"judge" rutherford had only one son, named malcolm, who appears to have never said anything about his father.
this is strange.
one would think that someone would have interviewed malcolm about rutherford, if at least to ask him how he viewed rutherford.
Rutherfodr was a lawyer,
he knew what was known about him and the WT and who had that knowledge, close family member usually know...
an agreement ($ involved or not) can be reached, where you agreed not to talk about x matter (WT and or Rutherford)
Here are the consequences if you do not comply __________
Can any of you think of any other reason for thier silence after so many years?
the fleabites received for my speaking the absolute truth, almost entirely free from speculation, in:.
the thread found by clicking here would be hilarious if the matter at hand was not so serious.
i guess the biters generally display the poor reading and reasoning powers, and the huge desire to hero-worship ("my jehovah can beat up your jesus") that got so many embroiled in the cult of lies in the first place.... .
It has been said that child molestation was not a big problem 20 or 30 years ago...
What about oral sex. Anal sex, Bestiality,
Were any of the isssues big eunough ?
What did WT publixhed on each issue?
Was the WT balanced on the amount of material they published about the above mentioned issues?
If not, Why not?
Who was (were) responsible for requesting to the writting dept. to write about a particular subject.or policy?
How was it decided that a particular subject or matter had to be included (or omited) in the new publication or ariticle.
Was the written material reviewed and approved before printing?
Edited by - one on 3 November 2002 17:58:25
like carl olof jonsson, this is the first time i have ever written to this forum.
i have decided to do so, however, because i am saddened at what bill bowen has chosen to do in reference to ray franz.
let me say that i given bill full marks for publicizing an issue child abuse and the watchtower cover up of it and for taking a stand that has cost him a great deal personally.
To form an opinion it would hel to know:
What they say
What they did not say
What they said "between the lines"
Possible motives for all of the above,
But it takes time to find out.
had the usa known in advance that the wtc was going to be attacked, we could and should have taken preemptive action.
there was some 'fuzzy' knowledge that this might happen, but not enough to know the day or hour.
yet, we still could have should have done more to prepare.. we could wait until saddam hussein completes his weapons program, and then nukes a few cities to decide we have enough evidence on hand to go after him.
before i continue reading replies on page 2
Is this topic related to jw/wt?
how?,
any prophecy involved?
BTW
what wrong with jw desire to get rid of all govertments?
what wrong with usa wanting to get rid of some govertmentS?
mikepence posted this article over at bboy's forum and it's well worth bringing over here.
if i offend anyone - it's not my intention.
it is my intention to continue with helping to shed new light on this hideous crime.
good writting, finally
evidence is accumulating against the real target
PD
a WT lawyer or two may come out,
afraid of loosing his/her/their license (or due to better motive).
i knocked on the locked door of the appeal hearing last night after they had dismissed bill and told the six elders that i had something to say to them and told them it was summed up it a letter i had written.i then asked them if i could read it to them and they could have their own copy when i was finished.they said that would be fine.. here it is.
governing body,.
25 columbia heights.
cygnus,
Are you ok?
Why doesn't the WT stone to death any wrongdoer, (adultery)?
IT IS BIBLICAL!
Comnpare with the WT policy of two witness and no reporting to authorities.
we are going to have an extensive article in the new york times this sunday.
there is an early addition that comes out in most cities around on saturday.
i encourage one and all to get your copy and do not miss the important piece of history.
How will the WT reply?
They may place a FULL PAGE ad in the paper just like they did with tax issue in FRAnCE.
about those newspaper articles...
jw newspaper articles for dummies,
Most articles i have read so far lack something...
(according to the title, they should have subtitles, highlighted or properly located easy to spot key words)
'Who are contending'
'policy description'
'how it 'hides offenses''
sample case 1
sample case 2
'why ousted'
What is being done to...
-------------
twice a year? how about inner cities?
names other than PR director?
synonyms or other word to describe shunning"
(wt style)
PD
these people make a living just writting, i wonder what method they generally follow.
over the past few days some people have been talking about various electronics and gadgets and other stuff like that.
some of you have expressed interest in seeing what kind of stuff i have here and how my entertainment system works.
well, its not perfect and has many areas that could be improved upon but its still pretty inventive if you ask me.
to whom it may concern,
I am looking for for call forward device such as ol Radio Shack model CPS-200.
AND any (home made) device to interface to a moble (cell phone) phone....
for those who can't wait till sunday...
ousted members contend jehovah's witnesses' abuse policy hides offenses
by laurie goodstein
jw newspaper articles for dummies,
Most articles i have read so far lack something...
(according to the title, they should have subtitles, highlighted or properly located easy to spot key words)
'Who are contending'
'policy description'
'how it 'hides offenses''
sample case 1
sample case 2
'why ousted'
What is being done to...
-------------
twice a year? how about inner cities?
names other than PR director?
synonyms or other word to describe shunning"
(wt style)
PD
these people make a living just writting, i wonder what method they generally follow.
lets post lessons we have learned:.
i've learned that no matter how much i care, some people are just assholes.. .
i've learned that it takes years to build up trust, and only suspicion, not proof, to destroy it..
I've learned not to argue with unreasonable indiviudals, but i sitll have difficulty to quicly identify them.
