this is a rough draft of the talk follow the drama at the dc.
do you see any subliminal reference to dateline?
silentlambs.
A KEY TO ALWAYS REMEMBER ABOUT TRUTH IS -
Truth can never be "slander"
Truth can never be "false propoganda"
Truth can never cause harmful "divisions"
And Truth will never promate the interests of Satan
Jehovah has more than often used "strange" sources to promote the Truth
you may verify my authenticity through silentlambs.
my civil suit was 1st filed in 1996; withdrawn and re-filed in 1998. the present pleadings standing are the nov. 2000 "second substitute complaint".
the history of this case is extensive.
AS ALWAYS, THANKS CASSI - YOU'VE BEEN VERY KIND DURING MY POSTING!
YOU OBVIOUSLY HAVE WALKED IN MY SHOES (OR I IN YOURS) AS I'M SURE MANY OTHERS HAVE.
WHILE RESPONDING TO YOU I GO "Bttt"
I'm giving it one more try - is anyone interested; concerned?
I welcome feedback - suggestions?
If not, thanks all for having "read".
a friend
Edited by - Naomimara on 22 June 2002 3:41:34
i recall as a child going with several brothers to the local prison so the brothers, normally elders could go in and preach to the prisoners.. we as children would stay in the car for what seemed like hours while the brothers carried out whatever preaching work they deemed fit.
this also included return visits.. does this still go on today?
do the brothers still visit inmates at prisons?.
Hello Cassi...
Yes, here in CT, the the area I live, there are regular Bible studies going on in a maximum security facility. Referrals are made and new studies are started as often as needed. I've never heard of any sisters experience in this area in detention facilities.
Yours truly
hey kim norris,it would appear i owe you an appology.when i first saw your post i figured it was one of our board pranksters up to no good.now facts would bear out,your for real.i`am happy for that,this board can use more people who are concerned for abused children.you are a very welcome poster here.i appologize to you,for not checking you out before i made my post.i do hope you will stay...outlaw edited by - outlaw on 13 june 2002 23:13:35.
Atty. Norris,
If you have not yet read my post "PLEASE HELP - WT LAWSUIT PROGRESSING" you may want to take a minute to review it. My lawsuit was filed in early 1998 with regards to the present pleadings. While the abuse issues do not exclusively center around child molestation, the arguments of protecting and covering up the "crime" (battering) reveal much about the dynamics of the religious authority of "Watchtower" while at the same time the pleadings attempt to argue the Court's need to limit the First Amendment protection by secularizing the incidents alleged as opposed to generalizing 'religious protection' of them. Civil suits such as mine have been rare and therefore is being fought against aggressively, Watchtower is using two separate groups of lawyers to defend.
I posted approximately 9 PM ET on Sunday, June 16, 2002
As you see here, my post name is Naomimara
Today I recieved notice that the present attorney of record (he returned to the case last January when it became necessary to file an appellate brief) has requested another 30 day extension to file. We have a total of 3 judicial decisions, that of course are accessible through Lexus or Westlaw.
If I can be of any help or answer further questions, please feel free.
i heard from an old friend today - she is a young woman i knew from my last congregation.
i was asked to attend her bible study because we shared a profession and it was thought we would have something in common.
in fact, she was a very shy young woman shy and attractive, but not in the traditional, flashy way of many witness girls.
Dear Wasa,
Why not tell your friend about "Silentlambs". Be a bit discreet about it by implying that you recently heard about it and many of Jehovah's Witnesses have found it a good way to express feelings and interact for support. Assure her of Bill Bowen's technical 'still in good standing' position. Remind her that getting angry and speaking out about bad people does not constitute not loving God. Tell her how some abused persons went so far as to take up prostitution or the like for a time in order to cope with their circumstances, therefore she may feel a little less self-condemned. After all what is done is done but if she truly feels that she needs to take responsibility for personal poor choices and decisions, the best encouragement she can have is to feel others want to help. She obviously has a friend in you. Good for you!
from,
Happy - Sad, but always moving forward.
a victory indeed to fight at all costs ($) this supreme court battle over door-to-door permits.
who now though would volunteer to work that territory.
of course, the fight was for a higher issue that protects anonimous callers in general, but i couldn't help commenting on what the "air" in the village of stratton must be like today!
