FedUpJW

Joined

• started 37 topics
• posted 2,333 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by FedUpJW

• 
  162

  2017 Convention Video To Be Shown Regarding The 1975 Failure

  by pale.emperor in

  1. watchtower
  2. scandals

  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=go3arnnsfkk&feature=youtu.be.

  no mention whatsoever that it was watchtower themselves that strongly hinted towards this date.

  instead they blame those who "put their trust in a date, not jehovah".. let's recap... .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  FedUpJW

  Going here is dangerous for the Organization, and it may well only compound the problems with their "Armageddon is just around the corner" credibility.

  Not being intentionally contrary, I somewhat disagree with this. It is by design that they bring this out, now. It is designed to weed out any and all Dubbies who are smart enough to connect the dots. After they have gotten rid of anyone who remembers and says a word of disagreement about 1975 they will (as someone already mentioned) refer to the "Great Apostasy" of 2017 and praise Jah for the most needed "cleansing" that was accomplished in clearing out faithless ones who only served with dates in mind.
  
• 
  162

  2017 Convention Video To Be Shown Regarding The 1975 Failure

  by pale.emperor in

  1. watchtower
  2. scandals

  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=go3arnnsfkk&feature=youtu.be.

  no mention whatsoever that it was watchtower themselves that strongly hinted towards this date.

  instead they blame those who "put their trust in a date, not jehovah".. let's recap... .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  FedUpJW

  When you know your argument is weak, it's time to appeal to emotions.

  Emotional manipulation is all they have left.
  
• 
  162

  2017 Convention Video To Be Shown Regarding The 1975 Failure

  by pale.emperor in

  1. watchtower
  2. scandals

  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=go3arnnsfkk&feature=youtu.be.

  no mention whatsoever that it was watchtower themselves that strongly hinted towards this date.

  instead they blame those who "put their trust in a date, not jehovah".. let's recap... .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  FedUpJW

  LURKERS; IF THIS PISSES YOU OFF AND YOU ARE STUCK IN....VOTE WITH YOUR WALLETS!

  That is exactly what I have done, and most recently when they passed out the pledge slips to find out how much more money they could milk from the congregation to spend at the orders of the LDC I wrote a big fat ZERO on it and turned it in. Do I care they know who did it? H--L NO!
  
• 
  30

  Marrying yourself is now a thing....

  by James Mixon in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  ok i'am old so i need some help to understand this new thing, what's the point in marrying yourself?

  this sound like a gb brain storm idea....i guess you can never commit adultery....

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  FedUpJW

  There once was a man from Nantucket.....

  .....whose c--k was so long he could suck it.....

  (Next)
  
• 
  41

  May 15, 2017 TO ALL BODIES OF ELDERS Re: Regular Pioneers

  by wifibandit in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  may 15, 2017 to all bodies of elders re: regular pioneers.

  uk version.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  FedUpJW

  Being humane and sensitive to individual needs of JW's is NOT in the WT leaders vocabulary.

  Of course not. Dubbies are all about putting everyone and everything WT related FIRST. A DF'd friends elderly single mother just had major surgery, she spent years door knocking as a reg. pio. and now two weeks after surgery has yet to have anyone from her KH come by her home, send a get well card, telephone (the secretary did call though to tell her she hadn't turned in her "service" report for April though), or anything. Nope, it's up to the DF'd friend to do everything including working full time while their mom heals and is incapacitated.
  
• 
  21

  How serious is sexting

  by Homer notsimpson in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  some of y'all may know why i am asking this, but i am curious about it.. sexting in the elders book says it's enough to warrant a jc but it's very loose at it... what's y'all opinion?

  do elders care alot of it?

  what if it's an old case?

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  FedUpJW

  Q) How serious do Elders view sexting? A) It depends who's sexting?

  It's wrong as long as the eldurrs are not getting their jollies. As long as they get theirs...no problem, carry on!.
  
• 
  27

  Apostasy endorsed in this yesterday's Watchtower Study

  by doubtfull1799 in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  “there may be occasions when it would be good for us to reconsider a choice or decision.

  it could be when the prevailing circumstances change.

  jehovah altered his decision at times when circumstances changed.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  FedUpJW

  In many respects, if we let others make our decisions, we are essentially deciding to “follow them.”
  

  So says the governing body, as they continue to dictate what one should wear, how one should groom themselves, what entertainment they can engage in, what education they should have, how much money they should save, what kind of vehicle they should buy, who they should marry, when they should marry, what two married people can do in the privacy of their own home, that one must pioneer, etc.

  Can anyone really not see the hypocrisy of what these chuckle-heads write?
  
• 
  27

  Apostasy endorsed in this yesterday's Watchtower Study

  by doubtfull1799 in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  “there may be occasions when it would be good for us to reconsider a choice or decision.

  it could be when the prevailing circumstances change.

  jehovah altered his decision at times when circumstances changed.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  FedUpJW

  I agree that they are covering their asses, possibly going to come out with a big change soon,

  I still firmly believe that they are going to refine a.k.a. completely abandon the idea of 144,000 as the ONLY ones going to heaven. They must do something to make the increasing numbers of partakers make sense. Three classes of people. Those who are alleged to be the 'little flock', those who are the 'great crowd' in heaven, and those who supposedly will pet pandas on earth forever.
  
• 
  27

  Apostasy endorsed in this yesterday's Watchtower Study

  by doubtfull1799 in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  “there may be occasions when it would be good for us to reconsider a choice or decision.

  it could be when the prevailing circumstances change.

  jehovah altered his decision at times when circumstances changed.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  FedUpJW

  strange that wt will disfellowship people for disagreeing on doctrinal decisions , they made, that they later change, but will not automatically reinstate those that had it right in the first place,

  I tried making that point some years ago when the "light" got brighter and the gb decided that they and only they were the "the slave". Thirty-five years or more ago at least one person was DF'd for believing that "the slave" could not be all self-proclaimed anointed on earth and could only be a small group of men. I wonder why he wasn't posthumously reinstated now that that is the current "truth"?
  
• 
  14

  JW Cultish Thoughts about RIP!

  by Iamallcool in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  ones who are lovers of jehovah .

  dont say rip .

  rip is also pagan in origin.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  FedUpJW

  Saying 'rest' in peace, or more often writing R.I.P after a deceased person's name, is primarily a way of showing respect to the dead person and the feelings of their relatives.

  And that is the reason WT would not promote saying R.I.P. If it is a tool of the devil to remove ones hat or tip it to the ladies, and if it is a tool of the devil to stand up when a woman enters the room, then "evidently" it must be a tool of the devil promoting self-worship to show any respect for a dead person or their relatives by saying-thinking-or writing R.I.P.

  Now didn't I sound like a "good" little Dubbie?