Talking snakes don't bother me so much after I saw a talking jalapeno.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6NzfoWfXnCs
Incidentally, in my linked note I added a comment about Pangaea and Panthalassa.
gen 1: 11 says: .
11 then god said, “let the earth sprout [j]vegetation, [k]plants yielding seed, and fruit trees on the earth bearing fruit according to [l]their kind [m]with seed in them”; and it was so.
12 the earth produced [n]vegetation, [o]plants yielding seed according to [p]their kind, and trees bearing fruit [q]with seed in them, according to [r]their kind; and god saw that it was good.
Talking snakes don't bother me so much after I saw a talking jalapeno.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6NzfoWfXnCs
Incidentally, in my linked note I added a comment about Pangaea and Panthalassa.
gen 1: 11 says: .
11 then god said, “let the earth sprout [j]vegetation, [k]plants yielding seed, and fruit trees on the earth bearing fruit according to [l]their kind [m]with seed in them”; and it was so.
12 the earth produced [n]vegetation, [o]plants yielding seed according to [p]their kind, and trees bearing fruit [q]with seed in them, according to [r]their kind; and god saw that it was good.
gen 1: 11 says: .
11 then god said, “let the earth sprout [j]vegetation, [k]plants yielding seed, and fruit trees on the earth bearing fruit according to [l]their kind [m]with seed in them”; and it was so.
12 the earth produced [n]vegetation, [o]plants yielding seed according to [p]their kind, and trees bearing fruit [q]with seed in them, according to [r]their kind; and god saw that it was good.
The writer of the Genesis 1 account is employing a literary structure that would be audibly memorable to his expected (Hebrew) audience who (for the vast majority) would not have had a personal copy of the account.
Genesis 1:1-2 parallels with Genesis 2:1-3, not Genesis 1:16 . And Genesis 1:16 (actually, Gen 1:14-19) parallels with Genesis 1:3-5. (See here.)
i have heard a few whispers that once again they are going to be changing the generation teaching.
does anybody have on info on this?.
i would love to be able to hit my family with a. .
On Sodom's sin, see Ezek 16:49, 50 (here). Some of the wording in those verses could be applied to homosexuality. The wording is similar to that used in Leviticus 18 about men having relations with men. But there are numerous other things that she was also accused of in those verses in Ezekiel.
what song takes you back there?.
here's mine: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=brb7rupqtsg&ab_channel=danielaaguilar.
It;s the End of the World As We Know It (And I Feel Fine)
the first 3 presidents of the i.b.s.a ./ jehovah`s witnesses / wtb&ts.. w.h.conley ,c.t.russell ,j.f.rutherford .. how many jehovah`s witnesses know that ?
how many ex jehovah`s witnesses knew that ?
the wt society teaches that jesus returned to begin his "invisible presence" in 1914 directing his attention toward the earth as ruling king.
And if they weren't shunned by God for not getting 1914 right (in their current view), wouldn't it be appropriate for them to cut some slack to those who even now have a problem with 1914?
Instead, they behave like the slave in Mt 18:23-35.
according to the watchtower's insight encyclopedia : .
the catastrophic destruction of men and animals by an overwhelming flood in the days of noah, 2370 b.c.e.
this greatest cataclysm in all human history was sent by jehovah because wicked men had filled the earth with violence.
the watchtower teaches that the opportunity to be born again and enjoy complete justification with god ended in 1935, having been limited to only 144k since pentecost.
so, it is very surprising that the watchtower embraces the death that is described in romans chapter 6, since this is the very death that is required to be born again…… which is denied to watchtower members!
romans chapter 6, verse 7 is about saying goodbye to the old personality, the “old man” in the king james version.
The WT misunderstanding can be seen in the NWT rendering of Rom 6:7. It says "... acquitted from his sin." At least in the older NWT "his" was in brackets ( "[his]" ). But the newer one has taken the brackets out.
The english rendering in the KIT has "the sin" where the definite article is actually feminine (τῆς) because the greek word for sin is feminine and usually left untranslated, since in english we would not normally say "the sin" unless we were speaking about a specific sin. (Compare here.)
In Rom 6:7 "sin" is being spoken of as a force operating within a person, so that, when a person literally dies he would no longer be subject to that force. And thus, according to Paul's argument, if a person has figuratively died (thru baptism) he should no longer live as if he were still under the control of sin. His figurative death has "freed" him from sin.
"Acquitted" is also misleading, and based on the WT's misunderstanding of the passage. But the WT would correctly counter-argue that "acquitted" is a possible rendering of the word. So you wouldn't get anywhere trying to argue with the WT. They are smug in their self assurance that they are right.
the watchtower has many schools to teach their members on how to become more effective in various assignments in jehovah's organization.
they are trained to strengthen and help the congregations and branches around the world.
here is a list of some of the schools the society run:.
the watchtower has many schools to teach their members on how to become more effective in various assignments in jehovah's organization.
they are trained to strengthen and help the congregations and branches around the world.
here is a list of some of the schools the society run:.
