Does anyone here think she would have displayed the same indifference if the victum had been a woman?
My money is on the bet that she previously had serious issues with men, ....abused by, addicted to, and abused men previously.
fort worth a judge on friday raised bond to $250,000 for a nurse's aide charged with murder after a homeless man she hit died in her garage with his body lodged in her car's windshield.. chante j. mallard, 25, had been released on $10,000 bail after she was arrested wednesday.
but at a bond hearing friday, prosecutors said that amount was too low.. state district judge james r. wilson raised the amount and said ms. mallard must be under house arrest, wear an electronic monitor, continue counseling, avoid alcohol and undergo drug testing.
the judge also imposed a gag order in the case.. ms. mallard was charged with murder this week in the slaying of gregory glenn biggs, 37, a former fort worth school bus driver whose body was found dumped last october at cobb park on fort worth's south side.. "it truly is one of the most bizarre things i have ever seen," said fort worth police lt. david burgess, a supervisor in the traffic division.
Does anyone here think she would have displayed the same indifference if the victum had been a woman?
My money is on the bet that she previously had serious issues with men, ....abused by, addicted to, and abused men previously.
geez.
i sure hope you dont think i been hiding all day.
really, i havent.
refiners fire said:
[QUOTE]Abaddon.
Im finished with you bud.
Ive answered ya fifty times and you just keep putting up new posts asking why I dont answer the accusations Ive already answered....50 times.
Get lost.[QUOTE/]
ROFL
since every culture ever studied has been shown to possess religious practices aka.
spirituality, the axiom: "culture doesn't exist apart from religion" would seem to indicate that popular ideas concerning the non-religiosity of athiestic tenets are merely fictional.
i have always been amused by the propaganda the non-deists (and sometimes deists as well) use to spin their ideology.
Very long trip....stayed over an extra day. I'm exhausted.
Abaddon, In my original post which you took issue with to an unprecented degree and initialy chose a condecending approach to; my thesis was since there has never been a society with out a religion in the history of man, how different are current ideologies in terms of function, even though they choose to call it something else.
Even before you chose to present an argument you poisoned the well by attacking me for being biased and for Christians. What difference could that possibly make to my material ?
Honestly, I can't see where that charge has any merit since I never said I was promoting Christianity....only fairness.
On the other hand,you showed a clear bias by presenting your affinity for Humanism and using it to support position. This was thoroughly destroyed. Since Humanism is clearly religious even by its own admissions in its literature, you appeared very foolish and directly contricted yourself.
You have not put forth any evidence to show what the distinction is. It appears that you got rather upset and resorted to personal attacks and attempted to bog the conversation down in semantics as in the example below.
Look at this;"against all forms of unethical ideological influences"
Okay, maybe being obtuse is your thang, but ignoring your rather dense prose (as in heavy, not stupid, but ARE you realted to ANita Loomba?), I ask you; define 'unethical' (as in specific actions which would be unethical) without an underlying ideology. Go on. Don't bother. Can't be done. Cooking utensils exchanging comments on each other degree of carbonisation? The above quoted phrase is so close to meaningless as to pass as meaningless, unless adequately qualified, which it is not.If you don't know what ethics is, how can you claim an affinity to Secular Humanism since that is a major part of that philosophy? In any case; wouldn't a simple dictionary definition do?
Any way we could go on for days splitting definition hairs and chasing your red herrings or yoiu could simply present an argument instead of attacking me.
I'll ask you again to please not to denegrate yourself and this thread and
PLEASE POINT OUT TO US WHAT THE FUNCTIONAL DIFFERENCE IS BETWEEN POPULAR IDEOLOGIES AND HISTORICAL RELIGIONS.
In other words please point out the effect that an ideology has on a person/society and then tell us how those effects are essentially different from a religious one.
are ex-jws, flamers, agnostics and atheists more advanced spiritually and emotionally than fully-active jws?.
this is how m.scott-peck describes the 4 basic stages of spiritual development.
personally i can relate to stage 3 quite comfortably, but if i talk to a witness who may be a very devout and religious person i often feel as though this person is dragging me back into a lower stage, generally stage 2. what do you think?.
Excellent post Englishman! Seems like stage IV is the most comfortable.
I'm leaving for a business trip but will be available saturday morning. I too am looking forward to others responses.
since every culture ever studied has been shown to possess religious practices aka.
spirituality, the axiom: "culture doesn't exist apart from religion" would seem to indicate that popular ideas concerning the non-religiosity of athiestic tenets are merely fictional.
i have always been amused by the propaganda the non-deists (and sometimes deists as well) use to spin their ideology.
