if you consider that the god they believe in:.
- cannot be seen or heard and is only known in books written by writers we do not know nor do we have the original writings- does not listen to prayers from believers for security, safety, health, survival, protection, rescue, food etc- promises things that have not come true though had plenty of time to act on the promises- does not provide what you need to live- let's you suffer, struggle, work etc equal to non-believers, treated equally.
........ how does a believer look at his/her parents if they hide themselves, do not provide for you (shelter, food etc), make promises but never live up to these, does not provide what you need to live, treats you like anyone else but not as their child?
Look, I don't care what Cofty thinks about my post. It stands as it does.
People have a right to not believe in anything once they leave and to believe when they leave the Watchtower.
There are no definitives.
We are free to make our own ways.
If he wants to return us to "black-and-white" ways, as if there facts, let him draw them out, and you can follow him as your god or leader.
Let Cofty be your guide.
if you consider that the god they believe in:.
- cannot be seen or heard and is only known in books written by writers we do not know nor do we have the original writings- does not listen to prayers from believers for security, safety, health, survival, protection, rescue, food etc- promises things that have not come true though had plenty of time to act on the promises- does not provide what you need to live- let's you suffer, struggle, work etc equal to non-believers, treated equally.
........ how does a believer look at his/her parents if they hide themselves, do not provide for you (shelter, food etc), make promises but never live up to these, does not provide what you need to live, treats you like anyone else but not as their child?
Prove, objectively, that you have the ability to determine I do not care about what is "objectively true" in the question.
I would love to see how you can do that from all the way over there...
if you consider that the god they believe in:.
- cannot be seen or heard and is only known in books written by writers we do not know nor do we have the original writings- does not listen to prayers from believers for security, safety, health, survival, protection, rescue, food etc- promises things that have not come true though had plenty of time to act on the promises- does not provide what you need to live- let's you suffer, struggle, work etc equal to non-believers, treated equally.
........ how does a believer look at his/her parents if they hide themselves, do not provide for you (shelter, food etc), make promises but never live up to these, does not provide what you need to live, treats you like anyone else but not as their child?
Why believe in a god?
I guess people do it because they aren't Jehovah's Witnesses and aren't under the influence of the Governing Body that tells them what they can and cannot believe in.
Sure, it might seem silly to you and even against reason. But people don't have to listen to you (or anybody, for that matter).
And especially not those idiot men that act like Puppet Masters via the Watchtower publications and tell people what they should and should not wear, should and should not do, should and should not think, and should and should not believe in.
When you don't live under a harsh, ugly, and controlling system like that, you have what is called freedom.
With freedom I can believe in anything that isn't real, like Santa Claus, the Easter Bunny, even the US Congress--well, uh, maybe scratch the last one. But you get my drift.
It's great that you have found freedom and have come to your own conclusions. But in a world of freedom you will also have to get used to the fact that people don't give a flying fuck about what you believe (or don't believe) as long as you respect their customs and convictions.
If you don't, you're messing with that freedom you're cherishing right now. That's why people hate the fuck out of the Watchtower and the Jehovah's Witnesses. They want to put everyone under their mighty thumb, extinguish freedom of thought, destroy other customs and convictions, and just make everyone wear the same uniform and think the same way.
Do you want everyone to think like you? You can't have it both ways. Freedom doesn't allow for that.
Why believe in a god? Because you are free to do so when you are outside of the control of a system that says you can't do anything but their way, that's why.
i'm actually embarrassed to say i watched the everything everywhere all at once movie on a plane.
kung fu with butt plugs and dildoes with a storyline impossible to follow.
i can't believe michelle yeoh agreed to it.
Everything Everwhere All at Once may not be everyone's piece of cake. A friend of mine did not like it either but enjoyed Tar far more, another choice for best picture, which was perhaps a lot more disturbing of a film to some since it deals with a fictional character at the center of cancel culture (what they must go to when "ignoring it all").
But Everything Everwhere..., despite all the craziness, is simply about a mother who could have lived all these various other lives, where in other worlds were far more special, but when given the choice to suddenly do so, choses to live the simpler life of living as a struggling business owner, in a marriage that has been struggling, carring for an aging father, and learning to love a lesbian daughter and her new girlfriend--something that comes new to her. As described by one of the directors: "I wanted to put my mom in The Matrix."
what does the mandate to "abstain from blood" mean for jehovah's witnesses freed from the control of the governing body?.
it had previously been understood that the best translation of acts 15: 28-30 was "to abstain from blood.
