Again it is never magic.
I'm sure all theists will agree....
scientific method asserts nothing living can come from something non-living.
science is observable, science is reproducible.
a living thing coming from non-living matter has never been observed nor reproduced.. therefore, it takes faith in an unknown process to believe that that's exactly what happened in the beginning, with no evidence!.
Again it is never magic.
I'm sure all theists will agree....
scientific method asserts nothing living can come from something non-living.
science is observable, science is reproducible.
a living thing coming from non-living matter has never been observed nor reproduced.. therefore, it takes faith in an unknown process to believe that that's exactly what happened in the beginning, with no evidence!.
designs and kepler, I agree.
scientific method asserts nothing living can come from something non-living.
science is observable, science is reproducible.
a living thing coming from non-living matter has never been observed nor reproduced.. therefore, it takes faith in an unknown process to believe that that's exactly what happened in the beginning, with no evidence!.
Who ever said atheists claim life came from non-life?
Your statements are very naieve.
Lol. No matter how you think the universe got started, at some point life HAD have a start. Unless atheists believe life has been since time eternal.
scientific method asserts nothing living can come from something non-living.
science is observable, science is reproducible.
a living thing coming from non-living matter has never been observed nor reproduced.. therefore, it takes faith in an unknown process to believe that that's exactly what happened in the beginning, with no evidence!.
sizemik - If you want proof . . . why don't you get cracking and get looking for yourself from a neutral and honest standpoint? A challenge on a forum is either lazy or has an agenda . . . take your pick. Pitching your beliefs against what others think will only get you so far. At some stage you need to take responsibility for what your own mind decides, and get used to the fact that very few people will give a shit as to what that actually is.
Why does this not apply to atheists? why must they jump on any and every thread to belittle the ideas of theists?
Atheists, next time you would like to post your ideas/"facts"/"evidence", remember sizemik's words. At some stage you need to take responsibility for what your own mind decides, and get used to the fact that very few people will give a shit as to what that actually is.
scientific method asserts nothing living can come from something non-living.
science is observable, science is reproducible.
a living thing coming from non-living matter has never been observed nor reproduced.. therefore, it takes faith in an unknown process to believe that that's exactly what happened in the beginning, with no evidence!.
scientific method asserts nothing living can come from something non-living.
science is observable, science is reproducible.
a living thing coming from non-living matter has never been observed nor reproduced.. therefore, it takes faith in an unknown process to believe that that's exactly what happened in the beginning, with no evidence!.
I cannot prove the sun is 93,000,000 miles away.
No human can absolutely prove it in a sense because no human ever took a tape measure and measured it. Either, no human has ever been to the sun.
A lot went into figuring out the distance (time/temperature/etc formulas), but I do have faith their calculations are correct.
The answer is based on current accesible data and conclusions. So there is a fair amount of evidence to make the conclusion.
scientific method asserts nothing living can come from something non-living.
science is observable, science is reproducible.
a living thing coming from non-living matter has never been observed nor reproduced.. therefore, it takes faith in an unknown process to believe that that's exactly what happened in the beginning, with no evidence!.
If your asking as a legitimate question, the answer is we should reject it.
If it's a question to lure me into a battle of semantics, then the answer depends.
scientific method asserts nothing living can come from something non-living.
science is observable, science is reproducible.
a living thing coming from non-living matter has never been observed nor reproduced.. therefore, it takes faith in an unknown process to believe that that's exactly what happened in the beginning, with no evidence!.
I'm not debating a christian god, buddhist god, muslim god, etc.
I'm asking for scientific evidence that you demand from all others. Let's be fair.
scientific method asserts nothing living can come from something non-living.
science is observable, science is reproducible.
a living thing coming from non-living matter has never been observed nor reproduced.. therefore, it takes faith in an unknown process to believe that that's exactly what happened in the beginning, with no evidence!.
Many believe there is a God. They will state why the believe it. Atheists attack because there is no scientific evidence for it. Like I said, fair enough.
So now, atheists, the stage is yours. Where's the evidence in this critical part of your beliefs?
scientific method asserts nothing living can come from something non-living.
science is observable, science is reproducible.
a living thing coming from non-living matter has never been observed nor reproduced.. therefore, it takes faith in an unknown process to believe that that's exactly what happened in the beginning, with no evidence!.
I simply want proof. Everyone needs evidence on what they believe. Atheists and theists alike.
Anything else is based on faith/assumption.