My answer to your question is a NO.
but I'm curious why the society hasn't conceded they got the 607 date wrong, because wouldn't that give them 20 more years of 'this generation', moving the date from 1914 to 1934? Yeah, they lose the WWI coincidence, but they gain 20 years for their false prophesy.
Any thoughts on this? Am I missing something?
(oh, besides the fact that they don't outright admit their own mistakes)
i think they could blame someone else, like "historians previously believed 607 to be the date Jerusalem was destroyed, but we have discovered that it was actually 587...". I think this would get the rank and file REALLY excited, and they would have a new date to work with, which is what they really want anyway. This organization LIVES on dates and that has been their obsession since the start. They could nullify their silly generation overlap thing, and, for 10 to 20 years, keep the singular generation thing going.
I actually don't remember how to calculate 1914 using 607, have thrown away my old live forever books, and am probably missing something big...