several times over the past few months i have had conversations, both here and in real life, with religious people making all sorts of interesting and conflicting claims.
i like to know how things work, so generally i will ask questions to net out what i am being told and see if it can be explained and make sense.. for instance, if someone said 2+2=4 and i asked how, there are a variety of ways that could be shown to me, a number line, physical objects being put together, counting on fingers and toes, etc.
indeed, in my personal life, i often have to explain how certain technologies work, sometimes planned, sometimes off the cuff, from a variety of group sizes to a varying degree of technical expertise.
CAPPY! I was trying to get clambake to come to that conclusion or at least allow him/her to prevaricate enough that it was obvious he didn't know.
Sorry! I didn't mean to be rational! Where was my brainwashing "training from infancy" when Viviane needed it?!
several times over the past few months i have had conversations, both here and in real life, with religious people making all sorts of interesting and conflicting claims.
i like to know how things work, so generally i will ask questions to net out what i am being told and see if it can be explained and make sense.. for instance, if someone said 2+2=4 and i asked how, there are a variety of ways that could be shown to me, a number line, physical objects being put together, counting on fingers and toes, etc.
indeed, in my personal life, i often have to explain how certain technologies work, sometimes planned, sometimes off the cuff, from a variety of group sizes to a varying degree of technical expertise.
Asking religious people to prove the existence of god is like asking an atheist to disprove there being any intelligence in our design.
There's a huge difference between those two things.
Atheists/agnostics do not claim that there is no intelligence in our "design." They just point out the fallacy of coming to a conclusion that something exists when there is no evidence to support that conclusion. You can't prove a negative. Either you have evidence of something or you don't.
Faith is not evidence. Warm and fuzzy stories are not evidence. An old book is not evidence.
apparently it was announced last night.
i was not informed (for 'legal reasons'), but they phoned my dad and told him.
i understand it is due to my apostate book.
stay with it to the chorus.
there's an easter egg.. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qxq5or2z1cg.
stay with it to the chorus.
there's an easter egg.. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qxq5or2z1cg.
It wont play!!!!!
damn.... I was looking forward to a laugh.
Dang...Because of your country? It's working here in Texas.
my husband is awake,yay!
we haven't been to meeting since february, although we attended the memorial.
when jws have called us we say we are amazing, everything is awesome much to their shock.
Well, if he or you doesn't do a "mea culpa" and admit that what was said was "faulty" thinking, then you could be deemed rebellious and it could escalate.
If your husband wants to meet, it might be a course of action to just say, "Yeah, we said those things. Were they wrong to say?"
Then when they tell you that it definitely was wrong, say, "Oh, I am so sorry! Maybe we need to do more research about higher education. We will make that the subject of our next family study!"
2015 april 10, boe.. re: jw broadcasting monthly programs.
.. click the link below and then click the green download button.. .. http://wwwb.fileflyer.com/view/q2k73ae.
.. .. atlantis!.
Thanks Atlantis!
Does anyone truly believe that this was a "trial" basis to begin with? Why spend all that money on the studio and equipment if it was only a "trial" run?
Stupid lies.
stay with it to the chorus.
there's an easter egg.. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qxq5or2z1cg.
stay with it to the chorus.
there's an easter egg.. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qxq5or2z1cg.
Stay with it to the Chorus. There's an easter egg.
