I hate these a-hole false prophecies! They e been doing it forever!
cappytan
JoinedPosts by cappytan
-
32
New Watchtower-- the End is coming in our lifetime again now??
by FusionTheism inthey just posted the simplified august study watchtower on jw.org.. paragraph 11 of the "expectation!
" article says this:.
"so even if we feel that we have been waiting a long time, this does not mean that the end is far away or that it is not coming in our lifetime.".
-
-
53
Spirituality
by Jonathan Drake inif you are a current practitioner of some religious faith i would appreciate it if you abstained from this thread entirely.
im curious if anyone has had what could be discribed as a spiritual experience.
i'm currently reading sam harris book waking up and it's very good so far.
-
cappytan
Here is an interesting article by Sam Harris on Buddhism: http://www.lionsroar.com/killing-the-buddha/ -
8
Hierarchy of Needs Revelation
by freemindfade inin my quest to always understand why jws get so f%$@ed up (yes oubliette, lets review lol) i discovered something today.
in speaking with one of my fellow heathen friends from this site i was talking about maslov's hierarchy of needs in an unrelated subject but i had an epiphany.
witnesses are held at the third level and never make it to the oh so critical top two sections.
-
cappytan
I think they would disagree with you and say, "I''ve acheived a lot of things! I was a bethelite! I'm an elder! I respect others, that's why I go in service! I'm moral! I'm a JW artist so I'm creative! I know how to solve problems...use the Bible! I'm not prejudiced! I have plenty of black friends in the truth! I accept the facts...it's a sacred secret! -
14
A checklist for Lurking JW's.
by cappytan indear lurking jw's:.
if you were in a cult, how would you know?
cults don't call themselves cults.
-
cappytan
fastJehu: Good one! Unfortunately, I can't edit the OP anymore. lol -
14
A checklist for Lurking JW's.
by cappytan indear lurking jw's:.
if you were in a cult, how would you know?
cults don't call themselves cults.
-
cappytan
fastJehu: Any other reference I should use instead?
We all know the JW FAQ is the sanitized version of the doctrines.
-------------
Can anyone else help with modern JWdotORG references for the rest of the points? I have to work right now. lol
-
14
A checklist for Lurking JW's.
by cappytan indear lurking jw's:.
if you were in a cult, how would you know?
cults don't call themselves cults.
-
cappytan
Dear Lurking JW's:
If you were in a cult, how would you know? Cults don't call themselves cults. The Branch Davidians and Jonestown cults didn't consider themselves cults.
Here are some identifying marks of cults:
1. Ruled by a man or group of men. YES - Governing Body
Reference: http://wol.jw.org/en/wol/d/r1/lp-e/2002203#h=12
2. Isolate you from your previous friends, family, and humanity YES - Bad Associations spoil useful habits
Reference: http://wol.jw.org/en/wol/d/r1/lp-e/1102006152#h=28
3. Tell you they are the only way, the only truth, and the only ones that can save you. YES - JW's refer to their religion as "The Truth" and their teachings as "Sacred Secrets"
Reference: http://wol.jw.org/en/wol/d/r1/lp-e/2011568#h=16
4. They use fear to persuade you to never leave them. YES - Armageddon, Disfellowshipping
Reference: http://wol.jw.org/en/wol/d/r1/lp-e/2008241#h=25
http://wol.jw.org/en/wol/d/r1/lp-e/11020080835. If you leave you are punished severely. YES - Disfellowshipping, shunned by friends and family
Reference: http://wol.jw.org/en/wol/d/r1/lp-e/1102008083
6. Abuse is allowed because it favors a patriarchal society were men get privileges women don't. YES - Countless cases of abuse in the organization. Men are the only ones allowed to teach.
Reference: http://wol.jw.org/en/wol/d/r1/lp-e/1102008084
http://wol.jw.org/en/wol/d/r1/lp-e/402015042#h=177. They require some sort of sacrifice. YES - No Blood transfusions, no hanging out at party/bar, no holidays
Reference: http://wol.jw.org/en/wol/d/r1/lp-e/2000447
8. They threaten you with lose of family, friends if you don't do as they say. YES - Disfellowshipping and/or marking
Reference: http://wol.jw.org/en/wol/d/r1/lp-e/1102008083
9. They claim its not them, but God that wants you to act a certain way. YES - The Governing Body claims to be God's channel for communication.
Reference: http://wol.jw.org/en/wol/d/r1/lp-e/2002203#h=12
10. They claim they get their power by God. YES. - See above
11. They don't want you to read any literature that is against their cause. YES - The Governing Body discourages looking at literature and websites that are critical of the organization.
Reference: http://wol.jw.org/en/wol/d/r1/lp-e/1102008064#h=14
12. They discourage, use fear, threaten, or order that certain medical procedures are not done. YES - No Blood transfusions, in the past they used to ban organ transplants too.
Reference: http://wol.jw.org/en/wol/d/r1/lp-e/2000447
13. They discourage education that they aren't involved in. YES - The Governing Body frequently goes on rants against higher education.
Reference: http://wol.jw.org/en/wol/d/r1/lp-e/2011448#h=9
14. They are usually apocalyptic in their speech. YES - Armageddon
-
39
Does What We Say Here Or In Person Really Help JWs To Get Out Of The Religion?
by minimus inif we are in the congregation, do you think our comments or questions actually reach elders or others in the congregation?
do our comments on this board affect witnesses to the point of questioning their faith?
-
cappytan
I was an active uber dub and if it weren't for this site, I may have given in to cognitive dissonance and suppressed my doubts.
It's liberating when you find out you're not alone and there are others out there that are feeling the same doubts as you are.
-
13
587 vs 607: JW sources only
by wifibandit inthe latest jw podcast has inspired me to update the copypasta comment that i post anytime this topic comes up.. i have formatted it to more closely follow the wonderful www.jwfacts.com table.
i have also added a few more links directly to the jw online library.
"evil-merodach reigned two years" w65 1/1 p. 29.
-
cappytan
SimonSays: The Society accepts 539 BCE as the date of the fall of babylon.
They accept an archeological source when it agrees with them. But if that same source disagrees with them on another point, they don't accept it.
Why is it okay to accept a source for something that confirms your belief, yet reject that same source when it goes against your doctrine?
I'll answer that question: it's a little thing called "Confirmation Bias."
-
134
Young Girl Exposes Jehovah's Witnesses at school video goes VIRAL last 2 days 273,000 views
by Watchtower-Free inoriginal thread here.
http://www.jehovahs-witness.com/topic/291080001/brave-high-school-student-exposes-abuse-corruption-within-jehovahs-witnesses.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rdvt_gyq-ls.
-
cappytan
That is so awesome that Dawkins tweeted it. -
9
does us Bethel Rachel oily racially reflect the publishers in us
by poopie inyour thoghts racially not oily
-
cappytan
Rachel oily skin color and the rest of the best thing about being able to get my nails done tomorrow night with a few weeks ago when the first place I have to be.