MacEwan [the WT lawyer] said it’s the position of the Jehovah’s Witnesses that the documents being sought [i.e. Judicial Committee documents] are the religious minister’s personal information.
“These are the personal notes that have to do with spiritual, pastoral care that they offer congregants. We’re talking about certain types of confidential communications and notes. That’s what we’re dealing with here.”
Wow! What a bald faced lie that is.
Ironically, the JC "documents" include any notes the JC confiscated from the accused. And if a particular member of the JC is removed from being an elder, do you think he will still have access to his "personal information" [i.e. the JC notes]?
Also, the accused was right there during the JC meeting. It's not like the law was trying to give the information to uninvolved people.
It's more than a little amazing the lengths the WT will go in their blatant lies.