Hi R&R,
are you implying that there are literal, breathing human members on this earth that are part of the 144,000 and that the Governing Body dismiss them so that the ''remnant'' are silenced and put off to the side?
Actually, no. No one alive on earth is of the 144,000. But some explanation is in order.
The 144,000 of Rev 7:1-8 are a sub-group "sealed out of every tribe of the sons of Israel." (Rev 7:4 rNWT) "Out of" is the Greek preposition ek. It is used numerous times in Rev 7:4-8 to describe the grouping of 12,000 "out of" each tribe. WT would have you believe that the 144,000 make up that whole nation. But "out of" indicates that they are a smaller group or sub-group "out of" a larger group called "every tribe of the sons of Israel." This can be seen from Rev 7:9 where the "great crowd" are described as being "out of" (same preposition) every nation and tribe and people and language."
It is easy to see that the "great crowd" are a sub-group "out of" a larger grouping that comprises all of humanity. In the same way, "every tribe of the sons of Israel" is a sub-group "out of" a larger group comprised of all of humanity. And the 144,000 are a sub-group "out of" the sub-group that is called every tribe of the sons of Israel."
Now, some think that "every tribe of the sons of Israel" refers to natural Jews. Some (like me) believe they are Christians. But that is unimportant for this post. What is important is to see that the 144,000 are a sub-grouping of "every tribe of the sons of Israel."
As I pointed out above, the WT teaches that the 144,000 are the whole of "the sons of Israel." And they teach that only these 144,000 are anointed with God's Spirit. And from that they want JWs to assume that the leadership is of this 144,000 and that the leadership is anointed with God's Spirit. Every one else are merely friends of these and need to be subservient to these ones if they want to gain life and be friends of God.
This is the gist of the WT's power structure over all of JWs. And this is why they do their best to discourage anyone else from thinking they are anointed and from partaking at the Memorial (which the WT sees as the sole privilege of the 144,000).
The truth is that being baptized in the Spirit is part and parcel with the New Covenant. But it is available to all. (Acts 2:38-39) It is available to all who have faith. But JWs (most of them anyways) have had that faith drilled out of them by the WT. The WT finds them more useful without it. Eventually there has to be some repercussions for that for the GB and the WT. (Jas 3:1)
The giving of the Spirit was the one thing that would make the New Covenant better than the Old Covenant. This was foretold by the prophets. (Jer 31:31-34; Ezek 36:24-29) And this is why Jesus chided Nicodemus for being a "teacher in Israel" and yet not understanding this coming change. (Jn 3:5, 9-10) Jesus said that being born of "water and spirit" was a prerequisite to 'entering the kingdom' (Jn 3:5), which the disciples later understood to mean 'being saved' and 'entering into life.' (Mt 19:16, 17, 23-25)
I'm sorry for the length of this post, but it is necessary to see that. (And I want any lurkers to see this also.) The WT wants its followers to think that being born of the Spirit is only necessary to be in the New Covenant and to rule with Jesus in heaven. There is truth in the idea that being born of the Spirit is part of being in the New Covenant. But the idea that only 144,000 would be in the New Covenant is a huge distortion of what the NT teaches. Paul spoke of those in the New Covenant eventually outnumbering those in the Old Covenant. (Gal 4:21-27)
But back to the 144,000. Rev 7:1-8; 14:1-5 say nothing about being born of the Spirit. If "every tribe of the sons of Israel" does represent Christianity, then, according to NT teaching, all of them would be born of the Spirit, not just the 144,000. The 144,000, as a sub-group, are distinct from the larger group in some way. They have some experience that is unique to them. And if what I said in my previous post is correct, that is, if Rev 7:1-8 is an expansion on Rev 6:9-11, then, the 144,000 represent the "full number" of those who are martyred as Christians. Their "song" that only they know (Rev 14:3) would likely be related to that unique experience of being faithful Christian martyrs.
And thus, assuming all this to be the case, no one alive on earth would be of that group, simply due to the fact that they were still alive. God would know who He would allow to be of that group. (Compare Mt 20:22, 23) And He would also know whether some who had been martyred were qualified as such. For example, during Nero's purge of Christians in 64-68 CE, there were likely Christians who were swept up and slaughtered in the persecution but were living double lives and/or secretly unfaithful in some way. Such ones would not fit the description of the 144,000 in Rev 14:4, 5. So that it would be impossible for any human to calculate how far along it was in the gathering of the 144,000. The "sealing" of them (Rev 7:3, 4) would indicate when they had been included in that number. (And thus, had been martyred.) Only God (and possibly Christ) would have inside information on the progress of the gathering of the 144,000. (And thus, the "sealing" of Rev 7:3, 4 is no secondary anointing which the WT teaches but the NT says nothing about. (Compare Eph 4:30)
I'm sorry for the long winded explanation. But I know that there are numerous lurkers who would find this subject of interest since the WT controls their life as Christians with all of their distortions.