Abaddon,
I haven't had this much fun since obliging my sociology professor to retract certain statements as fact and admit they were opinion to the class.
After several days of silence, you have managed to make several more grave errors in your reasoning, continue to argue on points we are in agreement with; and thirdly, you finally get around to approaching something of substance in at least one instance.
I will take each catagory and deal with it as succintly as possible. It is the last catagory that I hope a meaningful discussion will emerge.
I am leaving for business in L.A. in a few hours and will return late Friday evening. I thank you for presenting your opinions and I look forward to discussing them Saturday morning.
is it still through his stomach like my mom taught me?
come on guys fess up....do you want a woman who can cook?
personally i love cooking...something about being in a hot kitchen...kneading bread...the way it feels under your hands...then sticking it in a hot oven and watching it rise...slathering butter all over it and eating it with your fingers...uuummm is there anything better?
Little Toe,
I remember that movie well and the effects it had on me as a younger man......(shivers):{o
Let's see, she could dance, she could weld, I bet she could drop a transmission in the afternoon and be ready in twenty minutes to dine on Medallions du Veau Forestiere topped off with Gateau Du Chocolat for dessert.
Was she the last of the good woman welders or what? ;-}
margaret singer is one of the favorite "experts" of those who like to paint with a wide "cult-accusing" brush.. anyone who speaks against singer is labeled a "cult-apologist".
if you don't know about margaret singer do a search on google.com using the following words margaret singer & apa .
apa is the main professional association of psychologists.. please be warned.
Quit taking this stuff so seriously.
Well, let me just say that it was evidently serious enough for you to make your outlandish statements.
I'll tell you why I believe that this is serious. Many people come here with very raw and sensitive emotions. They are flabergasted that they have been duped for years if not decades; then its compounded by the loss of family and a support system.
It is in this condition that they face more manipulation by people who esentially say, " if you don't believe anything you'll never be ripped off again, you'll be free". Then the thought evangelist contradicts himself goes on to espouse his views as if they are superior to others.
After having suffered much personal loss at the behest of the WBTS, it fills me with a sense of intellectual revulsion to observe unethical marketing of ideas, especially to those ill equipped to deal with it.
is it still through his stomach like my mom taught me?
come on guys fess up....do you want a woman who can cook?
personally i love cooking...something about being in a hot kitchen...kneading bread...the way it feels under your hands...then sticking it in a hot oven and watching it rise...slathering butter all over it and eating it with your fingers...uuummm is there anything better?
For some time now, I have been looking for a woman who wants to get into some quality mobilehome life and can do a little welding from time to time.
But damnit, every time a find a good woman welder, she's either got the wrong kind of tatoos and piercings or has teeth missing.
Hell, I'll even throw in a new pair of flip flops on christmas and knee pads on valentines day!
i have seen that statement quite a bit in the past few days.. why do people believe that's true?
chezza asks:
isnt an atheist someone who doesnt believe? how that be controlling?I dealt with this question in a thread I started here:
and again in gravedancers' thread here that he abandoned when it got too uncomfortable for him:
http://www.jehovahs-witness.com/forum/thread.asp?id=22539&site=3
Why gravedancer keeps running around the board starting new threads without facing challenges to his previous rhetoric, is truly causing me to question his motives.
The fact of the matter is that the athiest must believe in the supernatural on the question of origins.
However, even if some people concede that the position is merely lack of belief, the ideological structures built on athiesm can indeed be controlling and threaten your very freedom.
By advocating the maddeningly false reasoning that says: "because athiesm is innocous, its subsequent ideologies, social policies, and political implications are beyond the need for scrutiny and accountability", the aethistic evangelist hopes to disarm any resistence to his/her agenda.
It's just marketing....nothing more. It is amazing that this kind of childish reasoning is even attempted here, since many of us are very leary of and attuned to this kind of manipulation since having survived the WBTS.
Don't fall for the aethistic evangelist's false reasoniong. It is merely an attempt to avoid discussion of its usefulness and viability in people's live.
While I concede that athiesm is just as logically valid a position as theism, I have always wondered why it's promoters usually avoid provocative discussion of its effects on society and the individual.
It begs the question: What are they afraid of?
i have seen that statement quite a bit in the past few days.. why do people believe that's true?
Yawning more :-0
I'm waiting to see where you are going with this since you abandoned your previous thread that dealt with the exact same issue.
Never mind that you said you would reply to me there, but then did the opposite and simply started a new thread.
So, on the outside chance that an honest exchange will yield some form of actual cognition, I beg the question.....
Your point is?