"I am an idiot because I chat online with idiots. You are too if you read this."
--Made You Look 1:1, from I Feel So Grown Up To Make Pee-Pee Quotes from the Bible, I Must Have the IQ of A Jar Of Mayo
KalebOutWest
JoinedPosts by KalebOutWest
-
543
Encouraging scriptures for the day
by Kosonen inhello my friends,.
here are some encouraging scriptures for the day:.
revelation 21:2 i also saw the holy city, new jerusalem, coming down out of heaven from god and prepared as a bride adorned for her husband.. hebrews 11:10 for he (abraham) was awaiting the city having real foundations, whose designer and builder is god.. revelation 21:24 and the nations will walk by means of its light, and the kings of the earth will bring their glory into it.. revelation 22:1 and he showed me a river of water of life, clear as crystal, flowing out from the throne of god and of the lamb 2 down the middle of its main street (of the holy city).
-
-
-
49
Will the GB Eventually "observe" Tithing?
by Sea Breeze infound this on fb from the recent losch talk.
time for a new business model?.
.
-
-
KalebOutWest
Earnest, wrote in reply to my earlier comment on that the ancient Jews did keep track on who paid tithes and how this was mentioned in the Talmud, stating:
The Talmud contains the oral traditions of the Pharisees from the Second Temple period. After the destruction of the temple in 70 it was only rabbinical Judaism that remained to reconstruct the religious system. If we rely on the Bible rather than rabbinical Judaism then there is no indication that the tithe was monitored.
First, I was not stating that the Jews were following the Talmud, but that the Talmud states and goes into detail that the Jews have always kept track of this via a system. A tractate is based on this system, I mentioned, and claiming that this tradition was preserved, it was written first in the Mishnah.
This got later transfered into the Talmud and became the tractate known as Ma'aserot.
Second, Jehovah's Witnesses teach that the Biblical record is historical, and that Solomon's Temple (and even Moses' Tabernacle) existed, including the tithing system of that era. But both history and the Jews say that Solomon's Temple is more legendary than history.
It was more of a shrine in competition during an era when the Hebrews were clearly worshipping various idol deities. Only after the Babylonian Exile did the cult of YHWH survive and did the tithing system to the kohens become the mainstay of Jewish religion at that point in history, with Ezra, a genuine historical figure, directing the rewriting of religious history making the creative changes to what people know today.
While this is not what Jehovah's Witnesses learn (and may be shocking to even some ex-JWs), it is what mainstream Christians read in their study Bibles and the basics you learn in Hebrew school.
So yes, the rabbis did kinda invent the tithing system, because the ancient Jews did not keep account of it in the "Biblical" days.
But in reality, there were no "Biblical" days. The stories before the return from Babylon are all legends, folklore, and myth. There is a bit of history, but most is colored by these type of stories. Think of it like American history, including tales of George Washington chopping the cherry tree down as a kid, Betsy Ross creating the first American flag, Paul Revere making his midnight ride and crying out, "The British are coming! The British are coming!"--all of which never happened in US history...just American myths.
But when the tithes started to get paid--yep, the Jews did indeed keep track of them.
If we rely on the Bible rather than rabbinical Judaism...
I'd be careful about that Bible you are relying on. A bunch of rabbis wrote and edited that thing too.
-
49
Will the GB Eventually "observe" Tithing?
by Sea Breeze infound this on fb from the recent losch talk.
time for a new business model?.
.
-
-
KalebOutWest
I see it being repeated here and especially since the new arrangement on NOT keeping time, that the ancient Jews (and I guess modern) don't and never did have a system for checking on who paid their tithes...
I may be a JW, but I have Jewish parents and thus I went to Hebrew School for 10 years. The Governing Body lied. The ancient Jews sure did check on who paid their tithes and who did not throughout ancient history, and they kept this system going until modern times. It is in the Talmud.
And they make you study about it as a kid (which most think is boring). In fact this whole thing on how and what to pay and offer was so detailed (because it had to be memorized back in the day due to so few Jews could not read or write in the Bronze Age) that it eventually became what is known as a tractate of the Mishnah known as Ma'aserot. For centuries and generations this tractate was used by the rabbis to dictate how to pay to the kohen (the priests) to ensure that each person paid the right amount of what came to each kohen so they could survive. Even after the Second Temple fell, this system was still in use because the kohen played a major part in synagogue services until the Reform movement came about in the 1880s.
