I think the phrase "equal distribution" is the one that makes people uncomfortable.
What makes someone "rich" is very subjective. I had a year where my buisness went very well. I have a few employees and subcontractors. We treat them all well, give them a good wage above the national average, and provide health insurance before it was going to be legislated. At the end of all things, because it was just a normal buisness, I end up in a high bracket, and have to fork over soemthing over 40% in tax to both state and the federal government.
Now if I was only taxed at 30% would I have hired another person? No. In that sense he is correct. However, I may have invested more, or purchased equipment etc... I am not wealthy by any stretch of the imagination. I don' have overseas investment, ad large portfolio of stocks, and capital gains to enjoy at a lower tax rate than most. Yet I paid more taxes as a % of income (by almost double), than Mitt Romney.
That is just a broken system. I didn't use any more road, or public services than anyone else did. I just made more because i worked 18 hours a day 7 days a week for a year.
It feels like a penalty. This is where I get confused as to what is really fair and what is not. I think I paid MUCH more than my fair share of taxes. I dont' mind paying more, but I paid an outlandish amount more.