I remember conversations like this when I was a child. All the aprehension about some new tactic the police were using and how this would result in us losing all of our rights and all.
The constitution was being destroyed. The police would crash into the houses of innocent people and all.
This was 55 / 60 yrs ago. It never happened.
As technology grows the criminals will use this to continue their illegal acts.
The police will have to step up their technology to keep up. The use of a dog to sniff the air around a car, where a driver is unusually nervous or showing signs of fear is hardly an act of invasion of privacy.
If so we would have to stop all the police from giving a sobriety test to a driver, because the cop smelled liquor on the drivers breath or maybe he slured his speach.
This line of thought remindes me of the jw's always preaching the world is going to hell and we will all die.
This court decision does not change the 4th amendment it still stands and can be used as a defence in court.
If we are not doing illegal acts, what do we have to fear is a legitimate question.
Outoftheorg