Posts by sf

custody battle being fought by a poster on this board.. she just found out that she lost custody of her 3 children to her jw ex, despite the fact that they are in danger of being exposed to a pedophile relative through this man.. i am asking anyone who may know anything about setting up a legal defense fund (or anyone who knows about utah custudy law/ lawyers in utah) to please respond to this post.

time is of the essence, the girls have already gone back to their father today.

sf

{{{{{Hugs Es}}}}}

I caught this in your post Es:

"...The mother lost custody because as usual, the JW spouse used all kinds of manipulation in court. Remember the Barry case, guys!"

My concerns here are of a curious nature. Aren't all judges in such cases AWARE of other cases going on in the courts; such as the timing with this case and the Berry case? My mind tells me that the judge in the custody case must have been aware of the Berry case and what it all entailed. Wouldn't he have considered the Berry case, at least, at the potential for harm if returned to the family where harm COULD occur to the child? And was it established in the custody trial that there was in FACT a risk of her being near the family member who they FEARED would harm her in a sexual way? And if so, wouldn't these said facts have any bearing or weight on other cases?

I hope I'm making sense and can understand some of the law in these cases, even though I may not ask them in a sensible way. I just want to try to make some sense of all the laws that protect the adults, yet rarely protect the kids right, FROM BIRTH. Seems as soon as a human is born, their life,soul and very freedom is never really areality to begin with. You are born as someones property and all your rights are null/void until your an adult.

I resent that I even have to qualify as an "adult"...they suck! That's why I won't "conform" to that "institution of thought" where, just because I am an "adult" that I rule...that's krap. I am NOT above my child. Her voice is strong and she respectfully is allowed to express it without fear of displaying any emotion in her expression that goes against "how you speak to an adult/elder" (ugh).
If she's pissed at me, she's fully allowed to express it...in the way she needs to with all her emotion and thoughts, without interruption.
If I do not allow her to do this, she will "store" it. And we know what happens when you "store" emotions and thoughts about your parents that should have been allowed to be freely expressed, don't we?

Respectfully, sKally

28

The branch coordinator wept during his convention

by Liquidizer in

jw
friends

the local branch office coordinator, mr. kankaanpaa, delivered the final speech in the summer convention held in tampere, the third largest city here in finland, and demanded all the ex-jw's to return back to the org.

suddenly he began to weep.

when he got his emotions under control, he instantly returned to the tradiotional wt phraseology: threats, intimitation and almost name calling (you know, that apostate stuff).

sf

Hi Philo,

I'm curious about what you say here:

"...I wonder if the org has ever considered making changes to allow people to do that."

Exactly what changes would actually cause/ manipulate you to "return"? And just what would "returning" entail? Your terms or theirs (GB)?

Sincerely, sKally

24

Re: Judah Ben Schroeder

by sf in

jw
friends

i pulled this out of the "berry case evaluated" thread so my questions would not be overlooked:.

i just want to make sure i fully understand, as stated here as fact, that judah schroeder was never, is or ever will be, in any way, shape or form, a "representative" or "director" for any part of the wtbts; no matter what corporate name you call them.. what has he done and/ or what were his "duties"?.

please, a history of the man, if you will.. in appreciation, skally

sf

Hank,

I ask that you do not tell me what to "forget". You have no right to do so. I can post with free will here, just as all are allowed the same. I will not stand for others TRYING to silence my voice here or anywhere. What makes you think I will or have to OBEY your "command"? Remember, I haven't been under an elders thumb for a long time. Isn't gonna happen ever again either...here or anywhere. I won't cease MY voice and choice of expression just because others think it's all krap. You really think I'm going to FORGET about anything that has to do with this ROT(TEN), CRIMINALLY,CORRUPT RACKETT? You really expect it to just be "forgotten"?

I will not discuss ona public forum my research re: the Illuminati either, as I know this is exactly what some want, for whatever reasons. And if you all can't stomach my posts, why do you eat them everyday??

Please, I will NOT be controlled by any Man, woman or child telling me what I can and cannot post and what to remember and what to forget. I will control that! Please, respect my freedoms of expression, whether you agree, like, or dislike my dialog. It's my right and I hereby claim it.

Sincerely, Skally, who wonders if they know it hurts when They do this, klass

27

Please hepl me to find answer

by petermanna in

jw
friends

hi all:.

i need your opinion about one web site its www.timestime.com .why i am asking for it ?

i am more than surprised about subject of this site and now i am confused what its right and what is wrong.this site contain information about god end of times and so on and i didnt found anything what can convinced me that that they are mistaking.think is i am studying with jw but they didnt want to help me to answer my questions because they said its not healty to read anything else except their books.i didnt listen because i am used to do everything on my own and now i am really searching.so if you could tell me at least that they are mistaking on their site and show me how ill apreciated.

sf

timestime.com:

Registrar: TUCOWS, INC.

Organization: BlackSun Inc.
address: Innovation Place 116 Research Dr
Saskatoon, SK S7N 3R3 CA

Admin contact: BlackSun, BlackSun
email: [email protected]
phone: 306 9334800
fax:

Tech contact: BlackSun, BlackSun
email: [email protected]
phone: 306 9334800
fax:

Nameservers: ns1.blacksun.ca
ns2.blacksun.ca

Does anyone remember this case.....

by sf in

jw
friends

< http://religiousfrauds.50megs.com/jw/murdered3.html.

and it's ending results?.

skally

sf

< http://religiousfrauds.50megs.com/jw/murdered3.html

and it's ending results?

sKally

14

for ex-jw's

by sunny444 in

jw
friends

bye!!!!!!!

and thanks to all of you.

sf

"No we are not!!!"

Dan...you're right!!!

sKally

12

Have WTS officials read CoC and/or other material?

by AvailableLight in

jw
friends

what are your thoughts?

have the officials of the wts read coc?

do you think or feel that they read "apostate" material regularly?

sf

Hi Bx,

Could you please scan what you are referring to, please? Some of us DO NOT subscribe.

I'm curious if there might be a site with listed articles as they are printed. Wonder why WTBTS doesn't already have their mags scanned for those who CAN'T get to meetings yet CAN read them on the net. Like what Randy does with his journal. Just why aren't the magazines on the net, provide by the Society? And don't say it's the money...it could'nt be. hahahaha

sKally

115

Ritsfield Victory!

by silentlambs in

hello everyone,.

i am bill's wife.he just called me from washington and told me to let you all know that erica won her case today!.

that sick child molesting bastard is in jail now as we speak.. his sentencing is set for september 24th i think.. one down many more to go.. thanks to all who have supported this cause.. sheila

sf

Hello Commie Chris,

I say Bingo! to your statement here:

"...This is not “revenge” - it is common sense and probably the only way to prevent a very serious crime."

And also, regarding what you mention here:

"...Unless they voluntarily submit to chemical castration,..."

Do tell please. This is actually an option for Them? Has anyone ever submitted to one, that you are aware of? If so, where can I read about it? Keywords for a search? Any casefiles? What's the procedure involve, thus "chemical"?

Sincerely, sKally