vienne

Joined

• started 102 topics
• posted 1,400 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by vienne

• 
  3121

  It's been a long 9 years Lloyd Evans / John Cedars (continued)

  by Simon in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  uh oh, looks like the mega thread gave up the ghost, so while i investigate / fix it just continue the discussion here .... it's been a long 9 years lloyd evans / john cedars.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  vienne

  I see Lloyd is back.
• 
  225

  The point of existence and how it refutes the Trinity

  by slimboyfat in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  rowan williams, the former archbishop of canterbury gave an interesting answer to the somewhat stark question, what’s the point of us existing?

  as a christian, my starting point is that we exist because the most fundamental form of activity, energy, call it what you like, that is there, is love.

  that is, it’s a willingness that the other should be.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  vienne

  ask ... nonsense. you rely on cut and past from catholic sources, often quoting them. you NEVER rely on scripture alone.

  Re-read Revelation 22:1. the throne is God's. the lamb sits on it with God. It does not say he is God. A prime example of your reading scripture through extra biblical sources instead of the bible alone.
• 
  225

  The point of existence and how it refutes the Trinity

  by slimboyfat in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  rowan williams, the former archbishop of canterbury gave an interesting answer to the somewhat stark question, what’s the point of us existing?

  as a christian, my starting point is that we exist because the most fundamental form of activity, energy, call it what you like, that is there, is love.

  that is, it’s a willingness that the other should be.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  vienne

  Our Catholic troll is unable to argue based only on Scripture. He is afraid to discuss scripture alone. This is pity worthy. But it mirrors the Scribes and Pharisees.
• 
  9

  The Big Secret

  by finishedmystery in

  1. watchtower
  2. scandals

  when the gb brought a formal end to all the type/antitypes in so many ways it could be said that they brought the religion to an end.

  the other sheep/anointed teaching that leads to a two class religion was originally based on two antitypes--the jehu/jehonadab relationship and something about the cities of refuge.

  in that 2014 annual meeting talk david splane even specifically stated that the cities of refuge has no antitype.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  vienne

  Somewhat factually incorrect. The two classes theory was derived from a Brethren and an Anglican writer and not based on a type. Types were used later to bolster the theory. The Brethren was William Trotter. [Plain Papers, first chapter]. The Anglican was Dunbar Isidore Heath [The Future Human Kingdom]

  You may also want to consult Schulz and de Vienne, Separate Identity, volume 2, chapter two.

  The type/antitype hermeneutic as expressed through Rutherford-Knorr-Franz entered Watchtower theology in 1918 when Rutherford replied in kind to PSL Johnson's articles about Jeremiah's prophecy. The recent move away from it is a return to the Watchtower's literalist roots.
• 
  22

  Re: Russell's connection to Masons and Secret Societies

  by Enlightened1 in

  1. watchtower
  2. scandals

  our history is not what we have been taught.

  the golden dawn history.

  we see that russell was involved with freemasonry and used freemasonry symbols on his earlier magazines.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  vienne

  Our Cognitively Challenged troll’s “proofs” as presented above are full of classically defined logic flaws. Most prominent of these is Argument from Absence (Ad Ignorantiam). She suggests that absence of evidence is in fact evidence. For instance, saying "there is no record of Russell being a member of any Lodge" implies that he was a member and the lack of any documented proof is in itself proof that he was. This is moronic. Absence of evidence is not evidence.

  A subset of Ad Ignorantiam argument is “Cherry-Picking Evidence,” a selective use of information. She presents a series of statements that have no or questionable worth as evidential matter.

  False Dichotomy: Her statements create a false sense of dichotomy where one might think that, since there is no documented proof provided by the organization, it implies an absolute proof that the Watchtower is hiding ‘something.’

  Ignoring Counterevidence: Our mental case fails to deal with substantial evidence that Russell was not a Mason.

  Aside from the logic flaws I’ve noted here, she has through these ‘discussions’ failed to clearly state why she was disfellowshipped, evasively stating that she disagreed with those in authority. She denied being EasyPrompt, though later implying she was. She has suggested that she is God’s messenger, though her thought processes suggest she’s an escaped mental patient. Probably flushed her meds again. And as a bit of humor, she persists is thinking I’m a Witness or a former Witness, and she confuses me with my mother.
• 
  22

  Re: Russell's connection to Masons and Secret Societies

  by Enlightened1 in

  1. watchtower
  2. scandals

  our history is not what we have been taught.

  the golden dawn history.

  we see that russell was involved with freemasonry and used freemasonry symbols on his earlier magazines.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  vienne

  all that is irrelevant, off point, and proves NOTHING
• 
  225

  The point of existence and how it refutes the Trinity

  by slimboyfat in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  rowan williams, the former archbishop of canterbury gave an interesting answer to the somewhat stark question, what’s the point of us existing?

  as a christian, my starting point is that we exist because the most fundamental form of activity, energy, call it what you like, that is there, is love.

  that is, it’s a willingness that the other should be.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  vienne

  Sea, that's totally unscriptural. It contradicts Ecclesiastes, "the dead know nothing."
• 
  19

  Top Jehovahs witnesses Historians

  by Paul Bonanno in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  hi .

  who do you think are the best historian/historians about the history of jehovahs witnesses?.

  paul.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  vienne

  Nathan,

  I understand.
• 
  225

  The point of existence and how it refutes the Trinity

  by slimboyfat in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  rowan williams, the former archbishop of canterbury gave an interesting answer to the somewhat stark question, what’s the point of us existing?

  as a christian, my starting point is that we exist because the most fundamental form of activity, energy, call it what you like, that is there, is love.

  that is, it’s a willingness that the other should be.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  vienne

  Your interpretation of the nature of man and your support scriptures to prove the trinity are off the mark. Nothing to comment on. You haven't proved your point in any scriptural way.
• 
  225

  The point of existence and how it refutes the Trinity

  by slimboyfat in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  rowan williams, the former archbishop of canterbury gave an interesting answer to the somewhat stark question, what’s the point of us existing?

  as a christian, my starting point is that we exist because the most fundamental form of activity, energy, call it what you like, that is there, is love.

  that is, it’s a willingness that the other should be.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  vienne

  If Christ's death provided mankind's ransom, but he really didn't die, how can we say there was any ransom?