Is there any “proof” yet???
Of course there is. Don't we all KNOW that the absence of any credible proof just somehow has to be proof? The left just doesn't seem to get the fact that THERE IS NO PROOF!
Is there any “proof” yet???
Of course there is. Don't we all KNOW that the absence of any credible proof just somehow has to be proof? The left just doesn't seem to get the fact that THERE IS NO PROOF!
it’s just the “new light” is much better and brighter than the old light.
1965: more “new light.” these men will be resurrected, for sure.. 1988: jehovah apparently changed his mind once again.
the light gets brighter.
...unless the individuals themselves were yapping about it in which case I consider them pretty stupid.
DING...DING...DING!! We have a winner folks!
for family worship last night, our family watched remember the wife of lot movie since it will be discussed in the meeting this week.
there’s a few things i noticed that i didn’t think about last time i watched it.. first, the dad is very of course against his daughters going to college or even trying to find a good job.
yet he does accounting, which is a very good job that almost always requires a college education.
...adults believing Paul Bunyan and Babe, the blue ox where real.
Oh, but they are. I saw a statue of them in a Minnesota town years ago.
what are you thoughts on this?.
i find this alarming because jones was very outspoken and had great guests on discussing topics most other media outlets wouldn't go near.. the fact that many have restricted him access to their medium what does this say on our freedoms of speech?.
If whoever runs YouTube chooses to ban something, they have every right to do so because it is their platform.
If whoever runs a bakery chooses to decline to make a cake for a homosexual wedding, they have every right to do so because it is their bakery. See how that works?
what are you thoughts on this?.
i find this alarming because jones was very outspoken and had great guests on discussing topics most other media outlets wouldn't go near.. the fact that many have restricted him access to their medium what does this say on our freedoms of speech?.
The fact that many have restricted him access to their medium what does this say on our freedoms of speech?
That the oh so tolerant left only tolerates freedom of speech IF you say what they want you to say. Kind of like JW's, IMO.
here's the outlines in english and spanish, grouped together in order for september 2018-february 2019.. english: https://we.tl/6orrqltrya.
spanish: https://we.tl/6w0acsdefr.
as per usual, these links will expire in 7 days from the date of this post so get them whilst they're hot!.
Situation: A brother reads a news article on the Internet that contains false accusations and half- truths about Jehovah’s Witnesses. He begins to harbor doubts and lose his spiritual balance.
As commented in the past...It is strange that when it is news reports of a church of Christendom it is God bringing it to light, but when it is the EXACT same thing about the Dubs, it is "half-truths", misleading, or lies! Damned sorry hypocrites!!
for ex jws, pimos, pomos, faders, born again christians, agnostics, atheists, etc.
what is your opinion regarding sex before marriage, has your view been influenced since you left?
in western society, you’ll probably find yourself ridiculed to be an 18 year old virgin so i am curious to hear opinions from here.
Pre-maritalsex comes with consequences.
There, I fixed it for you.
From the article: "Only baptized Witnesses who commit a serious sin and do not repent can be shunned, according to the website. Repentant individuals are welcomed back into the fold."
Any JDub who says that is outright lying! We know that being shunned in the JDub community is a matter of whose ass you kiss or do not kiss. And "repentant" individuals are NEVER truly welcomed back into the fold! A person's past will ALWAYS be brought up as a black mark to be used as a club whenever someone feels they need to beat you a little bit more!
1 timothy 2:11-15let a woman learn in silence with full submissiveness.
i do not permit a woman to teach, or to exercise authority over a man, but to be in silence.
for adam was formed first, then eve.
Do they not realise that it makes the women look odd and out of place?
Of course they do, but they do not care. That is the whole point of most of what the governing body trots out concerning women as being words from the mouth of God. To make as many other people as they can look as stupid as they themselves are.
for ex jws, pimos, pomos, faders, born again christians, agnostics, atheists, etc.
what is your opinion regarding sex before marriage, has your view been influenced since you left?
in western society, you’ll probably find yourself ridiculed to be an 18 year old virgin so i am curious to hear opinions from here.
How else would two people know if they're sexually compatible?
One wouldn't buy a vehicle without taking it out for a drive, nor would one buy a pair of shoes without trying them on. So why would one marry someone without knowing they would be sexually compatible? You wouldn't. Of course the Dubs only think of the actual physical mechanics of sex, and the mechanics are pretty much common universally.
Personally, now that I do not have THAT goofy conduct ban hanging over my head I have found that "recreational" sex is some of the BEST sex. I am an official member of the 4-F club.