Ascension of Isaiah
7:
21. And I fell on my face to worship him, but the angel who conducted me did not permit me, but said unto me: "Worship neither throne nor angel which belongs to the six heavens - for for this cause I was sent to conduct thee j- until I tell thee in the seventh heaven.
8:
4. And I said to the angel who conducted me: "What is this which I see, my Lord?"
5. And he said: "I am not thy lord, but thy fellow servant."
9:
6. And the second whom I saw was on he left of my Lord. And I asked: "Who is this?" and he said unto me: "Worship Him, for He is the angel of the Holy Spirit, who speaketh in thee and the rest of the righteous."
I suspect the Ascension of Isaiah is underappreciated as an early Christian work. Some have suggested it was a Jewish work redacted by a Christian much like Revelation. Anyway, the story is complex with many levels of angels and beings, the highest level 'angels' are worshipped, who then in turn worship the Christ, who then worships El most High.
It's a clear parallel to Revelation with the lower angel objecting to being referred to as Lord and directing worship to another.
(But note that Isaiah continues to do so, like John in Rev repeats his attempt to worship, which is odd. Perhaps the objection in Rev isn't an emendation but served an angelological purpose?)
Is the objection in Rev 19 and 22 parallel in that the lower angel's objecting is due to his station? Other greater angels are described in a much more theophanic manner in Revelation much like in the A of I, perhaps suggesting higher rank or as stand-ins for the Most High. I don't know.
The development of angels is a complicated and long process. They became characters in their own right in Jewish and Christian mythology, not just as emanations.