does every issue of morality have to be compared with the thinking and teaching of jehovahs witnesses?
simply because you are no longer jehovahs witnesses does that mean that you flaunt all moral authority and engaged in any perverted pleasure that you have a mind to?
because your morality is no longer legislated by a pseudo religious organization does that give you license to engage in all acts of "immorality" and refer to it "as just having fun.
CHILDREN WELLCOME!!!
Do you have any?
Do you let them see/hear anything you talk/do with your bed partner?
Why?
Where do you draw the line?
SIMON,
This is YOUR board...
If my memory serve my wel, H2O board had some specific stated objectives.
Any activity or board should have an objective.\
Will the Wall Street Journal, NY Times, London Times print anything even if you paid them?
does every issue of morality have to be compared with the thinking and teaching of jehovahs witnesses?
simply because you are no longer jehovahs witnesses does that mean that you flaunt all moral authority and engaged in any perverted pleasure that you have a mind to?
because your morality is no longer legislated by a pseudo religious organization does that give you license to engage in all acts of "immorality" and refer to it "as just having fun.
CHILDREN may want to read SILENTLAMB issues and ACCIDENTALLY be exposed to something they are no prepared to absorb, raising curiosity and confusing them, unneccessarily.
SIMON what is your reaction?
What is the purpose of THIS forum? isn't it for jw/wt related issues?
I have not read/seen the topic/pictures, not interested so far...
I have not read all the post on THIS topic. Anyway by opinion is:
But if it is a sexuallly oriented topic/pictures they should not be on the ACTIVE topic That kind of material should not even be on THIS FORUM at least not on this section.
MIXING all kind of topics in the ACTIVE option is just confusing.
SIMON,
We should have the option to SORT the topics in any way we want.
It may be asking too much but
SORT ALL topics
by latest date/hour POST = ACTIVE,
by "subject",
by author
SORT topics in a SELECTED section only, UN, SILENTLAMBS etc
Lest get better searching options not just searching the SUBJECT field.
btw
Freedom of speech does not mean i should be forced or unspectedly listen/read/watch something i had no intention to listen/read/watch.
oh darn...i hate when life grants those wishes, when you ask for them.
this august 7th i leave the u.s. and fly to rio de janeiro and will be coming back late january or should time provide, mid march.
i dread staying untill march, because of carnival...i know, i know...terrible, absolutely terrible.
Say hello to Cardoso, you know, the president who married a 19 years old Carnival dancer girl a couple of years ago. He was over 60...
Find out if Xuxa is still single.
a question for the legal beagles out there:.
since the watchtower thugs have told the press during the dateline repartee that barbara anderson was not being taken to task for her anti-molestation iniitatives, but alleged that she was being tried for ``allegations or serious sins'' unrelated to her activism, how strong a case would she have in court?.
bear in mind that barbara and the others of the dateline four say they did nothing more than speak for the protection of children and then publicly challenged the wt to publicly state their accusations and evidence, and that they would indemnify them against any charges arising therefrom.. so.... if they call her a sinner, say that her sin has nothing to do with whistle-blowing and is serious enough to merit expulsion -- as serious as adultery or theft, yet refuse to accept her challenge to show the world the basis of their charges if they are held harmless, how is that not libel and therefore actionable?
What about a court case outside the USA, France?
Yes, WT lawyers can not be too smart,
Being a jw with all the info available about the org. = __________(you fill the blank)
I have seen DO and above, among the best wt minds, doing very stupid things in legal matters.
WT says apostates dont get anywhere, they can not get organized.etc.
