hello all.. i could use some help identifying the title of a wt book that i read back in the early 90's.
it was an older book when i read it.
i wish that i could recall more than i do.
Jeff wrote: :it's not the first time, I (and others) have inexplicably had entirely reasonable comments downvoted, and it's usually not just an innocent mistake."
It happens to me on a fairly regular basis. It's just part of this forum - a bit annoying, but people are free to do it, and I wouldn't stop them if I could.
hello all.. i could use some help identifying the title of a wt book that i read back in the early 90's.
it was an older book when i read it.
i wish that i could recall more than i do.
Jeff,
I'm responible. It was meant as an up vote. I've repaired the error
the watchtower characterizes christians not affiliated with the watchtower corporation as vomit eaters and filthy whores: .
“how well they pictured the spiritual drunkards of christendom at the present time!
besides actual wine and intoxicating liquors, there are other things to intoxicate the priests and preachers in christendom so as to induce drowsiness in them, to make them reel, to confuse things before their religious vision, to induce them to belch out the vomit of spiritually filthy things” - w59 3/1 pp.
You left out the scriptures the WT cited. They explain the illusions. And I'm fairly certain that something from 1959 would have NO effect on committed believers.
That aside, I'm comfortable seeing Prosperity Gospel/Faith Healers in that light. Okay you can down vote my post now.
leaked info:watchtower received $497 million from one country (britain) in last six years!
[must watch!].
this video was just released with documented proof, see this link: https://jehovahstruth.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=187#p187.
NotF
NO religion in the US pays property tax unless they rent it to a commercial enterprise.
leaked info:watchtower received $497 million from one country (britain) in last six years!
[must watch!].
this video was just released with documented proof, see this link: https://jehovahstruth.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=187#p187.
I don't see this as any sort of scandal. Have you researched the finances of other denominations? Aside from that, what adherents contribute is their own damn business. NOT yours.
jehovah's witnesses are a cult .
pure & simple!.
the wickedness we see prevalent today among the jehovah’s witnesses can no doubt be largely attributed to the leadership of the organization, the watchtower society and it's governing body.
Don't pick on the original poster too hard; he felt the need to rant, even if it meant preaching to the choir.
was it jehovahs witnesses who acknowledge the church father as leading teachers?
this is a very interesting statement by justin.
do you accept origen as an authority when he said jesus is our god?
Joseph Priestley's History of the Early Opinions Concerning Jesus Christ Compiled from the Earliest Writers, a multi-volume work is found here:
https://www.google.com/search?tbm=bks&hl=en&q=%22joseph+priestley%22+%22early+opinions%22
Well worth the read and balances the claim that the 'early fathers' were all Trinitarian.
okay all you history buffs, compulsive researchers and simply curious: can you identify the location and date of this photo?.
https://truthhistory.blogspot.com/2024/05/district-assembly-itentify.html.
Okay all you history buffs, compulsive researchers and simply curious: Can you identify the location and date of this photo?
https://truthhistory.blogspot.com/2024/05/district-assembly-itentify.html
was it jehovahs witnesses who acknowledge the church father as leading teachers?
this is a very interesting statement by justin.
do you accept origen as an authority when he said jesus is our god?
Joseph Priestly wrote an extensive history of non-Trinitarian belief in the post-Apostolic age. In fact many of the early writers were not Trinitarian. The OP is as guilty as the Watchtower in quoting selectively. I recommend reviewing Priestley's work, if you can find it.
Calling someone a "leading teacher" means nothing more that that they were well-known. It is not an endorsement of their teaching.
if it is illegal for minors to get married, enter into contracts, drink, and smoke, why is it legal for them to enter into lifelong religious contracts they can not break without family shunning and community ostracism????
how religious shunning ruins lives.
a form of institutionalized estrangement, shunning hurts health of the excluded.. updated march 27, 2024 |psychology today magazine.
Psychology Today is not a psychiatric journal. The two are not the same. This isn't a medical journal and the articles are not peer reviewed. Psychology Today is a 'popular' magazine meant for the general public. So it doesn't carry the same weight as The American Journal of Psychiatry or similar professional journals.
Use it with caution.