Today, modern Jews must pay--that is "must"--a membership fee to belong to a synagogue, community, or Jewish movement as Jewish law teaches such a stipend is deserved and only right, and the fee is registered, monitored, and carefully noted because Jews are under the Mosaic Law (for the most part), even though Ma'aserot is no longer in effect outside of Orthodox Judaism--and the law teaches such a thing.
So the Governing Body is lying about their "basis" for removal of the hours reporting requirement. (On a scriptural basis for giving a report to Jesus after being in the ministry, see Luke 10:1 and 17.)
-
543
Encouraging scriptures for the day
by Kosonen inhello my friends,.
here are some encouraging scriptures for the day:.
revelation 21:2 i also saw the holy city, new jerusalem, coming down out of heaven from god and prepared as a bride adorned for her husband.. hebrews 11:10 for he (abraham) was awaiting the city having real foundations, whose designer and builder is god.. revelation 21:24 and the nations will walk by means of its light, and the kings of the earth will bring their glory into it.. revelation 22:1 and he showed me a river of water of life, clear as crystal, flowing out from the throne of god and of the lamb 2 down the middle of its main street (of the holy city).
-
-
KalebOutWest
The passage of Isaiah 13:9-16, like all Jewish oracles, deal with something the prophet saw in their past or were living through. Unfortunately people exposed to the theology of the Watchtower might still hold to the view that the writers were claiming to see the future.
The passage that Queequeg cites is not about God killing infants but about "Isaiah" writing a commentary on what happened to and around the nations of Israel and Judah during and after their exiles based on theology that, interestingly, all denominations of Judaism (including Orthodoxy) currently rejects.
The theology (which is likely that of Second or Third Isaiah) is that God punishes nations for their sins by bringing losses in wars upon them.
The words of Isaiah 13 describe what are supposed to be an eyewitness account lamenting the fall of Babylon after the manner of the fall of Nineveh. But the details are wrong. In fact it's "total destruction" descriptions are just poetic--as are likely the "infants" being "dashed to pieces" and the "wives being ravished" in verse 16 as the original invasion of the Persians was sudden and rather peaceful, and its was only during the Babylonian revolt that happened later wherein the Babylonians themselves took their own lives to keep from falling into the hands of the Persians (with some Babylonians strangling their own wives and children) that children died.
-
29
BREAKING NEWS | Highlights of 2023 Worldwide Service Year Report
by Drearyweather inbreaking news | highlights of 2023 worldwide service year report.
on november 15, 2023, the service committee of the governing body shared highlights of the 2023 worldwide service year report with the bethel family.
the following exciting increases were announced: baptisms: during the 2023 service year, 269,517 persons were baptized.
-
-
KalebOutWest
Yes, Slimboyfat, that report from the Vatican that I noted says the same thing you pointed out...
The Catholic Church is in rapid decline in Europe and North America
And more, such as there is a striking drop in priest-to-Catholic ratio and that there are fewer nuns than ever before.
The study contains much of the same data, and in fact the news article where the study is presented is meant to be alarming as it talks about the shortages the church is facing and the very problem caused by unbalanced growth and low religious vocations in that religion. Unlike the JWs, growth, the Vatican article explains, is nothing to cheer about if there is no way to properly care for it.
-
29
BREAKING NEWS | Highlights of 2023 Worldwide Service Year Report
by Drearyweather inbreaking news | highlights of 2023 worldwide service year report.
on november 15, 2023, the service committee of the governing body shared highlights of the 2023 worldwide service year report with the bethel family.
the following exciting increases were announced: baptisms: during the 2023 service year, 269,517 persons were baptized.
-
-
KalebOutWest
The report is really nothing.
Because of the size of the Catholic Church--which is staggering and in the billions--it takes two to three whole years to process the numbers and the report (imagine data that large that it takes a couple of years to collect and you have to settle for it always being two years behind because you are so big) before they can publish it.
Released this past October 22:
The report compared the numbers on the day of 31 December 2021 to the previous year on 31 December 2020.
There were 1.375 billion Catholics in the world, representing an overall increase of 16.24 million Catholics compared to the end of 2020.
You can download the report from this article on the Vatican News site if you want to read it in detail for yourself.
What Jehovah's Witnesses report are just dewdrops by comparison. Because they don't know any better they "oooo" and "aaah" when they hear these numbers, but it really is nothing.
