FragrantAddendum

Joined

• started 12 topics
• posted 385 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by FragrantAddendum

• 
  25

  Who is this Guy?

  by Slidin Fast in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  the ra is underway and there is a common thread through the first day.

  they have a "presenter" who comes across as an educated historian handling early bible fragments and translations as if he knows what he's doing.

  the impression given is that he is an unassailable font of all knowledge, with his rich scottish accent he prints himself as across as professor gravitas.. i find this disturbing, we have no idea who he is or what if any his qualifications are to speak such with authority.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  FragrantAddendum

  hey, speaking of andrew schofield...

  here's another publication he's mentioned in:

  https://www.outertemple.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Barry-Congregation-v-BXB-2021-4-W.L.R.-42.pdf

  
  
• 
  25

  Who is this Guy?

  by Slidin Fast in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  the ra is underway and there is a common thread through the first day.

  they have a "presenter" who comes across as an educated historian handling early bible fragments and translations as if he knows what he's doing.

  the impression given is that he is an unassailable font of all knowledge, with his rich scottish accent he prints himself as across as professor gravitas.. i find this disturbing, we have no idea who he is or what if any his qualifications are to speak such with authority.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  FragrantAddendum

  how about this guy? lol...

  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PnrjzFvhFI4

  "schofield" starts with the "sh-" sound

  just like this word...💩
  
  
• 
  35

  Hey, Regarding the "Resurrection" thing and the WT denial of the Mt 27:51-53 incident...

  by FragrantAddendum in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  so according to bible.

  elisha's bones were there when jehovah resurrected some other dude.

  jesus could heal from a distance by power of god.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  FragrantAddendum

  god wanted people to know that jesus was the one appointed by god to lead the people

  the signs were undeniable

  the resurrection of those faithful jews moved those who witnesses it

  even a pagan roman officer had to acknowledge god's power

  "truly this was god's son"

  especially if they were not disciples of Jesus in some manner. Explain."
  

  jesus didn't just heal people who were his followers

  he raised the widow's son without knowing him

  he raised jairus' daughter without knowing her

  he didn't require people to be his followers for him to help them

  god is not partial

  and neither is his son
• 
  171

  Alteration of Revelation 3:14 in the 4th century to support the emerging Trinity doctrine

  by slimboyfat in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  in an earlier thread another poster asserted that there is no evidence that revelation 3:14 played a part in the 4th controversy that led to the trinity doctrine.

  this was claimed as evidence that the description of jesus as “the beginning of the creation of god” in the verse was not understood to mean that jesus was god’s first creation.

  the scholarly greek–english lexicon of the new testament & other early christian literature 3e (2001) by bauer, arndt, gingrich, and danker, in its latest edition states that “first creation” is indeed the probable meaning of the greek phrase.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  FragrantAddendum

  Since when do we know what God looks like?"

  i didn't say that you knew
• 
  171

  Alteration of Revelation 3:14 in the 4th century to support the emerging Trinity doctrine

  by slimboyfat in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  in an earlier thread another poster asserted that there is no evidence that revelation 3:14 played a part in the 4th controversy that led to the trinity doctrine.

  this was claimed as evidence that the description of jesus as “the beginning of the creation of god” in the verse was not understood to mean that jesus was god’s first creation.

  the scholarly greek–english lexicon of the new testament & other early christian literature 3e (2001) by bauer, arndt, gingrich, and danker, in its latest edition states that “first creation” is indeed the probable meaning of the greek phrase.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  FragrantAddendum

  Could you provide a source for your claim that the catholic church hid fragments? (a reliable one)
  

  https://www.codexsinaiticus.org/en/codex/history.aspx
  
• 
  171

  Alteration of Revelation 3:14 in the 4th century to support the emerging Trinity doctrine

  by slimboyfat in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  in an earlier thread another poster asserted that there is no evidence that revelation 3:14 played a part in the 4th controversy that led to the trinity doctrine.

