Tricky, because there isn't any real AI yet. It's clever pattern matching, and it can fool you into giving the illusion that it's doing something clever (it is) but it isn't intelligence.
As an example: Generative AI art is improving all the time. Models are bigger, training is more involved, and PCs get more powerful. But it still doesn't really know what it's drawing. It can create amazing images, but it doesn't know how a hand holds an umbrella, which is why that same hand may sometimes be holding something behind it.
It doesn't really have any knowledge or intelligence of how the world is made up, and that the image is a visualization of that world. It just knows that certain patterns match certain words and go together a certain way. Well "knows" is too strong ... it has weights for them.
So let me know when real AI happens. Currently AI is in the "blockchain" phase - if you want to get funding, you say you're doing things with "AI".
None of this means jobs won't be impacted: the price of art has effectively just fallen to $0. Not only will this impact artists (digital artists more, the price for genuine real-life authentic art will probably go up), it will also impact art licensing companies too who live off them. Photographers and models ... why go to all that expense when AI can create the most beautiful woman imaginable and you can create versions for different markets with different ethnicities?
So there will inevitably be losers. But then there will be winners - companies will be able to produce products based on art without having to pay reproduction fees, so in theory that should be deflationary for prices (or else those companies will become more profitable).
It will of course also impact normal people's work, but mostly as a productivity boost. Just as spell checkers and grammar checkers allowed people to get more done faster, and to focus on higher level things, AI will be another tool. Of course when people are more productive, you tend not to need as many of them ...
