Posts by peacefulpete

25

Jesus the Maintenance Man

by peacefulpete in

i posted on another thread what i thought was an interesting angle, seldom discussed regarding the role of god/logos in holding creation together and its maintenance.

most moderns think of the universe as a self-perpetuating machine, but ancients looked to the god/s to ensure order continued and fertility returned year after year.

we read, throughout the ot, of jews performing prescribed ritual and festivals to ensure god's blessing and providence.

Again I apologize for the tone. Thinking back, I'm guessing the other persona was your Catholic wife. As I remember she described you as 'autistic savant'. Perhaps that explains somethings. Either way, you obviously have much to share but be mindful that you may be asked to defend your comments, try not to mistake that for an attack on your Jewishness.

25

Jesus the Maintenance Man

by peacefulpete in

i posted on another thread what i thought was an interesting angle, seldom discussed regarding the role of god/logos in holding creation together and its maintenance.

most moderns think of the universe as a self-perpetuating machine, but ancients looked to the god/s to ensure order continued and fertility returned year after year.

we read, throughout the ot, of jews performing prescribed ritual and festivals to ensure god's blessing and providence.

peacefulpete

It was a respectful request. One I was sure you'd honor given how polite constructive dialog is like 'eating dirt' for you. I have not given you reason for offense. You turned a polite disagreement into a personal and Semitic attack. You've used multiple IDs and feigned being a sexually assaulted woman before which throws much of what you say into question. With this persona you claimed in past posts to be a professional academic; all I ask is that you act like one here.

This is no longer enjoyable. I'm stepping away to learn from real academics who don't have chip on their shoulders.

25

Jesus the Maintenance Man

by peacefulpete in

i posted on another thread what i thought was an interesting angle, seldom discussed regarding the role of god/logos in holding creation together and its maintenance.

most moderns think of the universe as a self-perpetuating machine, but ancients looked to the god/s to ensure order continued and fertility returned year after year.

we read, throughout the ot, of jews performing prescribed ritual and festivals to ensure god's blessing and providence.

peacefulpete

If you cannot offer helpful guidance or at least support your conclusions, then I respectfully request you not post on my threads or respond to my comments.

25

Jesus the Maintenance Man

by peacefulpete in

i posted on another thread what i thought was an interesting angle, seldom discussed regarding the role of god/logos in holding creation together and its maintenance.

most moderns think of the universe as a self-perpetuating machine, but ancients looked to the god/s to ensure order continued and fertility returned year after year.

we read, throughout the ot, of jews performing prescribed ritual and festivals to ensure god's blessing and providence.

peacefulpete

Why do you feel I am anything but fascinated with the Jewish culture and history? How else am I to learn other than reading and discussing it? This is a discussion forum after all. If you see me making a factual error, then correct it using sources I can read and learn from. I do believe our coming from different perspectives is an opportunity for both of us. My own research for the past 25 years is likely to have included things you may not have encountered. I'm sorry if that sounds condescending because that is not where it is coming from.

I'll remind you of your wise comments about JWs not thinking for themselves or developing deeper perception. If I just take your word at things, how am I growing?

A last thought. If I disagree with you on a matter of history I am not disagreeing with all Jews. You have repeatedly emphasized there never was, nor is there, a consensus on many matters of interpretation and practice.

25

Jesus the Maintenance Man

by peacefulpete in

i posted on another thread what i thought was an interesting angle, seldom discussed regarding the role of god/logos in holding creation together and its maintenance.

most moderns think of the universe as a self-perpetuating machine, but ancients looked to the god/s to ensure order continued and fertility returned year after year.

we read, throughout the ot, of jews performing prescribed ritual and festivals to ensure god's blessing and providence.

peacefulpete

It seems Antigonus is notable for a couple things, his Greek name betrays the extent of early Greek influence right around the time of Alexander and his choice to use "heaven' rather than "God" is regarded as a theology of transcendence. (The second translation above is a paraphrase, I noted the difference in the two translations and found a discussion that understood the word choice significant.)

The expression "Heaven" for "God" is the oldest evidence in postexilic Judaism of the development of the idea of a transcendental Deity.

