Good point, this is exactly what Bhom's conclusion is too. I think both perspectives are valid, but neither are absolute yet. In time science will have conclusive evidence, until then we can only draw conclusions from what we have.
Kate xx
Right but couple the conclusion Bhom comes to and add other factors...like:
- Is there any other evidence for a diety?
- Has there been any other communication with a diety?
- Is there any other evidence in other areas out with Chemistry that lean towards evolution?
- Etc etc?
You can't isolate this one point, which i still don't see how you come to the conclusion you arrive at, and say it means there is a diety WHEN you factor in all other evidences for a god or evolution...because evolution wins hands down every time when you base it on facts...the facts lean heavily towards there was no divine intervention from anything to get to where we are...