searchfothetruth

Joined

• started 62 topics
• posted 968 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by searchfothetruth

• 
  32

  Why Britain wants to be part of Europe.............NOT !

  by mattnoel in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  i am so fed up with this whole europe thing.

  i as a british person do not feel that it is fair that we are not being given the right to vote as to wether we go into europe full hog and the euro so that we can lose our status as a country !

  get higher taxes etc to support the poorer countries.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  searchfothetruth
• 
  865

  WoMD ... so where are they?

  by Simon in

  1. social
  2. current

  now, the war is over, the weapons were not used and of course have not been found.. how threatening could they be if they did not even use them when being invaded by a massive force (of the countries they hate)?!

  perhaps, as many suspect, they didn't use them because they didn't have them?.

  now we're being told that we'll have to be patient and give them time to find them.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  searchfothetruth

  Sixofnine,

  If I felt that this was going to be the end of the matter then I probably would be happy for the regime change, but it isn't the end and the Iraqi people are no better off now than they were before.

  The only difference is that the US, and Dick Cheney's Halliburton, now own the oil, lock, stock and barrel.

  The US are already using the same threats against Syria and it's just a matter of time till they decide that that country is also a 'threat' and attack that one.

  The whole issue of the attack by the US/Britain hinged on the WMD being there.

  The UN said that there was NO evidence before the attack, and also insisted that the Iraq army and total defense capability were only at about 10% of the 1991 force, but still they persisted with the excuse that they urgently needed to get in there.

  There were also NO links to Osama Bin Laden and Saddam Hussein, no proof whatsoever, so what you have is excuse after excuse being made to attack another country.
• 
  865

  WoMD ... so where are they?

  by Simon in

  1. social
  2. current

  now, the war is over, the weapons were not used and of course have not been found.. how threatening could they be if they did not even use them when being invaded by a massive force (of the countries they hate)?!

  perhaps, as many suspect, they didn't use them because they didn't have them?.

  now we're being told that we'll have to be patient and give them time to find them.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  searchfothetruth

  If you consider the regime of Saddam Hussein a WMD then surely the regime of GW Bush must also be considered the same, considering the destruction it has just perpetrated on Iraq.

  The issue of WMD was the reason the British and US governments used to attack another sovreign state, and the fact they are no-where to be found proves that it was an excuse...that is now trying to be brushed under the floor.

  Lawrence Eagleburger, former member of Father Bush's government said in an interview before the war that IF NO WMD were found then Bush was finished, but that was before, and that has been forgotten.
• 
  119

  If Your JW Relative Needed Blood, Would You Force It On Them?

  by minimus in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  due to the fact that most of us do not feel that it is scripturally wrong to take blood, if your relative was told that they needed a transfusion and you could see that they get it, even if it's against their wishes, would you force blood into them??

  ?

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  searchfothetruth

  After I have read all the other responses I still think I would do everything in my power to force a transfusion onto a loved one. I would rather them resent me and be alive, than be dead.

  Only my opinion.
• 
  865

  WoMD ... so where are they?

  by Simon in

  1. social
  2. current

  now, the war is over, the weapons were not used and of course have not been found.. how threatening could they be if they did not even use them when being invaded by a massive force (of the countries they hate)?!

  perhaps, as many suspect, they didn't use them because they didn't have them?.

  now we're being told that we'll have to be patient and give them time to find them.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  searchfothetruth

  Are these the same mobile chemical weapons labs that Colin Powell showed to the UN but were totally innocent?

  Thery haven't found any WMD because there are none to be found.
• 
  28

  A BALTANT LIE in this weeks Isaiah study.

  by apocalypse in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  a baltant lie in this weeks isaiah study.. .

  in this weeks book study of the book isaiah vol.2, there is the paragraph i copied here below, page 253 par.

  12. read it carefully, and then see the comments below.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  searchfothetruth

  Well I stand corrected....
• 
  119

  If Your JW Relative Needed Blood, Would You Force It On Them?

  by minimus in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  due to the fact that most of us do not feel that it is scripturally wrong to take blood, if your relative was told that they needed a transfusion and you could see that they get it, even if it's against their wishes, would you force blood into them??

  ?

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  searchfothetruth

  Too right I would....

  It saved my life last year and I wouldn't be here to annoy everyone if I hadn't taken it.
• 
  59

  If This Place Was A Congregation, Who Would Be The Elders, MS and CO's?

  by minimus in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  i know some of you hate the idea of jwd being like a congregation but just for fun, let's imagine who would "serve" as the elders (presiding overseer, secretary, service overseer) etc.

  and what "privileges" you would be given.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  searchfothetruth

  I'd be the microphone attendant and miss out the people who's answers didn't agree with the official line ( i.e. mine )
• 
  28

  A BALTANT LIE in this weeks Isaiah study.

  by apocalypse in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  a baltant lie in this weeks isaiah study.. .

  in this weeks book study of the book isaiah vol.2, there is the paragraph i copied here below, page 253 par.

  12. read it carefully, and then see the comments below.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  searchfothetruth

  But I thought that Rutherford introduced the class of other sheep with the earthly hope in 1935.

  There was no two classes before the assembly in which he made this talk and introduced this doctrine.

  My mum always gives me the example of a sister who burst out crying at this assembly because she had never felt she wanted to go to heaven, which had been taught up to this point.

  This was a baltant blatant lie, because most of the witnesses will never be told any different.
• 
  28

  A BALTANT LIE in this weeks Isaiah study.

  by apocalypse in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  a baltant lie in this weeks isaiah study.. .

  in this weeks book study of the book isaiah vol.2, there is the paragraph i copied here below, page 253 par.

  12. read it carefully, and then see the comments below.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  searchfothetruth

  Thanks Apocalypse,

  Yet another one to add to the list...I think my mum needs another visit...so i'll expect the elders shortly.

  Dansk

  It means the same as blaytent but with even more intent behind it...don't you know anything