Hello all,
You know that pride is before a crash.
I was amused at patio34's offering the quote that the 'Supreme Court Justices saw the importance of the public ministry'. I heard a few of the remarks of the Justices at an earlier time and I don't think they were much concerned about the 'ministry'.
And Invisible's encouragement to give Stratton a fuller picture. Surely many, beyond Stratton's village limits are getting a fuller picture.
Perhaps this is Jehovah's direction all in all. To strain out the gnat and gulp down the camel is suicidal. Sure our rights of free speech are important, even this "evil" world recognizes that. But if we preach free and anonymous speech as being important while in the darkness of our inner circles torture and maim innocent persons, including 'inhibiting their free speech', WOE!
you may verify my authenticity through silentlambs.
my civil suit was 1st filed in 1996; withdrawn and re-filed in 1998. the present pleadings standing are the nov. 2000 "second substitute complaint".
the history of this case is extensive.
Dear Cassi...
I will always try to answer questions; actually encourage them. If I cannot, I'll do my best to offer an explanation why not.
1.) There was no criminal investigation years ago for several reasons. In the state of Connecticut, issues regarding child abuse (violence) and wife battering (physical and psychological), unless there was lots of blood or dangling limbs, would be minimized as a problem that should be addressed through family, therapy or religion. This is not to say that there were not state departments that would investigate, but up until the late 1980's, the support groups and high profile recognition that we see today did not exist. Of course, my primary reason for not reporting should be obvious to the readers of JWD. It was a sin to air dirty laundry to any that were not in a position of congregation oversight. Furthermore, and you'll see if you read the entire legal 'complaint' that there is a very insidious way to carry out violence so that few marks show!
2.) The lawsuit is against WTBTS, et al. The named Defendants are 4 (still prominent) elders.
3.) The legal 'complaint' states physical and psychological abuse against mother and child and briefly makes mention of sexual abuses. I cannot comment further on that because my son, who is not or never became one of JWs, is working his way to be able to come forward to testify. As you know, not speaking about a matter means not having to think on or relive the matter.
I hope this was helpful.
a friend
a victory indeed to fight at all costs ($) this supreme court battle over door-to-door permits.
who now though would volunteer to work that territory.
of course, the fight was for a higher issue that protects anonimous callers in general, but i couldn't help commenting on what the "air" in the village of stratton must be like today!
A victory indeed to fight at all costs ($) this Supreme Court battle over door-to-door permits. Who now though would volunteer to work that territory. Of course, the fight was for a higher issue that protects anonimous callers in general, but I couldn't help commenting on what the "air" in the Village of Stratton must be like today! Tar and feather now, ask questions later?
you may verify my authenticity through silentlambs.
my civil suit was 1st filed in 1996; withdrawn and re-filed in 1998. the present pleadings standing are the nov. 2000 "second substitute complaint".
the history of this case is extensive.
THANK YOU BILL, CASSI..., FOR VERIFYING AND ALSO, FOR OTHER'S EXPRESSIONS!
Edited by - Naomimara on 18 June 2002 0:7:26
you may verify my authenticity through silentlambs.
my civil suit was 1st filed in 1996; withdrawn and re-filed in 1998. the present pleadings standing are the nov. 2000 "second substitute complaint".
the history of this case is extensive.
There is one more thing I forgot to say. This is the first time that I've ever been on a chat and posting site like this. To Celtic Mark, I didn't know what I was doing when I went live. Therefore, I ask that all be patient with me as I master better how to use the forum. Thanks!