$ could be a good incentive to get orgnized and get even.
filing a complaint in court is very easy. You can represent yourself easily
Every thing is routine
A great deal of litigation can be done in writting, you dont have to be a showman
Lawyers dont like what i am saying here
New York County Lawyers' Ass'n v. Dacey
, 283 N.Y.S.2d 984 (App.Div.), rev'd on the dissenting opinion, 287 N.Y.S.2d 422.hint1,
subcribe to PACER.
hint2
Read a good case from a-z
Lawyers are not genius, they just know the rules or are expected to know the rules..
a question for the legal beagles out there:.
since the watchtower thugs have told the press during the dateline repartee that barbara anderson was not being taken to task for her anti-molestation iniitatives, but alleged that she was being tried for ``allegations or serious sins'' unrelated to her activism, how strong a case would she have in court?.
bear in mind that barbara and the others of the dateline four say they did nothing more than speak for the protection of children and then publicly challenged the wt to publicly state their accusations and evidence, and that they would indemnify them against any charges arising therefrom.. so.... if they call her a sinner, say that her sin has nothing to do with whistle-blowing and is serious enough to merit expulsion -- as serious as adultery or theft, yet refuse to accept her challenge to show the world the basis of their charges if they are held harmless, how is that not libel and therefore actionable?
Dedication
$$$
and a GOOD lawyer will do it
BTW
WT is being supported, resting on a legal Dept., inside lawyers.
go to their jugular, moral and legally
hi lawyers of the gov body!.......how are you?.........by now there must be at least one of you that realizes the gov body's position on this issue is morally wrong........they are harboring pedophiles, and children are being molested and victimized........and you are defending them!........do you feel jehovah wants you to do that?...........think of the little children.........and what jehovah wants you to do.......... do you feel a loyalty to the gov body because they put you through law school?
who should you be loyal to?........
the gov body, or god?
can you talk to a programmed robot?
besides, lawyers tipically dont know how morality 'looks' like.
can you get at least one of those lawyer's resume.?
BTW
ethic code prohibits them from representing anyone whose purpose is to cause harm to someonelse, anyone could file against a lawyer
a good warfae strategic
a question for the legal beagles out there:.
since the watchtower thugs have told the press during the dateline repartee that barbara anderson was not being taken to task for her anti-molestation iniitatives, but alleged that she was being tried for ``allegations or serious sins'' unrelated to her activism, how strong a case would she have in court?.
bear in mind that barbara and the others of the dateline four say they did nothing more than speak for the protection of children and then publicly challenged the wt to publicly state their accusations and evidence, and that they would indemnify them against any charges arising therefrom.. so.... if they call her a sinner, say that her sin has nothing to do with whistle-blowing and is serious enough to merit expulsion -- as serious as adultery or theft, yet refuse to accept her challenge to show the world the basis of their charges if they are held harmless, how is that not libel and therefore actionable?
Serious sins:
no covering her head
no consulting her husband, women must not talk, do any questioning.
questioning the "slave"
did she took any wt documents, photocoies?, stealing
they could apply any new rule, even retroactively, like they did to Ray Franz.
Outside the religious context her case would be GOOD case but.
Of course there is a line to be drawn somewhere.
CAN A RELIGION physically KILL A MEMBER? wny not?
Can a religion kill a member morally, economically, professionally?
Constitution. Normally no one, not even a policeman, can restraint/detain you for any lenght of time without a court order.
But is restriction possible only by seising/holding a person physically?
thanx for your perspective yk.
often i've tried to explain the last days....but i'm not very good at self-expression.. i have a great fear for mankind.
we are so cruel to each other.
It is difficult to disassociate the messenger from the message.
It is also difficult to understand the mentallity of any person who seem happy at the inmediate perspective of seing more than 99% of the human race "blow to pieces", murdered, including his/her own children.
Regarding their profile, elements present are:
*is a looser at the personnal level
they wont have to be challenged after the end of the world
*historical mental inestability
worsesing with time or
obviously triying to hide their inestability
Look at the messengers and you will find more elements
for those who attended the sunday session of the district convention, did you notice that the un was not mentioned in the big buildup to the destruction of bablyon the great in the public talk.
only political elements or the governments were mentioned but not a word of the image of the wild beast, the united nations.
(dateline was only alluded to as well.
They are afraid of getting involve directly in politics, as they used to.
No names please.
They could feel the 911 heat, aproaching 1000 degrees.
i'm glad to see open frank discussion on the subject of violence within - or caused.
is seen as a recent provocation.
failure to appear has always been a df'ing in absentia.
