It was in the Lopez case that Loesch refused to testify.
The Lopez case was ruled on in October 2014.
Loesch was on the broadcast in March 2015.
So, has he been in a broadcast since he refused to honor a subpoena? The answer is, "Yes."
just wondering?
he denied being in subjection to the the watchtower corporation so are they still using him in their regular monthly broadcast.
It was in the Lopez case that Loesch refused to testify.
The Lopez case was ruled on in October 2014.
Loesch was on the broadcast in March 2015.
So, has he been in a broadcast since he refused to honor a subpoena? The answer is, "Yes."
i was told that today by a jw...no more to say.
hi everyone, .
we have 4 ex-jws coming tomorrow for a meetup in san marcos, tx.
pm me for more information.
reading archbishop resigns after archdiocese charged with coverup article?.
archbishop john nienstedt, deputy resign after archdiocese of st. paul and minneapolis charged with sex abuse coverup.
| by nicole winfield.
ABibleStudent: They would respond by saying, "Why should anyone in the Governing Body resign over a manufactured, false controversy?"
We see the controversies and scandals for what they are. JW's that are loyal see controversies and scandals as Satanic lies and propaganda.
it is time for christians to accept evolution, in my opinion.. there are many reasons why i think it is long overdue for all christians to finally accept what science says about evolution.
below i will show these reasons.. .
the bible tells people to pay attention to nature to see the glory of god (psalm 19; romans 1:19-20).
this is a bizarre story.. there is a woman who is the local leader of the naacp who is obviously trying to mislead people into believing she is black who is actually white.
very white.. she obviously gets a tan regularly but looks more orange.
yes, orange really is the new black!.
Instead of assuming that she did this for purely selfish reasons, say she truly feels that she's black and wants to be black.
Obviously, genetically she is not black.
How is this any different than the Caitlyn Jenner situation? I accept Caitlyn as a woman because that's who she wants to be. Obviously, genetically Caitlyn has the chromosomes of a male. But if Caitlyn wants to be a woman, I'm going to support her and applaud her.
Again, how is this different? I can condemn the toxic deceptive behavior (that example of the photo Simon gave in the OP), but I don't think I can laud Caitlyn in one sentence for being who she is and then condemn this woman for being who she is if that's all she was trying to be.
http://www.9news.com.au/national/2015/06/11/19/06/parents-under-fire-for-failing-to-allow-lifesaving-blood-transfusion-to-terminally-ill-son.
there is a video that can be seen at the above link that is worth watching.. the andersons.
7:10pm june 11, 2015 parents under fire for failing to allow lifesaving blood transfusion to terminally ill son.
i was wondering if anyone had an audio recording of a woman, preferably a minor being asked the intimate details of a fornication jc.
that would hit the fan hard.
the latest jw podcast has inspired me to update the copypasta comment that i post anytime this topic comes up.. i have formatted it to more closely follow the wonderful www.jwfacts.com table.
i have also added a few more links directly to the jw online library.
"evil-merodach reigned two years" w65 1/1 p. 29.
Just a quick bump.... Important OP for lurkers.
"theism" here means "belief in a god" or "the worldview that an intelligent designer created the universe and life.
" ("god" here means a being with a mind who initiated and/or wound-up the universe, and designed life on earth)the most common claim that i see atheists making on twitter, is that "no evidence" exists in support of belief in a god.this post will remove any excuse atheists have for claiming "no evidence exists" in support of an initiator.
atheists can still reject this evidence as "weak," but they cannot truthfully say it does not exist.now, it is true that we do not have "observable, repeatable, falsifiable, empirical, scientific" evidence conclusively proving that an initiator exists, but we do have many lines of philisophical, experiential, and logical evidence.and... here... we... go:1:) many leading scientists, including stephen hawking, say that the space-time-matter universe had a beginning at the singularity/big bang.