" however, a careful analysis of the passage shows that the best translation of this passage is "to abstain from (shedding) blood," where the word "pour out," which does not appear in ancient manuscripts and other biblical versions, does.it appears there understood in elliptical form.in the same way it happened in the case of colossians 1: 16-20 where the new world translation of the holy scriptures correctly inserted the word "other" several times, understood there in elliptical form, in the phrase of the original greek "all things ", thus obtaining the correct translation" all (other) things ".even though christianity reaffirms itself in translating this passage as saying that "through him all things were created", because he maintains that jesus is god according to his pagan doctrine of the trinity, multiple biblical passages sustainthe biblical truth that jesus is not jehovah god, but his beloved son that god later used as his creative partner.according to this paul said that "though he existed in the form of god, he did not give consideration to a usurpation, namely, that he should be equal to god, no, rather, he emptied himself and took the form of a slave and he came to be in the likeness of men, more than that, when he was in the manner of a man, he humbled himself and became obedient to death, yes, death on a torture stake, for this same reason, also, god he exalted a superior position and kindly gave him the name that is above all else, so that in jesus' name every knee of those [who are] in heaven and those who are [over] the earth and those [who are] under the ground, and openly recognize * every tongue that jesus christ is lord for the glory of god the father.
Welcome Christianhonest.
From my days as a religion teacher (I am now retired) I can say you are correct. You would have received an A in my class.
Acts 15.28-29 is actually the proclamation of the earlier discussion in verses 19-21. There the council is discussing what seems to be the Noahide Laws.
We have to shed our Watchtower upbringing--completely throw it away--and think about what is happening here. This is a Jewish congregation of practicing Jews that followed the Torah, 100%, living in Jerusalem, practicing at the Temple itself, observing kashrut of all things (eating kosher--see Acts 10 for how Peter tells God in a vision he won't eat the non-kosher animals God offers him even though Peter is hungry).
The only difference between this congregation is that they believe the Jewish Messiah has come, in the person of Jesus of Nazareth, that is all. They don't even yet believe he is divine or that Gentiles came in. Right now they are kind of not sure who this "Paul" guy even is.
They do Jewish--and in a big way, and if you read the rest of Acts and history, Jewish Christians will keep doing this until the Bar Kokhba revolt in the 130s CE...and then the Jerusalem church goes down with the rest of the Jews.
This is important because the Jews aren't concerned about telling the Gentiles not to drink blood. Think about it. It's the exact same thing that happens with Jews and Christians today, nothing is changing.
If you ask a Jew if they think a Gentile can get into the Afterlife (if there is one--Jews aren't decided or sure on that), they are decided on one thing: just follow the Noahide Laws.
Remember that they've decided not to impose the laws of kashrut (or kosher) upon the Gentiles, meaning they are not going to be discussing what not to eat, so obviously the laws are going to be light on the discussion on dietary restrictions.
In verse 20, James proposes the following, likely due to four elements found in Pagan (that is Roman, not heathen, which is non-Roman or Hellenistic, which is Greek) worship, so that Gentiles refrain from:
Things polluted by idols
Incest (the Greek word pornia means illegal or improper sexual activity)
Eating Inhumanely (Consuming living and strangled creatures showed disrespect for life)
Bloodshed (Justice; shedding blood and from failing to establish justice)
Leviticus 17-18 makes similar demands of non-citizens who choose to dwell in the land, so it seems that this is what they were using as a basis for their decision-making.
We also have to take into account that the Book of Acts was finalized in Koine Greek. The events took place in Aramaic and Biblical Hebrew. So the words you read in English are translations of translations.
That means "abstain from blood" is a Hebrewism and not a Hellenism or Greek expression. You have to remember to read it that way, as Christianhonest wisely points out.
This is a Jewish council of rabbis. James is a rabbi, not a "Christian priest" or "elder." While this came to be known as the Jerusalem Church and it disappeared in 135 CE during the Bar Kokhba revolt, it was really a Jewish establishment that thought of itself as a Jewish council with one exception, that they found the Jewish Messiah. They thus did everything else by the Jewish book, and we here made exceptions for Gentiles so they could worship in ways different from them.
So you have to read Acts not like a Jehovah's Witness. You have to read it like a Greek translation of a Jewish world.
“1975” still marks 6000 years from the creation of adam in wt calendar.
according to “all scriptures inspired” book, there is a gap between the creation of adam and the creation of eve and her marriage to adam.
it was at that point in time when eve was created that marked the end of the 6th creative day and the beginning of god’s rest, the 7th day as recorded in genesis.
A footnote:
This is why C.T. Russell made his announcement that the Gentile Times ended in October of 1914 and the Annual Meeting takes place in the Autumn.
Russell believed that the Gentile Times ended on Rosh Hashanah, according to his calculations, in 1914 of that year.
And the Annual Meeting was set to occur on the same date too. This was based on the calculations made by the SDA church that holds their celebrations of Jewish festivals for their Christian congregations. Sometimes they do these things according to the Jewish calendar, but sometimes they, like Russell, believe the Jews have it wrong. (Nisan 14 is one of those other calculations that Russell believed the SDA church over the Jews.)
