Hi John,
You already stated that you are not familiar with the minimal facts argument. None of the 12 points above rely on the gospels. The world's top atheist / agnostic NT scholars allow for several other books of the NT to be genuine. Using these data... the resurrection happened.
These facts can be determined using critical scholars own allowances, which are extremely minimal......hence the term "Minimal Facts Argument."
The books that the critical scholars allow, together with their embedded creed statements, take us back to within a year or two of the Crucifixion.
Does this surprise you?
The questions these minimal facts generate are endless if the resurrection did not happen; making it more likely than not from an evidence standpoint.
The bottom line is: The evidence is overwhelming when compared to what we have for other historical figures and events. This lecture explains.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5znVUFHqO4Q