Dear Blondie,
Thank you for responding, and referencing the 1956 and 1989 Watchtower articles. It is appreciated. I see that by '89 the part about 'in association with the spirit directed organization" had been added. I will continue to research as I'm sure I've seen somewhere online a timeline of how the day of baptism questions changed over the years.
I never believed I was baptized into any 'Organization'. In fact from the very beginning the overuse of that word by some Witnesses grated on me. It seemed 'worldly' and opposed to what I was being taught, as the world we were supposed to be no part of, was filled with organizations.
The United Natiions Organization was said to be "a counterfeit of God's Kingdom", and " The Disgusting Thing that causes Desolation, prophesied by Daniel". The World Health Organization, and North Atlantic Treaty Organization were man-made attempts to solve problems that left God out of the picture and could not succeed. Also, in my background "The Organization" also referred to The Mafia!
The only way I could accept it at all was to re-define it in my own mind. That 'Jehovah's Organization' was His Arrangement of things on Heaven and Earth, but solely His, in his physical creation, and spiritually. It had nothing to do with any group or corporation of humans. Perhaps that was the original intent of the term.
I can understand how an adult, baptized in one religious group by conscious choice, upon deciding to change affiliations, might need to be baptized again in their new faith group, but since Watchtower teaching is that infant baptism is unscriptural and invalid, and an infant has no choice or understanding of the matter, I still cannot see why a letter of disassociation to the church where it was done is necessary.
Maybe this is no longer required, and in any event in my case is water that long ago went under the bridge. I'm just trying to sort out some thoughts that have long been in the back of my mind.