Prediction: no more changes for a long while

by slimboyfat 86 Replies latest watchtower beliefs

  • slimboyfat
    slimboyfat

    I’ve noticed a pattern where things don’t go the way I expect them to go and/or whenever I realise there is a trend and, I mentally adjust for the idea that the trend will continue, the trend stops in its tracks.

    So on that basis, and given many people, including myself, and active JWs, have been asking ‘what changes will the Governing Body make next?’ Perhaps the (disappointing) answer is: ‘nothing much for a while to come’. Maybe they’ve made the changes they want for now, and will wait a while and see how it’s received. Unless there’s a majority on the Governing Body eager to dump 1914, then now might be a good time to do that. Otherwise is there anything big on the to do list? I can’t think.

    I am a bit disappointed with the shunning change because it goes nowhere near far enough. In a way it has unhelpfully underlined that you’re not supposed to have meals / holidays / social events with DFed people. Because, for people with DFed relatives, being able to say hello at the meeting doesn’t cut it. You want to sit down, have something to eat, or go on a trip together. I reckon many JWs were already doing those things with DFed people, just avoiding doing it conspicuously or at the Kingdom Hall. So the new rules are much harsher than what they were doing up to now and restating them in this way only serves to underline that you’re not supposed to socialise.

  • Sea Breeze
    Sea Breeze

    The message is : we will throw you a bone now and then as long as you don't try to explore Christianity outside of the Kingdom Hall.

    Families are still weaponized against accepting the new covenant "for the forgiveness of sins" (Mt. 26: 27-28)

    Damn those apostates!

  • TonusOH
    TonusOH

    I wonder if they will end up with a situation like they have with the blood policy, only with DF instead. Where they keep making changes in response to pressure, slowly chipping away at it but never really reaching a conclusion. Then they are stuck with a policy that is mostly useless but can still do a lot of harm in the wrong circumstances.

    I guess that is one way to know that the policy was wrong in the first place. That no matter how much you "adjust" it, it continues to be a bad idea until/unless you get rid of it completely.

  • dropoffyourkeylee
    dropoffyourkeylee

    I'm still looking for an expanding role for women. It's long overdue.

  • NotFormer
    NotFormer

    The modus operandi to date seems to be: announce the big change, but hide it behind a little one, like beards or women's trousers. A big one like 1914 or dropping the blood doctrine entirely would have to be hidden behind something superficial, but important to the R&F, if the pattern holds up. Are there any more important frivolities that they can address?

    Edited to add: would expanding roles for women be a frivolity or a major change?

  • Vidiot
    Vidiot
    NotFormer - “…The modus operandi to date seems to be: announce the big change, but hide it behind a little one, like beards or women's trousers…”

    I noticed that, too.

  • Elmer
    Elmer

    What “big change” has ACTUALLY taken place?

  • Vidiot
    Vidiot
    Sea Breeze - The message is: we will throw you a bone now and then as long as you don't try to explore Christianity outside of the Kingdom Hall…”

    Anything outside of the Kingdom Hall, really…

    …‘cause at this point, damn near everything outside the Kingdom Hall is looking like a major improvement.

  • Listener
    Listener

    NotFormer - Are there any more important frivolities that they can address?

    How about this one - They announce big changes to 1914 and at the same time, announce that masturbation is now a conscience matter.

  • Vidiot
    Vidiot

    “Important frivolities”…

    …that’s good, I gotta remember that one.

    😏

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit