You said that saddam kicked out the inspectors. From what I can see they were pulled out. kicked out != pulled out. Why are the papers now saying that Saddam kicked them out when four years ago they were saying they were pulled out? Which is it? You then tell me to put down the crack pipe and make some sense? Am I missing something here?
So what exactly are you trying to say then?
Not trying to say anything other than what I posted? However, if you want to get more into detail, ok. Some of the UN inspectors were spies working for the west
When he and Bush "demand" the return of the UN inspectors to Iraq, what they they omit to say is that the inspectors were never thrown out by Iraq, but ordered out by the UN after it was discovered they were being used as a cover for American spying.
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/allnews/page.cfm?objectid=12148547&method=full&siteid=50143
When United Nations inspectors last scoured Iraq for weapons of mass destruction in 1998, the CIA and its sister spy services were rarely far away.
Undercover U.S. agents working with the U.N. teams secretly planted a high-tech "black box" device in Baghdad that year to eavesdrop on Saddam Hussein's phone calls, among other Iraqi communications, former inspectors say. The signals then were encrypted in other U.N. data and transmitted via satellite to the National Security Agency headquarters at Ft. Meade, Md.
Other operatives helped the U.N. team track Iraqi officials abroad. In one case, they planted hidden cameras and microphones in the hotel room of an Iraqi scientist trying to buy banned missile parts in Romania and then sneaked into his room at night to photograph the contents of his briefcase.
http://www.latimes.com/la-fg-usiraq23oct23,0,4477844.story
United Nations chief weapons inspector Hans Blix says he cannot rule out the presence of spies in his team due to resume work in Iraq - adding that any intelligence agents will be ordered off the group.
Mr Blix acknowledged that charges of spying had undermined the work of the previous UN inspection regime, known as Unscom.
"Unscom lost its legitimacy by being too closely associated with intelligence and with Western states," he added.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/2484569.stm
Seems to me Mr Blix sums it all up himself in that last quote of his. If they lost their legitimacy then there wasn't much sense for them even being there anymore.
I'm not saying anything about whether this was right or wrong. Just simply saying it happened and so is it any wonder that Saddam was making it difficult for the inspectors to do their work?
Edited by - seawolf on 3 January 2003 16:30:48