The JWs have a worse child abuse scandal going on than the Catholic Church ever did and the news media barely blinks. This is why, because the JWs aren't even peanuts by comparison. Little tiny religions don't matter much to folks--itty bitty cults wherein the general public expect to find "child molesters" even less.
(And to be honest, almost every Catholic that I know is ignorant of their annual report. They couldn't tell you how many of themselves are in the world or know that their church publishes such a thing. That is telling you something--you're really big when you don't care about the numbers.)
-
543
Encouraging scriptures for the day
by Kosonen inhello my friends,.
here are some encouraging scriptures for the day:.
revelation 21:2 i also saw the holy city, new jerusalem, coming down out of heaven from god and prepared as a bride adorned for her husband.. hebrews 11:10 for he (abraham) was awaiting the city having real foundations, whose designer and builder is god.. revelation 21:24 and the nations will walk by means of its light, and the kings of the earth will bring their glory into it.. revelation 22:1 and he showed me a river of water of life, clear as crystal, flowing out from the throne of god and of the lamb 2 down the middle of its main street (of the holy city).
-
-
KalebOutWest
I think also that some of what the Watchtower taught us (and maybe a few liberties taken by Hollywood movies, like The Ten Commandments and The Prince of Egypt) warp our memories of the Exodus narrative. First of all, the story of "plagues" and the exodus itself is believed to be a liturgical drama and not history by both Judaism and Christianity.--See the footnotes, introductions, and additional materials in both Etz Hayim: Torah and Commentary, the official Bible of the Conservative Jewish movement and the NABRE, the official Bible of the Roman Catholic Church in the USA.
Second, in the Tenth Plague, "children" of the Egyptians are not killed by God, only firstborn "sons" die--and these are generally the eldest in each family (a significant point). The Book of Exodus opens with a pharoah of Egypt demanding the murder of infant "sons" of Israel, but allowing the girls to live. (Exodus 1:22) So in the final plague, God attacks Pharoah (who claims to be a god) by killing his "firstborn," or his next in line to rule, another "god," so to speak.
In Judaism, "firstborn son" means "heir" and refers to the eldest male who inherits the same rights as the father. For example, Jacob offer Esau a bowl of stew in order to get his right as firstborn, and later was helped by his mother to seal this with stealing his brother's blessing from his father. (Ge 25:29-34; ch 27) And it often means a royal heir, not literal child at all.--See Psalm 2:6,7.
This is what what was meant at the very beginning when God told Moses to warn Pharoah using these words:
You shall say to Pharaoh, ‘Thus says the Lord, Israel is my firstborn son, and I say to you, “Let my son go that he may serve me.” If you refuse to let him go, behold, I will kill your firstborn son.”--Exodus 4:22, 23, ESV.--Compare Ex. 19:6.
Thus, the drama unfolds with the Hebrew God striking Pharoah a blow to his heir, as promised via Moses at the first revelation at the Burning Bush. It was actually the first warning Pharoah ever got when Moses first visited him before even the first plague broke out--and thus foreshadowing how the story of the plagues end, with Pharoah losing his heir to the throne, not with literal children dying all over Egypt as you often see playing out in Hollywood movies or perhaps the way Jehovah's Witnesses mistakenly understand the text.
Finally, by definition "theodicy" is actually not a debate over why God would punish another with death if they deserved it. In the above drama, the pharaohs of Egypt are guilty of infanticide and thus God repays them by killing their firstborn, so to speak. (Again it's a liturgical drama, not a historical piece.) Why does theodicy not work here?
Because theodicy is not questioning why God brings justice upon the wicked, but why God allows evil if God can obviously do something in the first place. That is the opposite of what happens in the Ten Plague story: Pharoahs kill Hebrew sons, God kills Pharoah's sons. That is a story about God actively bringing justice for all to see.
Theodicy is questioning why doesn't God act at all, if there is a God. Why is there suffering? Why does evil exist? If God is good and omnipotent, then how can all this other stuff be? Why doesn't God act? Where is God? That is theodicy. For that, we have the Book of Job (which by the way, does not answer the question--it merely adds more questions and recognizes that humans cannot answer it).
-
63
Leaked. Nov 6th Secret Boxes
by Beth Sarim inself-aware npc has an upload that the ""top-secret"' elders only secret boxes is a drum roll here......a new brochure.....ta dahhhh🤪.
i mean how more dramatic can we get..
