when I was in, I openly spoke out against the jabs. No, I wasn't popular! and was threatened with an invite to the backroom! The GB will likely say they were following CDC ( which they were ) but they claimed direction from God Almighty! They will likely claim it was everyone's personal decision, which it was/is, but the people were made to feel like they were being disobedient to and unfaithful to Jehovah if they didn't take them and also to feel like they didn't love the brotherhood. Do you not feel some sort of obligation to speak up? At least to tell others not to take the boosters! I am on the outside now and I am mortified that they are still pushing for the vax for the elder, MS, and pioneer schools! The house if on fire...people need to get out!
enoughisenough
JoinedPosts by enoughisenough
-
14
When is the time to say the GB were wrong about the jabs?
by Indoubtbigtime init’s now becoming obvious more and more by the day that everyone was wrong about these vaccines being a good thing to take.. when will rank and file realise the governing body were so wrong to push them so hard saying jehovah helped get 99% of special full time servants fully vaccinated?.
its something we are all afraid to talk about.
we can’t say the words the governing body were wrong????????.
-
-
20
mentally ill/delusional or con artist?
by enoughisenough inmaybe this has been discussed in the past and i wasn't here... what do you think?
are the gb members knowingly pulling a con, or do they have delusions of grandeur?
i will go out on a limb here to say that i think they are con artist.
-
enoughisenough
maybe this has been discussed in the past and I wasn't here... What do you think? Are the GB members knowingly pulling a con, or do they have delusions of grandeur? I will go out on a limb here to say that I think they are con artist. Why? Because protecting the organization is the most important thing. To do that they have to come up with a control tactic, and what better way than to claim to be spokesmen for God himself. They have to know that some of the things they promote are against what is written in the Bible, and yet you aren't allowed to point that out or you are kicked out.
-
11
JW's: When EXACTLY did Jesus become king?
by BoogerMan ini thought it was in 1914. silly me!.
w78 3/1 p. 18 par.
15 - when was god’s son made a king-priest like melchizedek?
-
enoughisenough
I remember explaining to someone Satan was ousted from heaven in 1914 ( therefore that is when Jesus began his kingdom in the fall of 1914. ( Along about Oct if I recall old WT articles correctly) WW! starting was the shown proof of that-the world being engulfed in war after Satan was thrown out. This was being gullible, because it wasn't until within this past year that I put together WW1 started in July and therefore didn't fit the narrative of Jesus beginning to rule in the Fall of 1914.
-
-
enoughisenough
the prices were so crazy at the supermarket today-I went bananas!
-
-
enoughisenough
I'm game! I went into a supermarket yesterday and asked the butcher for some sausage . He said, " Sorry, we won't have any until "groundhog day".
-
10
OPINIONS PLEASE: I propose a new strategy against the Watchtower policy of DISFELLOWSHIP
by Terry ini need your opinion and a discussion...tell me what you think, both pros and cons...the governments of norway and russia have both targeted watchtower's severely inhumane policy of disfellowship separating and isolating members by ostracizing them and labeling them as 'mentally diseased", etc.
dis fellowship.is a mushy concept unfamiliar to non-jw's.that word doesn't convey brutal, cold, and uncaring shunning and the impact on vulnerable persons cut off from family and friends.i propose swapping the phrase "religious apartheid" for the term "disfellowship" because it is significantly more impactful, familiar, and gut-wrenching.jw's teach practice and promote discrimination, opprobrium, and animus in punishing by isolation those who disagree with their doctrines.
moreover - it is a de facto death sentence both spiritually and (according to the expectation of armageddon) literally as well.
-
enoughisenough
I have to say I never followed "apartheid" a lot to have a full understanding of it. So I guess it boils down to the audience one hopes to have. I do understand hate and hate speech. I watched a GB member spouting off ( and twisting a scripture ) liking apostates to enemies of God...which is a slanderous statement about most who have left the org.
-
22
Jehovah's Witnesses: Zoom Cancelled Love Jehovah Go Back to In Person Meetings
by HiddlesWife inthis is a new video posted by the exjw critical thinkers jt & lady cee:.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tvmulzbczvm&t=1s.
i had a hunch that wt was going to do so, but this is happening quite soon.
-
enoughisenough
towards the last, I would tune in zoom, turn off sound and go about the house with what ever I wanted, and then I would come in for a minute and do a hands up, and then quit again. ( just to fool the others into thinking I was on the meeting.) and I would come back at the end sometimes. The break out chat rooms were a joke...there would always be someone on there who took over .
-
10
OPINIONS PLEASE: I propose a new strategy against the Watchtower policy of DISFELLOWSHIP
by Terry ini need your opinion and a discussion...tell me what you think, both pros and cons...the governments of norway and russia have both targeted watchtower's severely inhumane policy of disfellowship separating and isolating members by ostracizing them and labeling them as 'mentally diseased", etc.
dis fellowship.is a mushy concept unfamiliar to non-jw's.that word doesn't convey brutal, cold, and uncaring shunning and the impact on vulnerable persons cut off from family and friends.i propose swapping the phrase "religious apartheid" for the term "disfellowship" because it is significantly more impactful, familiar, and gut-wrenching.jw's teach practice and promote discrimination, opprobrium, and animus in punishing by isolation those who disagree with their doctrines.
moreover - it is a de facto death sentence both spiritually and (according to the expectation of armageddon) literally as well.
-
enoughisenough
As a single word, why not? ...if I want to describe to others what I am now considered, I tell them JWs consider me a "filthy apostate deserving of death". I think I need to change that description to " filthy, mentally diseased, lying God hating apostate deserving of death" because that is what the JW org teaches about those who leave the org. ( they literally teach their members to hate!-we hate God, so God hates us, so it is ok for them to hate us--something like that.)
-
4
feeling nothing in common
by enoughisenough ini feel like there may be some old jw friends that i could call- they may not know i left jw- but somehow i am not inclined to.
i would have to play a game with them...i feel like i have nothing in common with them anymore.
i feel like if i did talk to them, i would want to tell them they have been duped and that will go over like a wet balloon.
-
enoughisenough
I feel like there may be some old JW friends that I could call- they may not know I left JW- but somehow I am not inclined to. I would have to play a game with them...I feel like I have nothing in common with them anymore. I feel like if I did talk to them, I would want to tell them they have been duped and that will go over like a wet balloon.
-
282
How Will They End 1914 Teaching?
by EmptyInside ini'm sure this has been discussed, but 1914 has to go away.
instead of, the overlapping generation teaching, they should have just ditched 1914. .
they should have done that a long time ago with 1975. it's the last of the teachings in the charles taze russell era.. i'm thinking they just will stop talking about it, and it will be out of the mind of the rank and file loyal witnesses .
-
enoughisenough
" And how does mistaken interpretations of the Bible by JW falsify the Bible or disqualify JW as God’s agency?" Mistaken interpretations don't disqualify the Bible, but if JW is really God's agency, there would not have been all of these false prophesies that you are calling interpretations.