retro-
The Bible describes true faith as “the assured expectation of things hoped for, the evident demonstration of realities though not beheld.” (Hebrews 11:1) Clearly, far from being naive, a person with real faith has based his beliefs on a careful scrutiny of all available data. Reasoning on such information produces the conviction that even things that cannot be seen with the literal eye are, nonetheless, realities.
So please tell, are you an apostate, or do you base your faith on evidence and reason? And if the evidence shows that the Bible does not call Jesus an angel, why would the jws do so?
-for the first question i would refer to the scripture itself - "the assured expectation of things hoped for..."
...what you and i hope for can differ vastly retro, what we find in the scriptures allows for a million different faiths due to those hopes specifically...again your conviction is based on certain established parameters (what you call careful scrutiny)...and it is why we can have this debate on wether Jesus is/was an angel or not.
for the second question... i would never say "i am an apostate" , rather i base my faith on evidence and reason...in regards to this particular subject (is Jesus an angel?) u can clearly see my evidence and reason is not compatible with yours or christ alone's...