-
-
KalebOutWest
This is just an educated guess, but I think this is neither a "hailstone message" or "final message," but after watching everything from the Annual Meeting, I think this is an attempt to turn JW.org and the entire Watchtower religion and its theology into what has happened to the Mormons. Have you seen their website lately, especially after they rejected their name "Mormon" and now only call themselves "Christians" and emphasize "Christ"?
Notice HERE all the love, love, love...
With the Governing Body's information that there's no more dogmatic information on when the end is coming, and who is to be judged, etc., there is no "hailstone message" coming and no "final message" either. How could there be?
You also told people to stop reporting hours? Why? Some legal reason? Nah. I doubt it. I don't think there is a sinister reason behind any of this behind one simple factor.
The main reason behind all of this is that the Governing Body knows they can't tell anyone straight out that the end isn't coming and that 1914 is bogus, etc. There is no reason to be preaching about something that isn't "just around the corner." But they don't want to tell people to just straight out "okay, you can stop now." It is easier to just "pull the rug out" from under everyone, so to speak, and insert a new one while no one notices: a regular Protestant religion, like the Mormons--or the one the Mormons now have where they now claim it is all about Jesus and try to downplay the word "Mormon." (Their latest prophet was told by God that He doesn't want them to be called "Mormons" anymore, now after more than 100 years of using that name and millions spent on the latest "I'm a Mormon!" advetising campaign that the last prophet was told by God to invest in.)
This new brochure is designed to teach the Witnesses how to "love people" because Jehovah's Witnesses have been taught for over 100 years to hate people. Non-JWs, remember, are "Satan." Now they have to learn a new thing.
Of course it still remains to be seen exactly how this will play out. JWs smile, act nice, have nice manners in public, but are like little dogs on a leash while being walked by the Governing Body. As soon as the leash breaks, they go after worldly people and act mean and judgmental and attack and call them worldly and under the control of Satan.
Can they truly learn to "love," truly be a new religion that will no longer have a dogmatic message? According to what just happened with this "new light," they no longer have one anymore.
-
13
Confirmation that religion is dying.
by Phizzy inthis is from a site called "atheist republic" :.
" the phenomenon of "nones" — individuals who claim no religious affiliation — is rapidly reshaping america's religious landscape.
recent surveys by the associated press-norc center for public affairs research indicate that 30% of u.s. adults identify as nonreligious.
-
-
KalebOutWest
I think you are right in what you stated, Phizzy.
I was very familiar with the entire series from AP-NORC (and the one it was based on from Pew) as I had read and studied both as they were released. While neither actually talked about religion dying off from the American landscape itself (I can attest to that living here myself), I think you are correct as to organized religion.
The AP-NORC articles, however, discussed that this group was hard to define and not particularly one thing or another, and that was what I was pointing out--again, despite the fact that I can clearly see that many people just don't do the organized religion thing these days.
-
13
Confirmation that religion is dying.
by Phizzy inthis is from a site called "atheist republic" :.
" the phenomenon of "nones" — individuals who claim no religious affiliation — is rapidly reshaping america's religious landscape.
recent surveys by the associated press-norc center for public affairs research indicate that 30% of u.s. adults identify as nonreligious.
-
-
KalebOutWest
AP News ran a series on the "nones" in America. According to the series of articles:
“They are definitely not as turned off to religion as atheists and agnostics are...They practice their own type of spirituality, many of them.”
In fact, according to the data, only 7% of the "nones" described themeselves as "atheists" and 7% as "agnostics." The "nones" include a larger group of people who, according to AP:
"embrace a range of spiritual beliefs — from God, prayer and heaven to karma, reincarnation, astrology or energy in crystals"
These do tend to reject organized religion or feel they have been rejected by the same.
One might say that the "nones" are reshaping what religion in America means, not necessarily rejecting it outright.
The data above, however, is from the AP-NORC poll and is different from the Pew Research Center polls which also has collected data on "nones." The Pew Research Center specializes in religious data compared to AP-NORC and while they show very similar results, it is difficult to put a finger on exactly what the "nones" mean when they chose the label for themselves.
In some interviews I have read some people choose "none" merely because they refuse to be labeled, not because they have no belief or religion. So the data reflects this too, and this needs to be taken into account.