically explain the origin of life coming from nothing!

  by Silent_Scream in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  scientific method asserts nothing living can come from something non-living.

  science is observable, science is reproducible.

  a living thing coming from non-living matter has never been observed nor reproduced.. therefore, it takes faith in an unknown process to believe that that's exactly what happened in the beginning, with no evidence!.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Silent_Scream

  FA

  Wow. Another ad hominem.

  Why don't you listen.

  LIFE CAN'T COME FROM NON-LIFE! NO SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE PROVES THAT IT HAS OR CAN.

  Since atheism would suggest thats the case, YOU ARE GOING AGAINST THE VERY SCIENCE YOU SUPPORT!

  Give an answer to your own contradiction or shut up.
• 
  170

  Simple answer, please! Scientifically explain the origin of life coming from nothing!

  by Silent_Scream in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  scientific method asserts nothing living can come from something non-living.

  science is observable, science is reproducible.

  a living thing coming from non-living matter has never been observed nor reproduced.. therefore, it takes faith in an unknown process to believe that that's exactly what happened in the beginning, with no evidence!.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Silent_Scream

  WOW. So not one person has provided an answer.

  NOT ONE! No evidence, the very thing you demand from us.

  But you all keep posting crap!

  If your can't asnwer, the OP, you have nothing to say.

  Scientifically, life can't come from non life. NO evidence of that. None. Zip. Zero. In 1248 years, maybe there will be answer. But none of you have it. And you all look down on believers.

  This turned into a joke thread!
• 
  170

  Simple answer, please! Scientifically explain the origin of life coming from nothing!

  by Silent_Scream in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  scientific method asserts nothing living can come from something non-living.

  science is observable, science is reproducible.

  a living thing coming from non-living matter has never been observed nor reproduced.. therefore, it takes faith in an unknown process to believe that that's exactly what happened in the beginning, with no evidence!.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Silent_Scream

  Let's get this straight.

  belief in a God is not a fall back answer for me. It's not, I don't have an answer, so God must have did it.

  So stop using that as your leverage.

  Any evidence I provide you will view differently. Ok. Your choice. But PROVE that life came about on it's own. Life started from nothing.

  YOU CAN'T. Therefore, you have no evidence for the origin of your own beliefs. But you still believe it.

  Hypocritical ignorance.
• 
  170

  Simple answer, please! Scientifically explain the origin of life coming from nothing!

  by Silent_Scream in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  scientific method asserts nothing living can come from something non-living.

  science is observable, science is reproducible.

  a living thing coming from non-living matter has never been observed nor reproduced.. therefore, it takes faith in an unknown process to believe that that's exactly what happened in the beginning, with no evidence!.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Silent_Scream

  Flat Accent provides no proof, simply straw manned me up.

  Flat Accent, I look to not change your position. But don't hypocritically tell me I supply no evidence when you clearly haven't either.

  That's my point! You have no answer for the OP yet you wish to condescend on belief in a Creator by referring to him as a "magic man in the sky".

  You might as well go back to the KH.