A bit. When Trump turns out fine, it will send a message that a person in the supposed danger age can get it and it is not that big a deal. Furthermore, it will make Trump look strong. Not a good day for Biden...
minsky
JoinedPosts by minsky
-
22
Does Trump Testing Positive Change Anything???
by minimus inhe has been wearing a mask.
his top assistant got it and it appears spread it.
so???
-
-
-
57
Anthony Morris wants former Jehovah's Witnesses DEAD
by neat blue dog inin a disgusting new video, anthony morris iii talks about apostates, and brings to mind his 'hot dog' talk all over again as he anticipates the demise of ex-jehovah's witnesses.
i don't know if you're familiar with maggots, but when you see a whole bunch of them it's not a pleasant sight.. .
what a fitting picture of the final end of all of god's enemies.
-
-
minsky
It is a poor sign from an institutional standpoint that they don't have a mechanism to stop this. I mean, if this was their BEST take... -
-
-
minsky
As long as there are liberals goodwins law will hold true.
Do you have an opinion about the substance of the debate?
-
-
-
minsky
I disagree with those who feel the debate did not have substance.
For instance, I am excited to learn Trump has a plan to lower drug prices by 80-90 percent, and make insulin as cheap as water. This may sound unrealistic but it isn't. Most drugs are in fact very cheap to manufacture and the price is kept artificially high. This is the true purpose of Medicaid, ACA, etc. European countries are not that different, it is just called something else.
A nurse and a bed is not that expensive in an open economy. Medicine (currently) is. If all public healthcare was stripped away and drug prizes was lowered as Trump suggests, the result would be the cheapest and best healthcare system imaginable. All that is possible in the next 4 years with the new court, which is why democrats are scared.
-
-
-
minsky
I agree with Anony Mous. Biden was confused and constantly needed to be rescued. He came across as very weak, as a shell of a man. Trump was strong, forceful and in command of facts. When Biden was cornered, he resorted to ad-hominem attacks and a few pre-planned lines, which I suspect was written on his papers.
-
-
-
minsky
The plot thickens: https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/09/29/joe-biden-reverses-course-declines-to-have-ears-inspected-pre-debate-despite-agreeing-days-ago/
Why would someone agree to have their ears inspected, then decline? What innocent explanation is there?
It would literally take like 5 seconds.
#eargate
-
-
-
minsky
Minimus: I could easily see the earpiece idea as being true. Why not? We know the mans brain is fried, so what other play is there? TBH, I wonder if he slips up in a major way, like wanders off or mix up and perhaps just repeats the question.
-
-
-
minsky
Over/under that Biden is wearing an earpiece with the answers?
-
43
Remind re: The "Cult" Label
by Simon inif you accuse people of being stuck in jw mindset or "cult-like" mentality simply because someone has a different view of politics than you, you'll be deleted.. it's insulting and a lazy substitute for having any real argument for a proper debate.. what next ... "you smell" ?.
-
-
minsky
You are actually doing democrats a huge service by not rewarding this behavior. I truly think they are blind to how biased they come across to normies sometimes.
-
20
You know you're really dim-witted when? (You actually think a defeated President can successfully REFUSE to step down)
by Terry inwhen you're easily convinced about a total impossibility.. such as what?.
such as a defeated president actually being able to refuse.
to step down from office.
-
-
minsky
Let's hope the elections are free and fair, and give a clear, uncontested, result.
If that does not happen, the only option is to take it to the court. At that point the court may side with Biden, or it may side with Trump. The courts opinion will be definition be the legal ruling on the election, and so decide the legal winner. There is just no other option.
In the spirit of compromise, anyone who is interested in a functional democracy must abide by it, just as with Bush v. Gore. This is why it is important to have a full court, to avoid the chaos a split court would result in, and why a contested result must be resolved by the court.