Hi all,
Bill and Maximus, thanks for the information. I've just been to the site and started reading the letters...I didn't get past the first part of the second one and I apologize for going a little off topic here but I can't help myself. I quote from the second BOE letter:
It must be recognized that the time you can spend in helping an abuse victim is limited. Therefore, this shepherding responsibility must be balanced with your other responsibilities, which include caring for the spiritual, emotional, and material needs of your own family and assisting those in the congregation who have other problems. In some cases an incest survivor wants more attention than you can give. So some elders have found it beneficial to put boundaries, or some limits, on the time they spend.
This steams the hell out of me!!! They set themselves up as being QUALIFIED to help survivors of abuse; they direct the R&F to come to the elders for help as a 'safe haven'; THEN THEY SAY LIMIT THE AMOUNT OF HELP YOU GIVE A VICTIM!!!! Am I the only one who sees the irony here?? Particularly am I disgusted with the sentence about an incest survivor 'wanting more attention'...implying that the survivor is somehow wrong for needing a great amount of help. So easy from this letter for elders to justify their NON help and NON concern as reasonably setting limits. Jesus Christ, they disgust me. Now I know why I was treated the way that I was when I approached the elders for help. At first, they were very kind and loving...but after time progressed, I reckon they figured I needed a lesson in boundary setting; after all, I was just another incest survivor taking up too much of their time.
Thanks for the info guys and for letting me rant.
Dana
"I undid his head collar and took him outside for a drink, and felt, if not exactly a communion with him, at least an awareness of being a fellow creature on a lonely planet."
Dick Francis in "To The Hilt"