Bad wolf: Have yet to see one on a person who is born in, who then has their parents and or children shun them, and not because they CHOOSE TO, but because the WT tells them they can't even text, email, or social media, because if they do, then jesus will hate them and kill them in armageddon.
Badwolf, I think this case matches what you need. Correct me as I have not read all documents of case:
Janice PAUL, a/k/a/ Janice Perez, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.WATCHTOWER BIBLE AND TRACT SOCIETY OF NEW YORK, INC.,Defendants-Appellee.
https://openjurist.org/819/f2d/875
This was a case where in June 1987, the United States Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit upheld the Witnesses' right to shun those who fail to live by the group's standards and doctrines, upholding the ruling of a lower court.
Janice Paul was raised as a JW and she disassociated when she was 24.
Upset by her shunning by her former friends and co-religionists, Paul, a resident of Alaska, brought suit in Washington State Superior Court alleging common law torts of defamation, invasion of privacy, fraud, and outrageous conduct. She claims in essence that the practice of shunning invades interests that the state does or should protect through its tort law.
Following was the courts judgment:
The members of the Church Paul decided to abandon have concluded that they no longer want to associate with her. We hold that they are free to make that choice. The Jehovah's Witnesses' practice of shunning is protected under the first amendment of the United States Constitution and therefore under the provisions of the Washington state constitution.