  this was claimed as evidence that the description of jesus as “the beginning of the creation of god” in the verse was not understood to mean that jesus was god’s first creation.

  the scholarly greek–english lexicon of the new testament & other early christian literature 3e (2001) by bauer, arndt, gingrich, and danker, in its latest edition states that “first creation” is indeed the probable meaning of the greek phrase.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  FragrantAddendum

  

  we know this messenger is jesus because he looks so much like his father

  with the rainbow

  and jesus is the one who received the scroll in the beginning of the revelation

  he was the only one who could open it

  also revelation shows it is at jesus' command the execution of jehovah's judgments depicted in revelation are carried out

  ("and when he cried out, the voices of the seven thunders spoke")
• 
  33

  Watchtower August leak: details from reddit user

  by ukpimo in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  from reddit.. a summary of changes: .

  we are all sinners, so we have to be reasonable how we punish sinners.

  if elders and congregation do not quickly help someone come to be reinstated they would be imitating satan the devil, not jehovah (yes that actually is what is said in the tagalog version in translation!

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  FragrantAddendum

  the entire wt hierarchy are noxious weeds

  remove the weeds, toxic problem solved

  
  
• 
  35

  Hey, Regarding the "Resurrection" thing and the WT denial of the Mt 27:51-53 incident...

  by FragrantAddendum in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  so according to bible.

  elisha's bones were there when jehovah resurrected some other dude.

  jesus could heal from a distance by power of god.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  FragrantAddendum

  that was an awesome grammar breakdown, @aqwsed, thank you🙂

  so again to sum up...

  the text is clear that

  when jesus died

  god did some signs to make it clear jesus was his son

  one of the signs was a really big earthquake

  one of the signs was the temple curtain ripping in two

  one of the signs was a bunch of faithful jews being resurrected in a manner similar to that with the elisha's bones resurrection thing

  the army officer attending jesus' execution and some others witnessed it

  and said "truly this was god's son"

  later after the sabbath those resurrected ones entered the city

  and other people saw them too, for a witness

  and matthew wrote about it
• 
  25

  Who is this Guy?

  by Slidin Fast in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  the ra is underway and there is a common thread through the first day.

  they have a "presenter" who comes across as an educated historian handling early bible fragments and translations as if he knows what he's doing.

  the impression given is that he is an unassailable font of all knowledge, with his rich scottish accent he prints himself as across as professor gravitas.. i find this disturbing, we have no idea who he is or what if any his qualifications are to speak such with authority.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  FragrantAddendum

  haha, whenever i see the sign of the horns...

  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sign_of_the_horns#:~:text=

  The%20sign%20of%20the%20horns,fingers%20down%20with%20the%20thumb.
  

  🤘"
  

  ...it makes me think of this...

  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pHx7_Mr4ZYc

  😆
  
  
• 
  171

  Alteration of Revelation 3:14 in the 4th century to support the emerging Trinity doctrine

  by slimboyfat in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  in an earlier thread another poster asserted that there is no evidence that revelation 3:14 played a part in the 4th controversy that led to the trinity doctrine.

  this was claimed as evidence that the description of jesus as “the beginning of the creation of god” in the verse was not understood to mean that jesus was god’s first creation.

  the scholarly greek–english lexicon of the new testament & other early christian literature 3e (2001) by bauer, arndt, gingrich, and danker, in its latest edition states that “first creation” is indeed the probable meaning of the greek phrase.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  FragrantAddendum

  i think it's hilarious

  that anyone today would want to be associated

  with the catholic church

  considering they hid

  those manuscripts all those years

  talk about freakin hypocrites

  all the religious institutions are a bunch of frauds

  the ones who claim to be "god's channel" or "popus maximus" or some other type of benefactor

  are the worst blasphemers of god's name

  stupid pope wearing special robes like he's some kind of king

  same with gb and their fake fds title

  🤮🤮🤮