Okay, let me clear something up. I am not attacking Conti for being a victim of sexual abuse. I.would never do such a thing. I did not viciously berate her and browbeat her wit names and insults as is so often done on this forum. I looked at the court documents just like everyone else. I found some very disturbing/contradictory statements.on multiple occassions. How can I be considered a troll for pointing out the obvious contradictions directly from the horses mouth. Perhaps I could have gone about it in a better way, surely, but does that make my points invalid? Instead of.offering a defense for her, everyone would rather attack me. Why is that?
About the Ray Franz thread: I did not realize his books were so verbose anf meticulous. I imagined it being similar to Captives of a Concept. Brief, to the point, and not very time consuming. But I was wrong. I started the thread with full intentions.of debating the points made in the book, but it would be impossible.for me to discuss such meticulous arguments without many hours of research.
Again I am not a troll. My efforts are sincere. But you can call me what you'd like. Who I am is of no.importance anyway.