Donkey,
If someone reads from alternative sources that don't fit within the mainstream,does that automatically identify them with the authors whom they learn from?
This is what Cookie asked. But when you answered:
I see nothing wrong with identifying someone with their written views.
You had misunderstood her question. What she was asking, in essence, is if, for example, someone reads Marx's writings and becomes a believer in the theory of Communism, does that automatically make the reader a fellow Communist?
In your answer, when you said "...identifying someone with their written views," (emphasis added), the person in the above example now believes in Communism, but that belief does not make s/he a Communist. But using the reasoning behind your reply one would be justified in calling the new believer an actual Communist. It's a small difference I know, but the gap between what Cookie asked and what you thought she meant would widen over time.
On another topic...when Jim quoted a reply you'd made about him probably being a gay hater...I have to agree with you that you didn't call him one (because of the word "probably"). Hinted at, yes, but actually stated, no.
My pretax $.02