Since when do we know what God looks like?"
i didn't say that you knew
FragrantAddendum
JoinedPosts by FragrantAddendum
-
171
Alteration of Revelation 3:14 in the 4th century to support the emerging Trinity doctrine
by slimboyfat inin an earlier thread another poster asserted that there is no evidence that revelation 3:14 played a part in the 4th controversy that led to the trinity doctrine.
this was claimed as evidence that the description of jesus as “the beginning of the creation of god” in the verse was not understood to mean that jesus was god’s first creation.
the scholarly greek–english lexicon of the new testament & other early christian literature 3e (2001) by bauer, arndt, gingrich, and danker, in its latest edition states that “first creation” is indeed the probable meaning of the greek phrase.
-
-
FragrantAddendum
-
171
Alteration of Revelation 3:14 in the 4th century to support the emerging Trinity doctrine
by slimboyfat inin an earlier thread another poster asserted that there is no evidence that revelation 3:14 played a part in the 4th controversy that led to the trinity doctrine.
this was claimed as evidence that the description of jesus as “the beginning of the creation of god” in the verse was not understood to mean that jesus was god’s first creation.
the scholarly greek–english lexicon of the new testament & other early christian literature 3e (2001) by bauer, arndt, gingrich, and danker, in its latest edition states that “first creation” is indeed the probable meaning of the greek phrase.
-
-
FragrantAddendum
Could you provide a source for your claim that the catholic church hid fragments? (a reliable one)
-
171
Alteration of Revelation 3:14 in the 4th century to support the emerging Trinity doctrine
by slimboyfat inin an earlier thread another poster asserted that there is no evidence that revelation 3:14 played a part in the 4th controversy that led to the trinity doctrine.
this was claimed as evidence that the description of jesus as “the beginning of the creation of god” in the verse was not understood to mean that jesus was god’s first creation.
the scholarly greek–english lexicon of the new testament & other early christian literature 3e (2001) by bauer, arndt, gingrich, and danker, in its latest edition states that “first creation” is indeed the probable meaning of the greek phrase.
-
-
FragrantAddendum
we know this messenger is jesus because he looks so much like his father
with the rainbow
and jesus is the one who received the scroll in the beginning of the revelation
he was the only one who could open it
also revelation shows it is at jesus' command the execution of jehovah's judgments depicted in revelation are carried out
("and when he cried out, the voices of the seven thunders spoke")
-
33
Watchtower August leak: details from reddit user
by ukpimo infrom reddit.. a summary of changes: .
we are all sinners, so we have to be reasonable how we punish sinners.
if elders and congregation do not quickly help someone come to be reinstated they would be imitating satan the devil, not jehovah (yes that actually is what is said in the tagalog version in translation!
-
-
FragrantAddendum
the entire wt hierarchy are noxious weeds
remove the weeds, toxic problem solved
-
35
Hey, Regarding the "Resurrection" thing and the WT denial of the Mt 27:51-53 incident...
by FragrantAddendum inso according to bible.
elisha's bones were there when jehovah resurrected some other dude.
jesus could heal from a distance by power of god.
-
-
FragrantAddendum
that was an awesome grammar breakdown, @aqwsed, thank you🙂
so again to sum up...
the text is clear that
when jesus died
god did some signs to make it clear jesus was his son
one of the signs was a really big earthquake
one of the signs was the temple curtain ripping in two
one of the signs was a bunch of faithful jews being resurrected in a manner similar to that with the elisha's bones resurrection thing
the army officer attending jesus' execution and some others witnessed it
and said "truly this was god's son"
later after the sabbath those resurrected ones entered the city
and other people saw them too, for a witness
and matthew wrote about it
-
25
Who is this Guy?
by Slidin Fast inthe ra is underway and there is a common thread through the first day.
they have a "presenter" who comes across as an educated historian handling early bible fragments and translations as if he knows what he's doing.
the impression given is that he is an unassailable font of all knowledge, with his rich scottish accent he prints himself as across as professor gravitas.. i find this disturbing, we have no idea who he is or what if any his qualifications are to speak such with authority.
-
-
FragrantAddendum
haha, whenever i see the sign of the horns...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sign_of_the_horns#:~:text=
The%20sign%20of%20the%20horns,fingers%20down%20with%20the%20thumb.
🤘"
...it makes me think of this...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pHx7_Mr4ZYc
😆
-
171
Alteration of Revelation 3:14 in the 4th century to support the emerging Trinity doctrine
by slimboyfat inin an earlier thread another poster asserted that there is no evidence that revelation 3:14 played a part in the 4th controversy that led to the trinity doctrine.
this was claimed as evidence that the description of jesus as “the beginning of the creation of god” in the verse was not understood to mean that jesus was god’s first creation.
the scholarly greek–english lexicon of the new testament & other early christian literature 3e (2001) by bauer, arndt, gingrich, and danker, in its latest edition states that “first creation” is indeed the probable meaning of the greek phrase.
-
-
FragrantAddendum
i think it's hilarious
that anyone today would want to be associated
with the catholic church
considering they hid
those manuscripts all those years
talk about freakin hypocrites
all the religious institutions are a bunch of frauds
the ones who claim to be "god's channel" or "popus maximus" or some other type of benefactor
are the worst blasphemers of god's name
stupid pope wearing special robes like he's some kind of king
same with gb and their fake fds title
🤮🤮🤮
-
25
Who is this Guy?
by Slidin Fast inthe ra is underway and there is a common thread through the first day.
they have a "presenter" who comes across as an educated historian handling early bible fragments and translations as if he knows what he's doing.
the impression given is that he is an unassailable font of all knowledge, with his rich scottish accent he prints himself as across as professor gravitas.. i find this disturbing, we have no idea who he is or what if any his qualifications are to speak such with authority.
-
-
-
25
Who is this Guy?
by Slidin Fast inthe ra is underway and there is a common thread through the first day.
they have a "presenter" who comes across as an educated historian handling early bible fragments and translations as if he knows what he's doing.
the impression given is that he is an unassailable font of all knowledge, with his rich scottish accent he prints himself as across as professor gravitas.. i find this disturbing, we have no idea who he is or what if any his qualifications are to speak such with authority.
-
-
FragrantAddendum
monsters knocking on doors all over the world
-
51
2024-08-August-Edition-of-Watchtower!
by Atlantis init was translated so make sure everything looks ok.. 2024-08-august-edition of watchtower magazine.. .
https://smallpdf.com/result#r=c90d948913ed99d72872c0a1c609f388&t=share-document .
leopold.
-
-
FragrantAddendum
...and it goes back even further than rutherford...
...in russell's time...
...and in the time of the first century apostate so-called "apostolic fathers"...
for centuries gb-style apostates have twisted the scriptures in an antichrist way in order to establish "kingdoms" now that are in opposition to what christ taught
"one is your leader, the christ, whereas you are all brothers"
it's cool to see all those fake kingdoms now being dissolved