Venus you are laughable.
Your logic is actually WORSE than the WT.
HAAAAAAA you are joking, right?
Past life experiences - really.. from Kids? I don't know if you are just putting us all on, or are really a moron.
By the way - you have not actually answered 1 question or point that has been asked of you.
You are obviously a Troll:)
And I think the only one who thinks Stevenson was a VERY eminent Scientist is you.
He was a quack who had Tenure.
Despite this early interest, most scientists ignored Stevenson's work. According to his New York Times obituary, his detractors saw him as "earnest, dogged but ultimately misguided, led astray by gullibility, wishful thinking and a tendency to see science where others saw superstition."[7] Critics suggested that the children or their parents had deceived him, that he was too willing to believe them, and that he had asked them leading questions. In addition, critics said, the results were subject to confirmation bias, in that cases not supportive of the hypothesis were not presented as counting against it.[8] Leonard Angel, a philosopher of religion, told The New York Times that Stevenson did not follow proper standards. "But you do have to look carefully to see it; that's why he's been very persuasive to many people."[7]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ian_Stevenson#Retirement,_death_and_experiment