holy nativity batman!
on jw broadcasting.
final song for this year's convention.
My contribution in song:
Let us gather to celebrate, upon this wint'ry morn,
The holy blessed day, Judge Rutherford was born,
The sheep were disobedient, God didn't hold a grudge,
Instead of Armageddon, Jehovah sent da Judge.
He winnowed out the chaff and sent them door to door,
He changed their name to publishers, from now 'til evermore,
God's work is now more business-like, professional and choice,
Jehovah took da Judge away, the sheep did much rejoice.
holy nativity batman!
on jw broadcasting.
final song for this year's convention.
"Is this a move towards mainstreaming?"
Possibly. If they start allowing JWs to attend Carols in the Domain, possibly have a choir of their own present their new Christmas song to the world, I'll be somewhat impressed. But seriously, doing something like that might gain them serious cachet in the broader community.
holy nativity batman!
on jw broadcasting.
final song for this year's convention.
Larry Norman had a song entitled "Why Should The Devil Have All The Good Music". The WT probably wrote off "Christendom's" music as the Devil's music, but they've been trending lately to more Hillsong style choruses, I believe*.
I wonder what's driving the trend? WT music has been described as dirge-like, historically, but so what? The WT always had tight control over the sheep; it wasn't like they were allowed to go to other churches where the more upbeat songs made the WT versions sound like crap. So why bother with the change? If it's dull, but all you've ever known, you're hardly going to be champing at the bit for something else.
*From comments posted on this board
holy nativity batman!
on jw broadcasting.
final song for this year's convention.
"Glory in the heights above" doesn't have the same ring to it that "Gloria in excelsis Deo" does, but at least they're trying. 🙄
i’ve noticed a pattern where things don’t go the way i expect them to go and/or whenever i realise there is a trend and, i mentally adjust for the idea that the trend will continue, the trend stops in its tracks.
so on that basis, and given many people, including myself, and active jws, have been asking ‘what changes will the governing body make next?’ perhaps the (disappointing) answer is: ‘nothing much for a while to come’.
maybe they’ve made the changes they want for now, and will wait a while and see how it’s received.
Especially Treasury B'lites - they were not the brightest Bethel had to offer, but by god they were loyal.
Loyal versus capable: interesting trade-off. 😳
i stumbled, via a google search, upon a part of jw space that is usually heavily defended against outsiders like my good self.
in a discussion, someone started their post with "i (started doing x)... when the slave began to suggest doing so"*.
do pimis really talk that way?
I stumbled, via a Google search, upon a part of JW space that is usually heavily defended against outsiders like my good self. In a discussion, someone started their post with "I (started doing X)... when the Slave began to suggest doing so"*
Do PIMIs really talk that way? I assume that the person is referring to the GB/Bethel, when they say "the Slave". I realise that the GB use the term to describe themselves, kind of like the Royal third person, but I didn't think that the R&F would copy them and use it in general conversation.
*I'm being deliberately vague about the source
i thought of something during last weekend's wt study article, that made me think that perhaps we are on the wrong track on how the governing body is going to handle the whole 607-1914 thing.in paragraph 9 it referred to the the messianic kingdom rule as a period as called 'times of restoration of all things' taken from acts 3:21. this period of 'restoration', started in 1914 with jesus becoming king in heaven, and led to pure worship being restored 'soon after that'.and it was the last comment, that got me going.you see, in previous wt study articles (and i went through the 1990-2024 references) this term of 'times of restoration' was applied rather generally and more like a description of what jesus and jehovah was going to do during the messianic rule, rather than a formal title and a fulfillment of prophesy.however, what if the governing body keeps 1914 as jesus' invisible crowning ... but dumps 1918 as the date for the beginning of true worship?
firstly this paragraph reinforces the previously announced removal of russell being a part of the slave class, for obvious reasons.
but if 'true worship' had a soft start around the 1920s and making that the elastic part, then the embarrassment of his teachings and maybe even rutherford's, all of it could be excused as the speech of john the baptist.
nowwhat?, probably not. The recent raft of changes got a lot of people excited and speculating about possible future changes. Dropping 1914 is one of those things on a "Things I'd Like To See" wishlist
It'd probably make sense to do so, but very hard to do in reality.
That being said, although I'm sceptical about some of the suggested changes, I'll always be pleasantly surprised about any that do happen.
as your family considers its disaster preparedness plan, please ensure that the secretary has up-to-date contact information for you and your emergency contact.
also, we have re- peatedly seen good results when brothers and sisters are prepared with go bags and are ready to obey direction when they face various kinds of disasters.
please be sure you have a go bag, and review its contents at least once a year.
Blondie, are you implying that the main reason they are now suggesting that disaster preparation is a good idea is because they lost some paperwork? 🤔😱
I find their suggestion of having a go bag (I guess "bug-out bag" is too crude for their liking?) ready interesting. A normal person told to get a bug-out bag ready would probably watch a few YouTube videos on how to assemble one. But being so much about information control as the WT is, I can't see them encouraging the sheep to go off the plantation and watch any old video, especially not from the "Christian" preppers.
So, do they have their own guide(s) on how to make a bug-out bag? Do they have videos on disaster preparation on their website?
A further thought raises its head: everyone from Walmart to high-end survival/camping suppliers sell ready made bug-out bags, from a few dollars, into the thousands. Are there any entrepreneurial JWs providing third party bug-out bags to fellow JWs? The WT carts/trolleys are made by an approved third party provider, and AFAIK, there are all sorts of JW friendly items like bible covers and book bags sold online to JWs. So is there a WT approved provider of "Go Bags" out there*?
*I thought I'd ask the question before I went searching for the answer. I'd be interested to know, if such provider exists, if anyone here already knew about them.
for the uninitiated, budgie smugglers are a tight pair of men's swimming briefs that leave very little to the imagination.
for some reason favoured by old men on australian beaches... .
in case the writing is too small, here's the transcript:.
For the uninitiated, Budgie Smugglers are a tight pair of men's swimming briefs that leave very little to the imagination. For some reason favoured by old men on Australian beaches...
In case the writing is too small, here's the transcript:
"Outside the Kingom Hall"
Elder 1: The sisters seem to be enjoying the new light on standards of dress!
Elder 2: Wait'll you see the pair of Budgie Smugglers I've got on order when I wear them next week!
Elder 1: ...
seems to me wt lawyers and witnesses cannot be trusted even under oath.. mara mitchell writes.
as far as their family members are concerned, normal family relations continue with the exception of spiritual fellowship.”.
attached is a video on how watchtower presents family members being treated by their family when defending themselves in court.. .
"If this was true, it's very likely the ex JW that brought the case to court would have felt any need to."
Excellent point.