The Jewish Spiritual Heroes, Volume I; The Creators of the Mishna, Antigonos of Socho 3 with Connections ANTIGONUS OF SOKO - JewishEncyclopedia.com

25

Jesus the Maintenance Man

by peacefulpete in

i posted on another thread what i thought was an interesting angle, seldom discussed regarding the role of god/logos in holding creation together and its maintenance.

most moderns think of the universe as a self-perpetuating machine, but ancients looked to the god/s to ensure order continued and fertility returned year after year.

we read, throughout the ot, of jews performing prescribed ritual and festivals to ensure god's blessing and providence.

peacefulpete

I apologize for my tone. I do not however understand your condescension.

Regarding the sole quotation from Antogonos of Socho, every other form I have found words the quote similar to this:

"Be not like servants who serve their master for the sake of reward; rather, be like servants who do not serve their master for the sake of reward, and let the awe of Heaven be upon you" (Artscroll translation).

or

"Be not like slaves who serve their master for their daily rations; be like those who serve their master without regard to emoluments, and let the fear of God be with you."

How does this suggest he did not believe in prayers of invocation?

25

Jesus the Maintenance Man

by peacefulpete in

i posted on another thread what i thought was an interesting angle, seldom discussed regarding the role of god/logos in holding creation together and its maintenance.

most moderns think of the universe as a self-perpetuating machine, but ancients looked to the god/s to ensure order continued and fertility returned year after year.

we read, throughout the ot, of jews performing prescribed ritual and festivals to ensure god's blessing and providence.

peacefulpete

Matther 6 comes from bits and pieces of the Jewish liturgy.

Yes, that is what I said.

....elements in the Lord's Prayer (in all its versions) are perfectly consistent with the Kadish and Amidah.

I do not, like Peacefulpete says, imagine that the Old Testament prayers were some "psychological tools for self help." They meant what they said, in the genre that they were composed, but words mean what they mean. People in the past believed that they talked to deities, not merely worshiped them....He got that very wrong indeed.

I did not say you believed what I said was anachronistic. I said it would be anachronistic to impose a modern Reformed understanding of the value of prayer upon ancient texts. So, we agree. The discussion is about what ancient Jews felt about prayer. As you said they believed they were talking to the deities, and yes that included petitions for sun,rain,food, and security.

Peacefulpete doesn't understand what I mean or comprehend where I come from. He thinks he does.

No, Peacefulpete has no interest in where you come from, he has interest in the evolving nature of ancient religion. At times you have offered valuable input.

Peacefulpete, the Butcher of JWD

404

Is Jesus the Creator?

by Sea Breeze in

that's what the word says.

.

colossians 1:16. for by him all things were created, both in the heavens and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or rulers or authorities—all things have been created through him and for him..

peacefulpete

Well since we are being blunt. I was addressing that to SBF and illustrating the logos concept. I was not describing the Trinity. You also seem to just wish to argue, as I made very clear the theological point that God was not diminished by his emanations. Maybe that is how you can type 970 words in less than 9 minutes. You don't read the comment you are responding to.

404

Is Jesus the Creator?

by Sea Breeze in

that's what the word says.

.

colossians 1:16. for by him all things were created, both in the heavens and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or rulers or authorities—all things have been created through him and for him..

peacefulpete

Think of the fully developed Logos concept this way. If I break off a piece of my Kit-Kat bar, for the action of sharing,

1. That piece is not the whole bar. The bar is greater than the piece. That piece is not THE Kit-Kat bar, but it is at the same time, Kit-Kat bar.

2. It is also true that, the piece exists because of the bar. Before the piece was broken free, it did not exist.

The biggest difference between the Logos concept and my Kit-Kat bar, is that the bar is finite while God (Most High) was conceived of as infinite. The breaking off a piece diminishes my bar but the Most High was not thought of as diminished through his emanations.

Think deeply about this and you will understand 2000 years of theology.

404

Is Jesus the Creator?

by Sea Breeze in

that's what the word says.

.

colossians 1:16. for by him all things were created, both in the heavens and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or rulers or authorities—all things have been created through him and for him..

peacefulpete

He rejects the idea that the Logos is “God most high” in the sense of being the Father but affirms the Logos’ full divinity

Yes, that is correct. That is the very definition of the Logos concept. Logos was God in action/at work in the material world. It/He was not the sum of all of the Most High.

SBF...you are also correct that coeternity/coequality with the Father is not found in the NT or most pre-Nicaean Christianity. Before time, the Most High was without emanations. Most early writers held something much closer to the Logos conception of deity.