Posts by FragrantAddendum

35

Hey, Regarding the "Resurrection" thing and the WT denial of the Mt 27:51-53 incident...

by FragrantAddendum in

so according to bible.

elisha's bones were there when jehovah resurrected some other dude.

jesus could heal from a distance by power of god.

FragrantAddendum

paul was jewish

decades after jesus ascended to heaven

paul said the heavenly resurrection for other holy ones hadn't happened yet

there were many apostates promoting false stories

one false story was that people turn into spirits and go right to heaven when they die

the apostate so-called "apostolic fathers" taught such lies

like the dude who wrote "the shepherd of hermas"

what a freak!

also today, the watchtower follows in the footsteps of those first century apostates

when watchtower says "anointed ones started being resurrected to heaven at some point after 1914" they are lying

none of the "saints" have been resurrected yet

only jesus has gone from being a human to being a spirit creature in heaven

24

How A Prominent Watchtower Exposer Was Framed and Jailed

by Rig Boy in

8: the science of body manipulation & programming .

bloodlines of the illuminati by fritz springmeier .

Who is this Guy?

by Slidin Fast in

jw
friends

the ra is underway and there is a common thread through the first day.

they have a "presenter" who comes across as an educated historian handling early bible fragments and translations as if he knows what he's doing.

the impression given is that he is an unassailable font of all knowledge, with his rich scottish accent he prints himself as across as professor gravitas.. i find this disturbing, we have no idea who he is or what if any his qualifications are to speak such with authority.

FragrantAddendum

hey, speaking of andrew schofield...

here's another publication he's mentioned in:

https://www.outertemple.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Barry-Congregation-v-BXB-2021-4-W.L.R.-42.pdf

25

Who is this Guy?

by Slidin Fast in

jw
friends

the ra is underway and there is a common thread through the first day.

they have a "presenter" who comes across as an educated historian handling early bible fragments and translations as if he knows what he's doing.

the impression given is that he is an unassailable font of all knowledge, with his rich scottish accent he prints himself as across as professor gravitas.. i find this disturbing, we have no idea who he is or what if any his qualifications are to speak such with authority.

FragrantAddendum

how about this guy? lol...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PnrjzFvhFI4

"schofield" starts with the "sh-" sound

just like this word...💩

35

Hey, Regarding the "Resurrection" thing and the WT denial of the Mt 27:51-53 incident...

by FragrantAddendum in

so according to bible.

elisha's bones were there when jehovah resurrected some other dude.

jesus could heal from a distance by power of god.

FragrantAddendum

god wanted people to know that jesus was the one appointed by god to lead the people

the signs were undeniable

the resurrection of those faithful jews moved those who witnesses it

even a pagan roman officer had to acknowledge god's power

"truly this was god's son"

especially if they were not disciples of Jesus in some manner. Explain."

jesus didn't just heal people who were his followers

he raised the widow's son without knowing him

he raised jairus' daughter without knowing her

he didn't require people to be his followers for him to help them

god is not partial

and neither is his son

171

Alteration of Revelation 3:14 in the 4th century to support the emerging Trinity doctrine

by slimboyfat in

in an earlier thread another poster asserted that there is no evidence that revelation 3:14 played a part in the 4th controversy that led to the trinity doctrine.

this was claimed as evidence that the description of jesus as “the beginning of the creation of god” in the verse was not understood to mean that jesus was god’s first creation.

the scholarly greek–english lexicon of the new testament & other early christian literature 3e (2001) by bauer, arndt, gingrich, and danker, in its latest edition states that “first creation” is indeed the probable meaning of the greek phrase.

FragrantAddendum

Since when do we know what God looks like?"

i didn't say that you knew

171

Alteration of Revelation 3:14 in the 4th century to support the emerging Trinity doctrine

by slimboyfat in

in an earlier thread another poster asserted that there is no evidence that revelation 3:14 played a part in the 4th controversy that led to the trinity doctrine.

this was claimed as evidence that the description of jesus as “the beginning of the creation of god” in the verse was not understood to mean that jesus was god’s first creation.

the scholarly greek–english lexicon of the new testament & other early christian literature 3e (2001) by bauer, arndt, gingrich, and danker, in its latest edition states that “first creation” is indeed the probable meaning of the greek phrase.

FragrantAddendum

Could you provide a source for your claim that the catholic church hid fragments? (a reliable one)

https://www.codexsinaiticus.org/en/codex/history.aspx

171

Alteration of Revelation 3:14 in the 4th century to support the emerging Trinity doctrine

by slimboyfat in

in an earlier thread another poster asserted that there is no evidence that revelation 3:14 played a part in the 4th controversy that led to the trinity doctrine.

this was claimed as evidence that the description of jesus as “the beginning of the creation of god” in the verse was not understood to mean that jesus was god’s first creation.

the scholarly greek–english lexicon of the new testament & other early christian literature 3e (2001) by bauer, arndt, gingrich, and danker, in its latest edition states that “first creation” is indeed the probable meaning of the greek phrase.

FragrantAddendum

we know this messenger is jesus because he looks so much like his father

with the rainbow

and jesus is the one who received the scroll in the beginning of the revelation

he was the only one who could open it

also revelation shows it is at jesus' command the execution of jehovah's judgments depicted in revelation are carried out

("and when he cried out, the voices of the seven thunders spoke")

33

Watchtower August leak: details from reddit user

by ukpimo in

from reddit.. a summary of changes: .

we are all sinners, so we have to be reasonable how we punish sinners.

if elders and congregation do not quickly help someone come to be reinstated they would be imitating satan the devil, not jehovah (yes that actually is what is said in the tagalog version in translation!

FragrantAddendum

the entire wt hierarchy are noxious weeds

remove the weeds, toxic problem solved

35

Hey, Regarding the "Resurrection" thing and the WT denial of the Mt 27:51-53 incident...

by FragrantAddendum in

so according to bible.

elisha's bones were there when jehovah resurrected some other dude.

jesus could heal from a distance by power of god.

FragrantAddendum

that was an awesome grammar breakdown, @aqwsed, thank you🙂

so again to sum up...

the text is clear that

when jesus died

god did some signs to make it clear jesus was his son

one of the signs was a really big earthquake

one of the signs was the temple curtain ripping in two

one of the signs was a bunch of faithful jews being resurrected in a manner similar to that with the elisha's bones resurrection thing

the army officer attending jesus' execution and some others witnessed it

and said "truly this was god's son"

later after the sabbath those resurrected ones entered the city

and other people saw them too, for a witness

and matthew wrote about it