there is no direct evidence for any particular idea for abiogenesis.
So what's some roundabout evidence?
scientific method asserts nothing living can come from something non-living.
science is observable, science is reproducible.
a living thing coming from non-living matter has never been observed nor reproduced.. therefore, it takes faith in an unknown process to believe that that's exactly what happened in the beginning, with no evidence!.
there is no direct evidence for any particular idea for abiogenesis.
So what's some roundabout evidence?
scientific method asserts nothing living can come from something non-living.
science is observable, science is reproducible.
a living thing coming from non-living matter has never been observed nor reproduced.. therefore, it takes faith in an unknown process to believe that that's exactly what happened in the beginning, with no evidence!.
bohm - Provide evidence. That's all I'm asking! You want to insert all types propoganda to avert the question.
A better question is this:
Do you have any evidence?
(No double standards. I ask all religionists the same thing, believe me. But this thread is not about that. A lot of religions/theists sorely lack critical thinking and evidence in their beliefs. So I am putting EVERYONE on that block. Inluding atheism.)
I want/need proof!
scientific method asserts nothing living can come from something non-living.
science is observable, science is reproducible.
a living thing coming from non-living matter has never been observed nor reproduced.. therefore, it takes faith in an unknown process to believe that that's exactly what happened in the beginning, with no evidence!.
OTWO - I will not say God did it. I'm asking, not telling.
scientific method asserts nothing living can come from something non-living.
science is observable, science is reproducible.
a living thing coming from non-living matter has never been observed nor reproduced.. therefore, it takes faith in an unknown process to believe that that's exactly what happened in the beginning, with no evidence!.
Please do not sidestep the issue.
I am asking YOU for YOUR EVIDENCE. I will not insert God. I will not testify to the Biblical account. I just want evidence, the stuff you claim theists don't have.
scientific method asserts nothing living can come from something non-living.
science is observable, science is reproducible.
a living thing coming from non-living matter has never been observed nor reproduced.. therefore, it takes faith in an unknown process to believe that that's exactly what happened in the beginning, with no evidence!.
So what is the point of this thread if it is not about god?
Every single thread anti/pro theism goes into talk of evidence. Thats what I see constantly, no evidence of a God. Science must at least have some type of evidence to form a theory. Etc. FAIR ENOUGH!
I refuse to use the argument, you can't prove there is no God. That's fallacious.
So, I would like to see the evidence of ANY POSSIBLE ALTERNATIVES.
scientific method asserts nothing living can come from something non-living.
science is observable, science is reproducible.
a living thing coming from non-living matter has never been observed nor reproduced.. therefore, it takes faith in an unknown process to believe that that's exactly what happened in the beginning, with no evidence!.
We don't have the answers yet. Can you be comfortable with that?
So you have faith that there will be answers in the future, but you have no evidence right now? So how can you believe something living can come from something nonliving with no proof?
scientific method asserts nothing living can come from something non-living.
science is observable, science is reproducible.
a living thing coming from non-living matter has never been observed nor reproduced.. therefore, it takes faith in an unknown process to believe that that's exactly what happened in the beginning, with no evidence!.
I will not insert a God in this thread. The attacks against theism is there is NO EVIDENCE for believing in such. Let's go with that, then.
Therefore, I would like to know what's the evidence of the alternative, which would mean living from nonliving had to happen.
Just please provide scientific evidence.
scientific method asserts nothing living can come from something non-living.
science is observable, science is reproducible.
a living thing coming from non-living matter has never been observed nor reproduced.. therefore, it takes faith in an unknown process to believe that that's exactly what happened in the beginning, with no evidence!.
But you would HAVE to conclude something living got started from something non-living, correct?
scientific method asserts nothing living can come from something non-living.
science is observable, science is reproducible.
a living thing coming from non-living matter has never been observed nor reproduced.. therefore, it takes faith in an unknown process to believe that that's exactly what happened in the beginning, with no evidence!.
bohm - Can you answer the question please. Whether it be simple, in depth, whatever. Just solid scientific evidence.
scientific method asserts nothing living can come from something non-living.
science is observable, science is reproducible.
a living thing coming from non-living matter has never been observed nor reproduced.. therefore, it takes faith in an unknown process to believe that that's exactly what happened in the beginning, with no evidence!.
I will not insert a God in this thread. The attacks against theism is there is NO EVIDENCE for believing in such. Let's go with that, then.
Therefore, I would like to know what's the evidence of the alternative, which would mean living from nonliving had to happen.
Just please provide scientific evidence.