Our
Cognitively Challenged troll’s “proofs” as presented above are full of
classically defined logic flaws. Most prominent of these is Argument
from Absence (Ad Ignorantiam). She suggests that
absence of evidence is in fact evidence.
For instance, saying "there is no record of Russell being a member of any
Lodge" implies that he was a member and the lack of any documented proof
is in itself proof that he was. This is moronic. Absence of evidence is not
evidence.
A subset of Ad Ignorantiam argument is “Cherry-Picking
Evidence,” a selective use of information. She presents a series of statements
that have no or questionable worth as evidential matter.
False Dichotomy: Her statements create a false sense of dichotomy where one
might think that, since there is no documented proof provided by the
organization, it implies an absolute proof that the Watchtower is hiding ‘something.’
Ignoring Counterevidence: Our mental case fails to deal with substantial
evidence that Russell was not a Mason.
Aside from the logic flaws I’ve noted here, she has through these ‘discussions’
failed to clearly state why she was disfellowshipped, evasively stating that
she disagreed with those in authority. She denied being EasyPrompt, though
later implying she was. She has suggested that she is God’s
messenger, though her thought processes suggest she’s an escaped mental
patient. Probably flushed her meds again. And as a bit of humor, she persists
is thinking I’m a Witness or a former Witness, and she confuses me with my mother.
