A fossil does not indicate that they were hairy.
'nuff said.
having read i love ttatt's thread about evidence for humans living more than 6,000 years ago, i responded by using neanderthals and homo ergaster as evidence.
.
this got me thinking about the wt's current view on 'cavemen' (), etc.. so, how does the wts view 'ancient humans'?
A fossil does not indicate that they were hairy.
'nuff said.
i'd rather them not even question him at this point.
by allowing a video link, they put the ball 100% in his court.
i don't get what they expect to accomplish by having a video link only.. 2. he won't feel any pressure.
All I'm hoping for are some answers to the questions Angus puts to him.
I'm hoping that GJ will finally realise what damage is being done and how poor and harmful the WT procedures are. If he can admit to that like the other elders and the expert witness did, that will be enough, a huge achievement in fact.
I don't expect anything significant to come of the questioning, certainly not any bombshells or revelations.
For me it will be of more consequence once the RC has made it's rulings, then to see if the WT tries to get out of implementing them.
Their tactic will be to agree to doing everything recommended, but then doing few or none of them in actuality.
They will rely on their crafty wording to play a game, as they always do.
program sponsors child's medical procedure .
indiana, usa.
http://www.greenfieldreporter.com/view/local_story/program-sponsors-children-s-me_1439338349.
hi guys, .
in discussions with a current jw, they told me that have big concerns with regards to the 607 bce date, but they are waiting on jehovah for refining.
any suggestions on questions to pose to them based on their feedback?.
Lot's of examples where a faithful person did not 'wait on Jehovah' but did the right thing.
Look at the kings and judges, Moses, Daniel, Jehu, Jael, Jesus.
All these did what they knew to be right because they were faithful and jealous for God.
Examples of those who did wait expectantly while doing the wrong thing includes the pharisees.
"Wait on Jehovah" is nothing more than a cowardly excuse to justify inaction.
If you know something is wrong than you have a personal responsibility.
For a great resource on 587BCE vs 607BCE see this video series.
Lot's of short clips dealing with one aspect at a time.
hi friends!.
i normally post over on /r/exjw but i've been reading more and more over here on this forum and found it incredibly supportive and informative.
i hope to participate in this community and become an active member.
Hi mulder_scully, nice mash-up!
One of the elders emotively stated he felt sickened by what he heard, but then went on to say he can't remember what he heard, just that he remembers being sickened by it.
I think the court room rolled their eyes at that point.
No credibility.
i emailed mr. stewart about jackson's testimony, asking if the video link would be visible to the public.. this was his prompt reply:.
thank you dianne for your interest.
the it people tell me that mr jackson will be on the screen for all to see and hear.regardsangus stewart.
supposing you were called to give evidence by an inquiry.
how would you answer?
are you concerned that you may end up being called to give evidence for past involvement in judicial committees to future inquiries?
There is no process Mephis.
None of my BoE have any clue whatsoever about the legal side of the charity. Becoming an elder is purely about the WT organisation.
The one legal thing they do each year is hold an AGM and announce some figures to the congregation. Because our income is so low we don't even have to report our financials to the Charity Commission.
what do you think of the following line of reasoning for helping a jw start to think about what they are admitting.. (essentially, the organisations way of handling child abuse has been wrong, harm has been caused, god is now putting it right.).
reply:.
"i appreciate your honesty, in admitting that child abuse has not been handled in the right way in the past.
the royal commissions public hearing into the jehovahs witnesses will recommence in sydney on friday 14 august 2015 at 11:00am.. it is anticipated that the hearing will hear from one witness, mr geoffrey jackson, a member of the governing body of jehovahs witnesses.. .
.
www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/media-centre/media-releases/2015-08/public-hearing-into-the-jehovah%e2%80%99s-witnesses-to-rec.
supposing you were called to give evidence by an inquiry.
how would you answer?
are you concerned that you may end up being called to give evidence for past involvement in judicial committees to future inquiries?
I've never been on any abuse cases, children or otherwise. The only ones I've been on involved consenting adults.
I'd not put myself in opposition to the law but give a full account of everything they asked. This isn't a recent stance, it is something I would always have done.