I'm still reading parts, so I will comment later. But another advance reader has commented on Mom and B's next volume. I wish mom had lived to read this
https://truthhistory.blogspot.com/2019/09/another-comment-on-separate-identity.html
as separate identity v. 2, nears publication, it has generated some comments from advance readers, what writers tend to call "beta readers.
" one is posted to the history blog.
this is from a witness and reflects his point of view.
I'm still reading parts, so I will comment later. But another advance reader has commented on Mom and B's next volume. I wish mom had lived to read this
https://truthhistory.blogspot.com/2019/09/another-comment-on-separate-identity.html
as separate identity v. 2, nears publication, it has generated some comments from advance readers, what writers tend to call "beta readers.
" one is posted to the history blog.
this is from a witness and reflects his point of view.
as separate identity v. 2, nears publication, it has generated some comments from advance readers, what writers tend to call "beta readers.
" one is posted to the history blog.
this is from a witness and reflects his point of view.
as separate identity v. 2, nears publication, it has generated some comments from advance readers, what writers tend to call "beta readers.
" one is posted to the history blog.
this is from a witness and reflects his point of view.
Hi everyone,
As Separate Identity v. 2, nears publication, it has generated some comments from advance readers, what writers tend to call "beta readers." One is posted to the history blog. This is from a Witness and reflects his point of view. I find it interesting, even if I do not agree with bits of it. You may want to read it. Mom and Bruce worked hard on this book to get it right, to tell an honest, full story. I think the person who posted this comment is uncomfortable with the honesty. But ... read it. Tell me what you think.
https://truthhistory.blogspot.com/2019/09/some-preliminary-thoughts-on-separate.html
the montana case enters the home stretch.
the state supreme court will hear oral arguments tomorrow, 13 september, at the northern hotel in billings during the state bar of montana’s annual meeting (announcement 1, announcement 2).
an introduction to the argument will begin at 9:30 a.m., with the argument starting at 10 a.m. (4 p.m. utc, 9 a.m. sf time, 12 a.m. ny time, 5 p.m. london time, 2 a.m. saturday sydney time).
i know that present-day jehovah's witnesses believe that 144,000 are to go to heaven and rule alongside jesus, and that the survivors of armageddon along with those who will be resurrected are to live on earth with the prospect of living here forever.. questions:.
> what did pastor russell and the bible students originally believe about the earth?.
> did they believe that the earth would always exist and that it would become a paradise?.
You will want to read this: https://www.amazon.com/Separate-Identity-Organizational-Readers-1870-1887/dp/1304969401
to me, breakfast can be served at any time of the day.
a local bar in my area serves breakfast all day long.
for 5 bucks you get 2 eggs any way you like, bacon sausage or ham with home fries and toast!!
the afterword to volume 2, complete in rough draft is here https://truthhistory.blogspot.com/ impressions?.
the afterword to volume 2, complete in rough draft is here https://truthhistory.blogspot.com/ impressions?.
The afterword to volume 2, complete in rough draft is here https://truthhistory.blogspot.com/ Impressions?
le lundi 16 juin 1913, le pasteur charles t. russell prononça un discours privé - réservé aux "intéressés" - au golden gate commandery hall de san francisco (1) (2).dans un premier temps, lors de cette conférence intitulée "le temple de dieu", le 2ème président de la société watch tower s’identifia directement à 6 reprises comme "maçons", "franc [mot en italique] maçon", "maçon libre et accepté", membre du "grand ordre de maçonnerie libre et acceptée", adepte d'une "maçonnerie moderne" et membre de "l'ordre de la maçonnerie libre et accepté".
", 14 juin 1913, p.12 / "the san francisco call.
", 15 juin 1913 / "the san francisco call.
Having a meeting in a rented hall does not indicate belief. I attended a lecture held in a Methodist Church. It wasn't a religious lecture. And I'm not a Methodist, but by your reasoning I must be one because I attended a lecture in their building.
I attended classes held in a Presbyterian church to receive a certification. By your reasoning, attending those classes in a Presbyterian church makes me a Presbyterian. This is nonsense.