From the time I was a young pioneer, I wondered why JW’s
could not accept when a householder offered to exchange literature with us /me.
I just couldn’t picture Jesus being afraid of what another might argue. Obviously, Paul was familiar with other religions.
And I don’t mean just the Jewish faith.
Acts 17:27, 28 NWT: . . .that they would seek God, if they might
grope for him and really find him, although, in fact, he is not far off from
each one of us. 28 For by him we have life and move and exist, even
as some of your own poets have said, ‘For we are also his children.’
That same account mentions Epicurean and Stoic philosophers:
“Eventually he got into a debate with some Epicurean and Stoic philosophers.” -The Voice Translation or as NWT says “disputing
with him” I assume he disputed back
to them! He surely knew of their philosophy
and at least studied the fundamentals of their reasoning. He is brought to the
Areopagus and, “they brought him to the rock outcropping known as the
Areopagus, where Athens’ intellectuals regularly gathered for debate, and they
invited him to speak.” The Voice So here is Paul, ready for the Philosophical debate. How different from the mentality of the
modern JW today. The Reasoning Book had a listing for
philosophy, very interesting: rs p. 288
Philosophy – “As used here, philosophy is not built on acceptance of belief in
God, but it tries to give people a unified view of the universe and endeavors to make them critical thinkers.” Ah ha! there is the rub, we can’t have any of
that critical thinking, now can we? Notice this Service Meeting Part from 1992:
*** km
5/92 p. 2 Service Meetings for May ***
15 min: Protect Yourself From
Apostasy. Discussion between an elder and a publisher seated at a table.
Publisher explains that he met someone in service who has been reading apostate
literature. Publisher tells elder he feels householder was sincere in questions
he raised. Publisher refused householder’s offer of apostate publication but
would like to try to answer householder’s questions. Elder commends publisher
for his good attitude and actions. Rather
than discuss what apostates have written or said, it is wise to concentrate on
Scriptural viewpoint of matters as set forth in Reasoning book.
How unfair for the “unbelieving mate” who goes to a Church. They are invited to go to the Kingdom Hall
and miss their Church meeting, while the JW “believing mate” will not reciprocate
for fear of being an Apostate. Does that
even have the ring of reasonability?
I know this is nothing new, just allows me to vent. It came about because I was reading some of
the earlier posts, especially On The Way Outs encounter with the JW’s on his sidewalk.
He brought up some really excellent points to no avail of course. But I was thinking, what if we could tell
them that they don’t need to read anything Apostate. Are they allowed to watch video of their GB
members, is that permissible? Then
suggest they watch an unedited interview by a Government
sanctioned authority with Geoffrey Jackson. (The full transcript is available as well: https://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/sites/default/files/file-list/Case%20Study%2029%20-%20Transcript%20-%20Jehovahs%20Witnesses%20-%20Day%20155%20-%2014082015.pdf
Here is
just a very small portion:
Q. And do you see yourselves as Jehovah God's spokespeople on earth?
A.That I think would
seem to be quite presumptuous to
say that we are the only spokesperson that God is using.
I know, many of us have tried to do just that but can’t break
through. As was mentioned in the OTWO
post, maybe we can plant a seed and they will think.
And now, to Saint Stephen’s Feast or Boxing Day! As an arrogant Yank, I just learned what that
December 26 Holiday was all about in England and Canada.