a thought regarding a recent public talk i heard:.
.
if christians are truly supposed to be odedient & faithful in all things (to the organization), because jah has always used an organization, then shouldn't the jews around jesus days have done the same thing towards the sanhedrin/priests (even though they were corrupt)?.
A thought regarding a recent public talk I heard:
If Christians are truly supposed to be odedient & faithful in all things (to the organization), because Jah has always used an organization, then shouldn't the Jews around Jesus days have done the same thing towards the Sanhedrin/Priests (even though they were corrupt)?
two jehovah's witnesses 'murdered 13 people on mission from god to cleanse world of sinners'.
by will stewart.
updated: 07:43 est, 25 september 2008 .
Yeah...this looks like Russian propaganda. Just keep religions from tax-exempt status. Nuff-said. That will do the trick. Once that is done, no need for physical retaliation, arrest, etc.
1961 kingdom service questions: personal references to watch tower publications on moral matters..this booklet is the property of the_____________________congregation.
it is to be retained in the congregation permanent file.
its counsel is for the guidance of the congregation committee in handling matters with members of the congregation.
and...thanks atlantis
1961 kingdom service questions: personal references to watch tower publications on moral matters..this booklet is the property of the_____________________congregation.
it is to be retained in the congregation permanent file.
its counsel is for the guidance of the congregation committee in handling matters with members of the congregation.
On page 57, does anyone know what "she is like an unintentional first offender, and should be dealt with accordingly." means?
so my spouse was just telling me how he/she was having a conversation with a doubting active witness.
my spouse was telling them the doubt he/she had regarding blood transfusions and how he/she wasn't sure anymore.. .
i was like "cautious as serpent, innocent as a dove".
actually yes, they are transgender. i had to write the WT and find out if I could get a scriptual divorce. j/k
in this week's study article of the wt (11/15/12, p. 17, paragraph 6) it says does not single out the annointed for the scripture "we are god's fellow workers.
" (1 cor.
does the wt consider the "great crowd" fellow workers with god now?.
In this week's study article of the WT (11/15/12, p. 17, paragraph 6) it says does not single out the annointed for the scripture "We are God's fellow workers." (1 Cor. 3:9)
Does the WT consider the "great crowd" fellow workers with God now?
piers morgan decided to advocate gun control after sandy hook.
that caused this radio host, alex jones, who has millions of listeners to create a petition to have piers deported.
piers invited alex on his show to have a civil debate about guns.
Here is the BIG problem in the gun control debate:
You have to specify a goal. Seriously! What do the gun control advocates want? Is it less massacres plain and simple? Or, do they desire less actual assaults/murders/armed robberies nationwide, regardless of the weapon used.
I want to attack this problem with the goal of making the change that will decrease the total number of assaults/murders/armed robberies nationwide, not simply those where guns were used. If you are simply accounting for semi-auto deaths, then you wouldn't be able to count in the Oklahoma bombing deaths/injuries.
Can you see the lack of logic that many gun control advocates use? They are demonizing a particular type of weapon. If banning semi-automatic weapons would bring down the total number of assaults/murders/armed robberies nationwide (every weapon, including fists & explosives), then I can see the point of a ban.
However, when the average assault/murder/robbery is performed, do you really think the perpetrator is unloading more than a couple shots?
Let the logic in, and set your emotions aside for a moment.
Again, what would gun control advocates like to see as a result of banning semi-autos or all guns? Which would they like banned? What is their ultimate goal? Specifically. Someone please tell me?
first off, i love frequenting this forum.
it has given me the opportunity to truly put jw stuff to the test and i thank everyone for their helpful responses.. however, i have noticed a couple things.. 1) the use of the word "troll" is completely childish.
this is no different than the name calling used by jws (e.g.
First off, I love frequenting this forum. It has given me the opportunity to TRULY put JW stuff to the test and I thank everyone for their helpful responses.
However, I have noticed a couple things.
1) The use of the word "troll" is completely childish. This is no different than the name calling used by JWs (e.g. apostate). I am actually surprised the admins lets people use that word, since it is unconstructive, a degrading name, and smacks of immaturity.
2) Some posters are WAY to emotionally compromised by the discussions. They revert to acting like school children often, obviously because they feel either guilt, hatred, or extreme anger. Seriously, if you are really convinced that you are doing the right thing, you wouldn't be so emotionally compromised. Just take me for example! :)
3) Finally, some posters really need to learn how logical fallacies work both ways. Being able to admit when you are wrong is a strength.
Again, thanks to everyone (especially Atlantis) for helping me.
has anyone watched this?
dude!
this new jw.org site makes me feel like jws are mormons!
Has anyone watched this? Dude! This new jw.org site makes me feel like jws are mormons! Yuck. Smacks of Christendom.
http://www.jw.org/en/news/by-region/americas/united-states/video-clip-hurricane-sandy-relief/
i heard from a fellow jw that there was scandal in the dc area because black jws were voting the 2012 election (or maybe its was the 2008 election).
is this true?.
I heard from a fellow JW that there was scandal in the DC area because black JWs were voting the 2012 election (or maybe its was the 2008 election). Is this true?