But the Creation, according to Jewish tradition (and JW theology) is in the autumn of the year--and that is also noted in the "Sons of God" book where 1975 first appears--and now you know why.
“1975” still marks 6000 years from the creation of adam in wt calendar.
according to “all scriptures inspired” book, there is a gap between the creation of adam and the creation of eve and her marriage to adam.
it was at that point in time when eve was created that marked the end of the 6th creative day and the beginning of god’s rest, the 7th day as recorded in genesis.
I think one of the reasons they may have stopped is because they ran into some problem calculating what a "day" actually stood for.
In Genesis each "day" is basically "evening" until "morning" as in Genesis 1.5 which states "and there was evening and there was morning, a first day."
It doesn't even say if this was a 12-hour day. 12-hour days only occur at certain times of the year from certain places on the surface of the globe. According to Jewish tradition, this was Rosh Hashanah: autumn, and there are no 12-hour days in the autumn from evening to morning.
To add to this paradox the Hebrews did not believe that the earth was a sphere in Genesis chapter one but a flat platter over which a half bowl was tossed over, the firmament, upon which the sun, moon, and stars were affixed. This firmament kept out the heavenly or cosmos of waters from falling upon the earth (the dividing of the waters above from the waters below was established by the firmament which was named "sky", remember?)...
So there was no globe or hemisphere over which to pinpoint a spot for seasons for 12 or 24-hour days to calculate and divide the years to start the march of prophetic years the Millerites had divised and that Franz had pulled out of the old hat to come up with 1975.
Like the Mormons have done with many of their old teachings and some of the failed prophecies, the Watchtower stops talking about things and hopes that people forget. The less people talk about stuff, the less people remember. The less they remember, the less it becomes considers official teaching.
That's the way it works in Mormonland. And that's the way 1975 has been working in Watchtowerland too.
If you try to dig it up, people shrug. And it doesn't work when you compare it to both critical academic theology and tradition teachings. Watchtower likes it that way. They learned this little trick from the Mormon leadership.
So you won't hear anymore speculations about Biblical creative days anytime soon...or probably ever again.
“1975” still marks 6000 years from the creation of adam in wt calendar.
according to “all scriptures inspired” book, there is a gap between the creation of adam and the creation of eve and her marriage to adam.
it was at that point in time when eve was created that marked the end of the 6th creative day and the beginning of god’s rest, the 7th day as recorded in genesis.
I have a moment to add before I close and I don't want to add much further.
I was born a Jew, left in the hands of my JW aunt for 10 years, and returned to Judaism as an adult.
"Chumash" is a codex as opposed to a scroll which is a "sofer."
Etymologically speaking, chumash came into Yiddish/Askenazi usasge from Hebrew since the Hebrew word for five is also "chumash" and in a codex, the Torah is divided into "fifths," namely Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy.
And Jews do not, repeat, not see the Torah and the Talmud as the same.
“1975” still marks 6000 years from the creation of adam in wt calendar.
according to “all scriptures inspired” book, there is a gap between the creation of adam and the creation of eve and her marriage to adam.
it was at that point in time when eve was created that marked the end of the 6th creative day and the beginning of god’s rest, the 7th day as recorded in genesis.
When used for a book, it's actually Yiddish, not Hebrew.
I'm a Jew. The Hebrew word for five, got coined by the Askhenazi Jews as a term for a codex Torah.
I speak and pray in Hebrew, Ladino, and Yiddish.
I am a practing Reconstructionist Jew
I am not going to debate further. I have a flight to catch
“1975” still marks 6000 years from the creation of adam in wt calendar.
according to “all scriptures inspired” book, there is a gap between the creation of adam and the creation of eve and her marriage to adam.
it was at that point in time when eve was created that marked the end of the 6th creative day and the beginning of god’s rest, the 7th day as recorded in genesis.
Fisherman,
Actually, "chumash" is a technical term, and while I understand what you personally mean, it is not an exclusive synonym for "Torah." It means "codex" or a book in codex form. It often is used for a book like the Torah in codex format, but can also mean the Hebrew or even the Christian Bible in codex format as opposed to scrolls.
Reform Jews have not traditionally taught that the Torah was allegorical as whole, since it does not contain merely narratives, and not all of its narratives are the same. Some of its narratives are mythology and some are folklore and the rest is law. Allegory does not apply to folklore nor to all forms of mythology.
There are also strands of history--very little--and, since 1999, there are some Reform scholars who now believe that some of the events described are more historical that Reform has held to be myth. A great change happened in that movement where English (or the vernacular) was dropped and Hebrew was adopted as well as tradtional garb and traditions were reincorporated in imitation of Reconstructionism. (The claim was a rising "response to secularism.") Alongside this has been a growing view of more traditionalism in view of the Biblical narrative in Reform Judaism. Some are even reconsidering the historicity of the Exodus.
