Hi Jeffro !
It must be damned annoying with all the work you put in to your 607 Pages not to have due attribution ! It is downright rude !
I read a bit again of your excellent work and this jumped out of the page at me :
" Taken literally,* the narrative of Daniel chapter 4 provides no reason for the ‘seven times’ to apply to any period other than a lesson of humility for the king of Babylon, Nebuchadnezzar II. The chapter specifically indicates the intended interpretation, and there are no unresolved elements in the story that warrant any additional interpretation."
The realisation of the truth of this was what propelled me in to fully waking up. One day, for no real reason in those days, I decided to sit down and read some of the Bible with no preconceived ideas, no Watchtower Spectacles on, I flipped open my Bible at "Daniel" and when I got to Chapter 4 and read it as never before in my life, exactly what you say above was my conclusion, all of a sudden the J.W org. "teaching", which is of course a House of Cards, tumbled down.
I had awoken ! I then made a study of much more of the J.W "teaching", and within a short time my Default Setting was " if they teach it, it is wrong", that rarely was found wanting !
May I thank you for the excellent work you have done, and for sharing your knowledge on here, You , and others like "Ann O'Malley" helped me understand so much that I was able to confound a very crafty J.W apologist who seemingly had "proof" of the 607 BCE nonsense.
Thank you again for your work, and contributions here, so often you "cut through the crap" and make a salient and very informed point or two where us lesser humans are in error !